this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026

161 points (99.4% liked)

News

38360 readers

2450 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.

7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

161

New York becomes first state to impose one-year pause on new AI datacenters (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 6 hours ago by tonytins@pawb.social to c/news@lemmy.world

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

New York became the first US state to enact a moratorium on new datacenters on Tuesday.

Governor Kathy Hochul issued an executive order mandating a one-year statewide pause on the large facilities used to power artificial intelligence products, which she signed at a mid-morning press conference.

“As datacenter development threatens to hike up utility bills, deplete our natural resources, and create uncertainty for New Yorkers, it’s my responsibility to take action and lead,” Hochul, a Democrat, said in a statement.

The order will pause the state permitting process for proposed “hyperscale” datacenters, defined as having electrical capacity of more than 50 megawatts, and direct state regulators to create standards focused on environmental impacts, energy demand, water usage and other factors, the governor’s office said.

top 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 hours ago

These data centers have virtually no purpose except for keeping a bubble from popping. A year out may as well be a permanent ban as far as the whole operation is concerned.

Finding out how to permit them isn't hard: Stop exempting them from laws and regulation. All the laws and regs are there to address all those 'impacts' and 'factors' they want to form committees about.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Most of the "New York" area datacenters are in New Jersey, anyway....

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 58 minutes ago

New Jersey has always been NY's septic tank.

[–] BigShammy80@feddit.org 10 points 6 hours ago

Uh, they finally realize how it effects energy and water? Well done.

[+] riskable@programming.dev -6 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Ugh. This is the law of unintended consequences in action.

Instead of building large, vastly more efficient data centers, companies will build smaller ones and spread them out over a geographical area that all use the same power provider (so they can save an equivalent amount of money on bulk use). Resulting in more power draw, more land use, and will require more infrastructure.

The only solution to the problem of data center power utilization is to mandate they be powered by renewables.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Thats not the only solution.

Restricting their total energy and/or pollution budgets (so they dont just build their own terrible power plants) will force them to power with renewable energy AND develop more energy-efficient hardware if they want to keep scaling up the capacity.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I like how "just don't build any more new datacenters" is not even an option for you guys.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 1 points 2 hours ago

The horse is out of the barn. If they want to build a completely solar powered mega slop farm, I say go for it. The whole thing is either going to die out or get better as long as we don’t just let it consume the planet in the meanwhile.

[–] JPAKx4@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 hours ago

We'll have to see how it turns out, but there are many more problems with spreading them out. You need more employees, more land, more contracts to build and with power companies. Also, spreading out the datacenters will avoid concetrating the harmful effects in a specific place, usually poorer communities that are ignored by regulations often.

I think the most likely outcome is people moving away from New York entirely. Its already difficult with the higher costs of labor and regulations, so this may be a final nail in the coffin. Data centers aren't a great asset to have in your community, as it drains resources and has a low economic impact to help improve the local's resources.