this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2026
365 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

86122 readers
4463 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] red_bull_of_juarez@lemmy.dbzer0.com 166 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Expected asshole behavior from Meta and zero sympathy to people who buy that trash.

[–] pcouy@lemmy.pierre-couy.fr 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I was about to type pretty much the exact same thing, but I figured it would already be here for me to upvote :)

[–] Stormy@thelemmy.club 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I wasn't paying attention when Facebook began ruining technology with bad business decisions but it's getting old.

I have an oculus VR that's basically useless now that meta owns the company. They decided to stop updating it, so my 450 dollar bought brand new hoped it would last for life is a paper weight.

Pay wall for already way too expensive and kind of pointless glasses? Like what. Is that how they're making money now?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 3 days ago

androids like zuckerberg are unlikely to have emotions, or humanity.

[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 88 points 3 days ago

Enshitification of shit. They truly are meta.

[–] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

These mofos watched the failure that was google glass and went for it anyway lol

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I am kind of into the idea of having a little screen on the peripheral of my glasses for a heads up display as an interface with my phone. Or even as a full screen mirror for my phone to be able to browse lemmy or watch video while still keeping an eye on my surrounding. I really can't imagine why they decided they also needed to have it record everyone secretly.

[–] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 3 points 2 days ago

The google glass design was pretty cool, sans camera. Iirc people were modifying them I think? Wonder how hard it would be to remove the camera. Probably soldered directly to the board. You could always try to make your own with some form of transparent screen

[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 32 points 3 days ago

Nothing fills my heart with such joy as negative Meta headlines.

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Good headline. Didn't call them "owners". Because this doesn't happen to something you own.

Article's first sentence already fails though.

[–] CTDummy@aussie.zone 26 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I was always a fan of Ray Ban and got their glasses/sunglasses. Guess I need to look elsewhere since this god awful partnership.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Personally i avoid visible branding, and at that point you can just go with whatever frame you like. Investing in high quality lenses is much better spent money in my experience, lightweight+deglared+extra thin lenses make a world of difference for comfortable wearing over longer time for me.

[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 days ago

Apparently when you get Ray Ban frames for prescription glasses, you can pay extra to have the Ray Ban logo engraved on them. So if you see someone with prescription glasses with the Ray Ban logo, you can lose a little more respect for them.

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I used to like Ray Bans, too. Then Luxotica bought them and they've never got any on my money since. I buy exclusively from Costco because they only sell non-Luxotica brand glasses for significantly cheaper.

Prescription sunglasses look identical to aviators, at a fraction of the price.

[–] mmmac@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Would be great of Costco had their own brand of smart glasses

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago

Why? Smart glasses are stupid and no one should be buying them. They are a scam and another form of constant surveillance and recording. Only now with more accurate face recognition. All hail the future police state.

[–] eighty@aussie.zone 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

did not know Costco sold exclusively non-luxo glasses - interest piqued

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Sam's does the same and you don't need a membership to use the eye center for either.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Might I suggest Persol?

Sadly, they are expensive, but they look good and have great quallity in my experience.

As for glasses, five years ago, I got my first Lindberg glasses, and I am never going back to other brands.

I am currently on my third pair of black Lindberg Aaron and my current sunnies are a pair of gunmetal Persol PO1027S with custom brown lenses.

I have all of my pervious Lindberg frames and will start reusing them next time, as for the Persol, I lost my earlier pair of an earlier model of Persol sunglasses, but I plan on getting new models or a new pair of the same model to have some spares or variation.

[–] CTDummy@aussie.zone 2 points 2 days ago

Cheers for the comprehensive recommendations, I’ll check them out!

[–] Grumpus_Maximus@thelemmy.club 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Jeeezus. Who uses these products? They are cumbersome to begin with, and so much worse with enshittification

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

So far as i can tell, people who make PoV content, everything from YouTube shop vendors to porn

[–] 123@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago

They seemed reasonable for people that like fishing and the like (ignoring the huge privacy issues).

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

This bait-and-switch bullshit has gone way too far and I hope the few dozen socialists that get elected this fall really wreck this shit for the billionaires and force regulation.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Nobody deserves it more

[–] Trebuchet@europe.pub 15 points 3 days ago

Good. Perverts.

[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 5 points 2 days ago

Oh you thought we'd only demand hundreds of bucks for this trash? naw, now you need to pay a subscription fee. Now pay up loser.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

Usually one would wait til their product take over the market before enshitifying it. For this one, they don't even have a feasible market. Who am I to judge tho.

[–] Prathas@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 days ago
[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

GOOD!!!! FUCK THESE GLASSES

These should literally exclusively be an aid device for the visually impaired and nothing more.

[–] oopsgodisdeadmybad@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

I kinda think that's hilarious and how everyone that bought these go broke. Maybe at least someone will finally learn something then.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 6 points 3 days ago

Sucked in, dickheads!

[–] Zen_Shinobi@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Well that was fast

[–] Darkard@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Like, basic vision? That would be funny