this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
113 points (99.1% liked)

politics

30351 readers
2673 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/49238353

“When losses happen, somebody’s got to pay for it.”

Called Freedom Fuel Network, the enterprise encompasses dozens of gas stations throughout Pennsylvania and New Jersey, USA Today reported, although it isn’t exactly clear which locations are open for business. Plastered in American flag decals and “Freedom Fuel” branding, the gas stations seem to be selling unleaded gasoline for the fixed-price of $3.47 per gallon, about 32 cents cheaper than the current average price in the US.

According to GasBuddy, nearby prices range from $3.85 to as much as $4.49 — no doubt reflecting the slower drip of oil from the president’s costly war on Iran, which burst back into active fighting this week.

As head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy Patrick De Haan told the Philadelphia Inquirer, the current price of crude oil means there’s no way Freedom Fuel’s $3.47 price point can turn a profit.

“Stations selling at this price, it’s not sustainable,” De Haan explained. “Generally, when losses happen, somebody’s got to pay for it.”

De Haan raises an obvious question: who is paying for it? If the stations are losing money on every gallon, somebody has to make up the difference somewhere — whether out of Trump’s pocket, that of a friendly donor, or the taxpayer’s. And if it’s a private company taking the hit, how long until they stop subsidizing Pennsylvania drivers?

Already, the stunt seems to be distorting local markets. As of Wednesday, a nearby Sam’s Club in Dresher dropped its price to match the $3.47 figure — surely good news for anybody buying gas in South Eastern Pennsylvania, but as always, the devil is in the details.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FukOui@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 hours ago

Midterms stunt

[–] artyom@piefed.social 7 points 12 hours ago

Funny that the article doesn't even consider that he is leveraging his presidency to receive fuel at lower prices but he's actually gouging customers anyway and making huge profits.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

This is fucking awesome. God yes! Please kill all your small-dick F350s with Trump's sugar diesel. Be sure to pay inside so you buy a big fat greasy meat chunk and as many deregulated red bulls and yellowjackets as you can afford! You really are winning so hard right now.

[–] nightwatch_admin@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

Trump gas, must smell awful.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 10 points 17 hours ago

The Gang Solves the Gas Crisis

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 24 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

There was a filling station in my town which was also significantly cheaper. About 40-50 cents less than nearby stations. I used it for years but also wondered how it was so cheap. Then one day, I went there and the price had gone up from the bargain of a decade to merely reasonable. I was wondering why but then I noticed that someone had put a sticker next to the dispenser keypad that wasn't there before: a fuel tax sticker. It's required by law on all fuel pumps here but I guess I just never noticed that they just never had one there previously.

No points for guessing what happened lol

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Surprised it didn’t go to overpriced. I’m sure the station was swimming in fines after that.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

The old owners could've been fined into bankruptcy and then the franchise was sold to someone else.

[–] ryokimball@infosec.pub 22 points 22 hours ago

I look forward to some renegade renaming efforts changing it to the Socialist Fuel Network.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 6 points 17 hours ago

Let’s say it’s not bad for cars, it’s a far cry from the $2 he promised voters.

It’s a whole bunch of murders away from the no wars he promised.

I hope Iran can keep their promise of ending him.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 8 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Is it possible that the wholesale cost of fuel is below 3.47 and the others just have higher profit margins?

Edit: Once taxes and fees are incorporated you end up at approximately $3.6-3.7 for Pennsylvania and New Jersey. The small difference is probably made up for with advertising, other purchases or funding for PR campaign. It's about $2.40 per car tank

3.47 was profitable just a week or two ago when wholesale prices were 2.59

https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/gasoline

I want the price of oil to be $2028 dollars per barrel

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 4 points 18 hours ago

Totally not another scam....

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I really hope it ruins lots of engines.

[–] RedditAdminsSuckIt@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yo I drive a 2006. My engine is concerned

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

From my perspective, a 2006 is still a pretty new car. (Most of mine are from the '90s.)

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago (2 children)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Because I'm a "car guy" and each vehicle is in a different niche. I've got a Miata (RWD, for autocross), a WRX (AWD, for rallycross), a 4Runner (4x4, for off-road trails), etc.

Some of them are currently non-running project cars, and almost none of them are practical. (Perhaps ironically, my "daily driver" is actually a cargo e-bike.)

Also, I'm sentimental and bad at getting rid of them, even if I probably should.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago
[–] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 3 points 15 hours ago

Parts and Projects.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't they recently start allowing for 85 octane fuel? Just a thought

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 21 hours ago

It wasn't 85 octane, it was ethanol content- raising it from e10 to e15. Same octane but lower energy density by a percent or two, and can be damaging to older vehicles that may not have ethanol safe gaskets in the fuel system. And also is a huge bailout for industrial corn farmers in red states.

85 is only allowed in a few select high mountain states like Colorado, where the extremely thin air means lower octane fuels have a lower chance of detonating/pinging and causing engine damage.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Is this Argentina’s oil?

[–] FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Do you mean Venezuela’s oil?

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago

Probably. I can’t keep track of it all.