this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2026
326 points (99.4% liked)

politics

30314 readers
2562 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

There clearly needs to a rules for circumstances like this. The people do not have a functional representative at the moment and haven't for month. That isn't democracy and is not what the intent is. Y'all need to organize with each other and become actively political. I don't mean protests and marches, I mean help each other learn how the procedures of politics functions and start using them.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 193 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

the Kentucky lawmaker hasn’t voted in nearly a month

Missing X votes per term should be grounds for impeachment or recall or something. Being unable to fulfill your obligations to your constituents and still occupying the position is disgusting. I don't really agree with his constituents, but we all deserve our constitutionally guaranteed representation. People deserve sick leave, but there needs to be a mechanism to stop this kind of exploitation of basically an unreplaceable position.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 56 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Not “grounds for”, it should be automatic. The system has lots of mechanisms to remove bad actors, but due to the inherent obstructionism in the system it’s impossible to actually trigger them.

Sick leave is fine, but the job has to get done regardless.

[–] Chee_Koala@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

For automatic triggers you need SOME way to combat extreme unfairness (like something calamity induced for example), but any way i can see to fairly do that doesnt really work in a 2 party system. A multiparty system would be better protected against voting with the party vs voting according to your morals, or whatever you would call what is happening over there.

I guess in the current state of the dysfunctional US legislative + judicial system that unfairness would be a small price to pay.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 12 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I think the constituency should be able to decide. If there's a natural disaster or something and the person is either helping locally or somehow affected and the opposition attempts to rush through votes to get a special election where several displaced people may be unable to vote I don't want them to have that power. At the end of the day the people being represented should be able to decide what to do.

Maybe automatic makes more sense, I just don't love policies where the people affected have no say. I feel like they are easy to abuse. I know they could technically reelect the same person, but as is people struggle to get to the polls. I can't imagine rushing a special election during some kind of disaster. It's a lot of money and stress if people don't actually want the change.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

In the US elections are entirely up to the state, regardless of any other factor: a state legislature can constitutionally address any unusual circumstances, like a natural disaster, according to its needs.

As a separate issue, in most states the governor simply selects replacements for vacant offices, like US Senator, and would also be able to do so in the event of any extreme circumstances.

But Mitch McConnell himself worked to change this in Kentucky in 2024, as soon as he realized he wasn't going to run again and his health might give out on him: he wanted to ensure Gov. Beshear, a Democrat, could not select his replacement.

The law in Kentucky that he helped to push through, requiring a special election for his replacement, IS automatically triggered and only bars a special election from three months prior to a regular election. If that deadline is passed, in this case August 3, then the good people of Kentucky only have one senator instead of two until January.

But to have a vacancy, someone has reveal the truth that there actually is a vacancy to be filled. So the suspicion now is that the Republicans are going to try to hide McConnell's condition until the first Tuesday in August -- the last day a Kentucky special election can be called -- so that Thomas Massie, a Republican who just got primaried out of his own Congressional seat, can't make a run for McConnell's now obviously vacant Senate seat.

This is an interesting debate -- X link / (xcancel link) -- around the minutiae of it; apparently no matter what happens now a legal challenge awaits in Kentucky. That's what happens when someone like McConnell pushes through a badly written, ill-thought piece of legislation that isn't clear enough: whoever doesn't like it has grounds to sue.

Which is to say that he didn't just fuck it up for his own vacant seat, he fucked it up for Kentucky as a whole, or at least until that law gets changed, by tying the governor's hands when ANY state or state-related federal office becomes vacant.

If this is too long I apologize; I started off answering your own comment and then it expanded to the current situation. I hope you find it useful.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 18 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean, letting the constituency decide does sound an awful lot like a special election 😉

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 93 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 65 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The only question swirling in my mind is how long they'll Weekend at Bernie's him before admitting the truth.

[–] Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca 49 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

After August 3 apparently, after then it is too late to put someone in for him until the election.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 29 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

That only works if they can keep everyone involved quiet. If he's actually deceased, that fact is going to leak.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 12 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like he's brain dead which fits with "found unconscious". They can keep him on life support for months

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

That's my guess as well. There was also reporting that said CPR was administered. When that is done on a frail elderly body, it creates many more problems than it solves.

He started with cardiac arrest and now he's got maybe a chest full of shrapnel as well: he's only leaving feet first, IMO.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 4 hours ago

5% survival rate for people his age.

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 15 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

My totally unfounded theory is that he's just hooked up to a bunch of machines to keep him "alive" and they'll pull the plug after that.

It really does make the most sense given the info at have so far.

[–] DrPop@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Makes sense, sounds horrific, especially I'd the only reason is political.

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago

Hos daughter getting off of X and all the other silence. It feels like someone pulled everyone aside and was like "we're gonna keep this dude "alive" and you all need to just take this for the team otherwise the democrats will win....or something.

[–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

In Texas they keep braindead pregnant bodies alive so they can give birth months later, even against family wishes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

He's probably on a machine.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 13 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Knowing Trump he'll let it slip as soon as he can.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 15 points 15 hours ago

They're not dumb enough to tell him, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 75 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Totally a normal thing a person does when they're trying not to scream at everyone to leave them alone because they're trying to mourn they deceased parent because dirty soulless politicians want them to keep the death a secret for their political games.

[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 67 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Totally normal to have your wife fly to China as soon as you have a heart attack and are sent to the hospital, too /s

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 53 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Of course she took off as soon as she could. She never expected that job to last over 33 years!

[–] SGGeorwell@lemmy.world 15 points 15 hours ago

Yes, she had to file her dossier with the station chief.

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.ca 43 points 17 hours ago
[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 34 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] gh0stb4tz@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

I don’t know what this is, but I feel like I should upvote it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 19 points 16 hours ago

This ENTIRE situation is PROOF that Trump runs the MOST TRANSPARENT Administration EVER!

-Free Thinking Alpha Republicans!

[–] sepi@piefed.social 20 points 16 hours ago

He's as spry as a dead 92-year-old man.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 16 points 16 hours ago

I think there are way more wishes of "drop dead already" than "speedy recovery"...

[–] Honse@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 16 hours ago (11 children)

The best part is it's legally unclear how this will resolve, they'll likely be able to just stay silent and block any attempt for a special election and have a decent legal argument for it. One last fuck you from Mitch.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 14 points 16 hours ago
load more comments
view more: next ›