this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2026
42 points (80.0% liked)

politics

30470 readers
2331 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When the “woke” mania swept the country in 2020, I took a step back and reevaluated where I stood and why I stood there. To my surprise, I found that I agreed with conservatives and libertarians on a number of issues. I opposed childhood gender transitions, unlawful and divisive DEI mandates, and the excesses of Critical Race Theory. I argued against biological males competing in women’s sports and being housed in women’s prisons. I did so loudly and publicly, losing many friends along the way. My stance wasn’t rooted in hate or fear but in a commitment to reason and fairness. My loyalty was to the truth, not to political tribes. Maintaining my integrity cost me greatly, but I believed it was worth it.

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 2 points 22 minutes ago

Collaborator

I'm shocked. Shocked! Well, not that shocked.

[–] deft@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 hour ago

TEEFs went conservative? Yeah no surprise. Stupid fucking TERFs hiding behind the label of their sexuality

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 9 points 9 hours ago

What a fucking tratior

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 42 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Where's that cartoon, the one with the MAGAt thanking the gay guy for helping to round up the last of the trans people, and the gay guy says, "You're welcome! Who are we going after next?" And the MAGAt just stands there smiling at him.

Like, what did she expect was going to happen?! Oh, I see:

Many will say I should have seen this coming — that the right has and always will be against LGBT rights. And maybe there’s some truth to that. But that just wasn’t my experience.

Translation: repression isn't real unless it's happening to ME.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

Translation: repression isn't real unless it's happening to ME.

That's a really good summary of conservatism.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 15 points 14 hours ago

but that just wasn't my experience

Lady, you JOINED because they were against LGBT rights? These people are unwell.

[–] toomanypancakes@crazypeople.online 87 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Like we fucking told your terf ass they would from the beginning

I still oppose radical gender ideology and Critical Race Theory in schools. I still believe that biological males shouldn’t compete in women’s sports or be housed in women’s prisons. But I will not stand by while LGBT rights are legislated away.

Still a conservative, just slightly more aware of the leopard on her face.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 7 points 12 hours ago

Hey now, she may be gay but nobody said she couldn't be a fucking stupid conservative too.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 10 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Still a conservative, just slightly more aware of the leopard on her face.

Oh Reid Newton is a conservative. From the last paragraph:

Trump won in 2024 in part due to the left’s overreach. If the right continues down this path, they could meet a similar fate in future elections. As more people come out as LGBT, and as more LGBT people voice concerns with far-left activist orthodoxies, Republicans should be broadening the tent, not excluding these people and pushing them away. Hemorrhaging potential voters to get your druthers isn’t a winning political strategy. The pendulum from hell will just keep swinging back and forth until we all decide we’ve had enough.

Reid Newton is failing to acknowledge that the entire conservative movement has always been rooted intolerance.

[–] SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today 1 points 12 hours ago

They're pretending the intolerance is reasonable:

My stance wasn’t rooted in hate or fear but in a commitment to reason and fairness.

I think they mean, "I'm scared of not winning when I deserve to win, and I hate people who try to take that from me."

From my point of view, it is reasonable to affirm one's gender, it is fair to let everybody play in a game if they follow the rules. But I don't care who wins, and apparently that is very important to some people.

[–] manxu@piefed.social 33 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

A TERF lesbian may think she has more in common with conservatives than with other queer folk. Conservatives will never think so. 

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

"I have four appendages and a mouth, and leopards have four appendages and a mouth. I thought they'd see me as one of them!"

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

unlawful and divisive DEI mandates, and the excesses of Critical Race Theory.

The two subjects that immediately tell me everything I need to know about a person's politics. If those two things are an issue for you, you just listen to fox talking heads and have never tried to actually understand the issue.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 18 points 15 hours ago

This is where it gets me. What is Critical Race Theory?

You mean History?

unlawful and divisive DEI mandates

You mean like when they replaced hundreds of government jobs with mediocre white guys who don't even have a degree/experience? How they put the WIFE of a business owner in charge of the Department of Education?

Every supposed "DEI hire" has the education to back it up.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I figured that much out at "childhood gender transitions," before I even got to the part you quoted. She started the list off with a fictional boogeyman.

(Puberty blockers are literally the opposite of "childhood gender transitions" as the entire point is to stall for time until adulthood.)

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 2 points 9 hours ago

Puberty blockers were the compromise, and the right shat all over it. There's no reason to play ball and not just let younger teens have HRT now

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 28 points 16 hours ago

I opposed childhood gender transitions...

My loyalty was to the truth,

What a dumbfuck.

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago

This should be on leopard ate my face

[–] blackbelt352@lemmy.world 42 points 17 hours ago

This article is infuriating, she's still a conservative after everything she experienced, after realizing conservatives have no principles other than power, and that she was a disposable token to be spent when convenient. And her big conclusion is that conservatives overreaching is leading to their downfall, and not the lack of principles or abject hatred of anyone who isnt cis, het, white, and male.

[–] meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 18 hours ago

Cool. Don't think they'll care you were a devoted TERF when they come pick you up for the queer camp.

[–] RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago

This is a dangerous game right-wing culture warriors are playing.

You would know, jackass.

[–] Gamechanger@slrpnk.net 25 points 18 hours ago

If xou are that stupid, you earned it!

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 21 points 18 hours ago

"Now"

lol. Lmao even. Conservatives were always against the whole gang, Aunt Tam apparently didn't realize.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

stupid self-hating bitch.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 12 points 17 hours ago

This is a thirteen month old article but the writer should have known who Trump and he party was after the first term.

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 11 points 17 hours ago

This is what we call a log cabin republican. Enjoy the leopards sweetie!

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

Downvoted because no one needs to read this type of stupidity.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 4 points 15 hours ago

Agreed with both sides unfortunately.

Downvote - sure. Fuck this shit.

Upvote - sure. Every moron who even slightly considered this perspective should get their ass ripped into.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 4 points 15 hours ago

It's not even a particularly well laid-out column; she rambles back and forth.

[–] treehugger6@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

No comment. Go shoot yourself in the foot. Idiot

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

I think she misspelled idiot.