this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
20 points (81.2% liked)

politics

30411 readers
2845 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Under the proposal, anyone who publicly or at a gathering denies the right of the State of Israel to exist, or calls for its elimination, would face punishment.

archive: https://web.archive.org/save/https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitism/article-902237

original url : https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitism/article-902237

German parliament advances bill to criminalize denial of Israel’s right to exist

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This cannot be legal under EU regulation, and for fucks sake Germany, get a grip!
You can't fight idiocy with even more idiocy, and in this case it's not even stupid to question the legitimacy of Israel.
Goddam Germany is on the wrong track regarding Israel!! 🤢 🤮
And no I am neither Arabic or Muslim. I'm an Atheist, multiple generations European.
But for some reason I just don't think a country that exist to commit genocide should be allowed to exist.

[–] treehugger6@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Israhell doesn't have a right to exist. It's Palestine.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Germany moves to criminalize denial of Israel's existence | The Jerusalem Post

Why the fuck is the headline changed to be brain dead stupid???

The actual headline:

German parliament advances bill to criminalize denial of Israel's right to exist

And don't use excuses like it's the stupid automated suggested headline, because this is so sloppy that the headline doesn't even make sense!

[–] interesting@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

news title is "German parliament advances bill to criminalize denial of Israel's right to exist"

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] interesting@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] interesting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

I want to thank you. I missed something else, or it was the cache that suggested the Lemmy title

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

no country has a right to exist.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

There's a thing we call international law, and that absolutely define that countries have a right to exist, and a right to self determination.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I guess Nuremberg never actually finished the job...

[–] cookiecoookie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Everyone who paid attention knew the Nuremberg Trials were done for optics, not for truly punishing evil.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

You really butchered that headline.

"German parliament advances bill to criminalize denial of Israel's right to exist"

the article also says

"It does not restrict criticism of Israeli government policies or theoretical debate about Middle East politics.

Art and academic works are exempt to the extent covered by existing protections for science and art."

And while I'm not happy about anything that makes them happy, I suppose that is an acceptable law. I don't think hate speech is tolerable and I don't think Genocide is any solution in response to Genocide because it involves innocents getting caught up in it.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

One can recognize Israel's "right to exist" and still be genocidal towards Israeli Jews (e.g., "it has the right to exist as a Gaza-sized enclave in the area of present day Tel-Aviv, subjected to the same conditions currently applied by Israel to Gaza").

One can refuse Israel's "right to exist" and champion the rights of Israeli Jews to live in security as citizens with full political and legal equality in a post-apartheid democratic, non-sectarian, and non-ethno-supremacist, secular state of Palestine.

"Israel's right to exist" is not any kind of guarantee against genocide. It is merely a political technology aimed to paint decolonial perspectives as "antisemitic".

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

What?? How does that change the fact that the headline was butchered?
Also it doesn't really make sense.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I was responding to this bit only:

I suppose that is an acceptable law. I don’t think hate speech is tolerable and I don’t think Genocide is any solution in response to Genocide because it involves innocents getting caught up in it.

My argument is that "denial of Israel's right to exist" does not equate "genocide".

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

OK, I got it all wrong, sorry.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't pretend Israel has any intention of keeping Gaza intact. That's bullshit. Palestine has been shrinking for decades, and Israel explicitly supported the new US Admin whose stance is "death or exodus". They don't believe in Palestine's right to exist, they want to eradicate them.

There is even leaked intel that the Israeli admin knew the music festival attack was coming and did nothing to stop it.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nothing I wrote supports the assertion that "israel has any intention of keeping Gaza intact".

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

(e.g., “it has the right to exist as a Gaza-sized enclave in the area of present day Tel-Aviv, subjected to the same conditions currently applied by Israel to Gaza").

The conditions applied to Gaza by Isreal do NOT respect its right to exist.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I specifically brought up this fictional horror scenario as an example of genocidal thinking, with the intent precisely to distinguish between the fictional "right to exist" of a state and the very real "right to exist" of a people.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Interestingly enough, it was argued many times over by Plato in his writings that the purpose of having a family, getting married, etc. is the value it would bring to the State.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Plato was writing about the Polis. That is a much different polity and a much different socio-cultural milieu that any kind of mass modern nation-state.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 2 days ago

I don't think it would hold up in German Court, but hey maybe we'll see.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don’t think Genocide is any solution in response to Genocide

Paradox of tolerance:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I believe in this but I believe it is applied at an individual scale. Try each and every Israeli soldier for their crimes, fine by me, but the innocents will walk free.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it is applied at an individual scale

No mot at all, it's one of the best arguments to not allow discrimination, and fascism, and many other greater scales of intolerance.
It can be applied to Israel in the exact same way it can to for instance Nazism.
Tolerating Israel is tolerating intolerance. And Israel has developed in such a way, it can be argued the country exist only to commit genocide against their neighbors.
It is absolutely intolerable that Germany now protect Israel so they can do the same that the Nazis did against the Jews, they are attempting to right a wrong, by aiding Israel in doing the exact same wrong once again. It's disgusting, and it's disgusting to see people arguing that we cannot even talk about stopping it!
Shame on you!

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 0 points 1 day ago

Sounds like you don't believe in fair trials so I guess I'd be fine with you not getting one.