this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
345 points (99.1% liked)

News

38197 readers
2239 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Jackson criticized her fellow justice's “ahistorical” interpretation of the 14th Amendment.

Echoing the Trump administration’s sentiments, Thomas argued in his dissent that the 14th Amendment “was designed and understood to secure equal rights for the freed blacks but has instead been repurposed for political projects that the Reconstruction Congress did not support.”

Thomas also argued that the Civil Rights Act, which became the foundation for the 14th Amendment, had ensured citizenship to people born in the U.S. and “not subject to any foreign power.”

“The Citizenship Clause [of the 14th Amendment], which the same Congress passed shortly after the Civil Rights Act, was understood to have the same meaning,” Thomas wrote. “It guaranteed citizenship to persons who were both ‘born . . . in the United States’ and ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof.’”

Jackson called this “ahistorical,” denying that the “text at issue conferred citizenship only on freed Blacks and those in analogous situations.”

Jackson also blamed the Trump administration and Thomas for repurposing the amendment, adding that the Civil Rights Act initially only included Black people but was later expanded to include people of all ethnic backgrounds.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

Bro. I'm fucking DYING at this. Gonna rewatch the MLK episode of Boondocks and shit my pants laughing at uncle SCOTUS.

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

Uncle Tom mfer is the blackest white supremacist in the US.

[–] tacoplease@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Clayton Bigsby is proud of Uncle Clarence

[–] stretch2m@infosec.pub 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

How can a man in his position be so wrong about every goddamn issue?

[–] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Epstein class and nazi bribery. Can't you see the cuckoldry in his eyes, they grabbed em by the greed. What's he gonna do now, give up his ill gotten gains and admit he's a sockpuppet proxy for evil assholes.

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Never known a sellout to change their ways. It's just one of those lines you cross and never see again

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

The issue is, while you and I would spend money on a lawyer to attempt to get a favorable outcome in court, someone with a lot of money will spend it on a motorhome for the judge deciding the case.

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

The guy that put his pubes on a can of coke and then gave it to one of his interns?

[–] Rusticus@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s time to reduce Thomas’ vote on the SCOTUS to 3/5ths.

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

The funny thing is, given the aims he's working towards, that's basically where it's all going anyway

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I didn't realize that there was no constitutional right to birthright citizenship before the Civil War. TIL

Apparently, every state had its own laws and standards about who was a citizen, although there were a few congressional acts that established a basic framework.

It seems wild to me that we started a whole country and we didn't even figure out who was a member of it.

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

Keep in mind that the US was originally structured more like the EU. We spent about a century slowly shifting from a collection of nation states in an alliance to one big nation state.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A country of immigrants, no less.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago

Hey now sometimes you need to filter for the right immigrants, like can you imagine the absolute chaos that a Brandenburger could cause.

I don't know the point of this joke, just kinda felt like bashing the Prussians.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

American law continues to be built on "oh we forgot to make that a law" and "oh we didn't think that would matter".

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well it used to be much harder to have identifying documents. So if you were in the country, you were part of the country.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 19 hours ago

That's why there was so much emphasis on Landowners. Owning land required some form of government documentation, like a Deed. Beyond that, there were no Drivers Licenses, Social Security Cards, Student IDs, Work IDs, etc.

[–] QuantumSpecter@lemmy.world 73 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Justice Thomas is evil he had his newphew falsely imprisoned at hidden lake academy one of troubled teen programs and this one of old school programs based on synanon methods. bbc link

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 51 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Clarence ‘I Got Mine’ Thomas

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Clarence "an rv is price enough to destroy America" Thomas

[–] Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

If that was the case, he would have taken Oliver's offer. He must just really like destroying America. So much so that he passed up an RV and a million a year just to fuck off.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

Justice Thomas is evil he had his newphew falsely imprisoned at hidden lake academy one of troubled teen programs and this one of old school programs based on synanon methods.

Is that one long sentence, or is that a few sentences with no pause in-between?

[–] ignirtoq@feddit.online 49 points 1 day ago (2 children)

After attending the Supreme Court hearing earlier this year, Trump falsely claimed in a Truth Social post that the U.S. is “the only Country in the World STUPID enough to allow ‘Birthright’ Citizenship!”

This is such a stupid and easily disproved take. I've had relatives claim to me that the US is the only country with birthright citizenship. It's very common in the Americas.

And even if it wasn't, and the US was the only country with birthright citizenship, isn't that our choice as a nation? Do we have to do what other countries do? If we're going to do that, can we start with universal healthcare and then revisit birthright citizenship after, say, better protections for unions, guaranteed parental leave, guaranteed vacation time, unlimited sick time, higher taxes on the wealthy, abolition of at-will employment, and about 100 other policies the US is the only wealthy nation either not to have or to have a legal framework against?

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

There are 35 countries that provide citizenship unconditionally to anyone born within their national borders.

[–] Bristlecone@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

Uncle Tom bitchass. I hope he crashes his god awful motorhome

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

RiPpEd

So now the country will go back to being kind of functional, right?

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago

For now. We've established that SC Justices are allowed to make decisions totally disregarding the text of the constitution. It's only a matter of time before Mississippi decides to send catholics to prison, and some future SC decides that that's fine because the founding fathers would have wanted everyone to be evangelical.

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

“How can it be that black people are free?”

As spoken by the one judge who could care less…

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 4 points 1 day ago

Wake me up when they literally rip him in half.