The ability to create porn of anyone you want is a human right.
But not healthcare.
this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
296 points (99.7% liked)
News
38564 readers
2264 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Pedophilic porn
Elon Musk? You mean the guy who murdered all those children with a chainsaw? The guy who invented replicator technology, but only for CSAM? That guy?
No, this is the guy that cremates his car buyers with doors that can't open.
All of them or just...? You know.
Give him time, man. He's bound to have a ton of money invested in creating a way to physically replicate the actual children. It's an area of research a lot of rich and powerful people are highly interested in, especially now that they've pretty much perfected boner pills.
The odds on Kalshi that a way to clone kids and quickly age them to whatever age (1-16) you set the dial to will be publicly available at least a year before boring shit like a cure for cancer or Malaria are 7146:1 right now.
I put $30 on cancer coming first just because I'm sure some idiot somewhere is still working on that, and maybe they'll get lucky. At the moment that's my most fleshed out retirement plan.
Using AI to undress images of children you filmed in public with your pervert glasses is a first amendment right! They can't make that illegal! I hate big government meddling in everything that's none of their business!
The government exists to protect the wealthy, ruin the economy for everyone else, execute brown people and lefty commies in the the street, control women's bodies and force them to do what men say and bear our spawn whenever we want, keep gays from being able to marry, and make sure the lives of all those rainbow freaks are pure hell every day. And that's all!
They have ZERO business interfering with the natural, normal, beautiful acts of grown men having sex with children or using technology to undress them without their consent or knowledge!
I don't understand why he insists on making this a thing. I mean, i can see why he would get involved--he's a repugnant incel-pilled dork who has to offer compensation in exchange for sex because literally nobody wants to do it with him. This is how he gets his revenge on women for not acquiescing to his disgusting advances.
But looking beyond all that, i still want to understand why he believes it's so important that it exists--that he's willing to fight lawsuits over it. I don't know if this properly explains it, but i think it's important to see what they're saying about it.
In the lawsuit, xAI said the terms of service for using Grok prohibit using it for “any illegal, harmful, or abusive activities” that violate someone’s privacy, including altering their image to nudify them or depict them in a sexually explicit image. It said it enforces those rules against violators through account suspensions or terminations, and by reporting suspected child sexual abuse content.
xAI also said earlier this year that it has “zero tolerance for any forms of child sexual exploitation, non-consensual nudity, and unwanted sexual content”.
After a global backlash over sexualized images of women and children, Grok said in January it will geo-block content if it violates laws in a particular place, preventing people from editing photos of real people in revealing clothing in places where that is illegal. Grok’s “spicy mode” had allowed users to create explicit content, leading to a backlash from governments worldwide.
“We have implemented technological measures to prevent the Grok account from allowing the editing of images of real people in revealing clothing such as bikinis, underwear and other revealing attire,” xAI said in a January statement.
It sounds like this thing isn't going to be allowed nearly anywhere if it's as restricted as they claim it is. Which leads me of course to the fact that this asshole will do whatever he wants regardless of the law and anyone that wants to challenge him can try to get their day in court. Bonus points for their self-policing solution, lol. I'm sure Grok'll be turning pedos in left and right 🥴
Bonus points for their self-policing solution, lol. I'm sure Grok'll be turning pedos in left and right
He'll just introduce them to whoever has taken over Epstein's Concierge Service.
It's quite simple - by allowing this type of genAI to take hold and have no guardrails, any and all future allegations against the Epstein class can be dismissed with a "fake news, that's AI" claim.
And since AI is getting better and better at generating images while getting worse and worse at recognising AI generated content...
That's a good point. I've read that AI medical assistants will function in a way that will effectively make them work as an accountability shield. The AI would be calling the shots and the doctors will be the 'guardrails' and when mistakes are made it won't be the AI to blame, but the doctor who failed to catch it's error.
Whatever happened to the legal issues this pasty slug was facing in Europe over Grook being used to do "nudification" for children?
So far nothing besides opening of proceedings, which happened in January. It's here at the bottom.
Seems like they usually need almost a year to get further.
Thanks for the update :)
"xAI" is a more professional sounding name than "grok" but he can't even be original. He has to steal Apple's "Lower case i" and change it to an "x". All I see is "TwitterAI".
We went through the e- stage, and the i- stage, now it's time for the x- stage. We're running out of edgy letters, i- wasn't even a good one. Still got z-.
Probably would save more money than he ever did under DOGE if he just stopped fucking litigating everything
Nudify musk
Gross
Just Why?
@grok, pass me the eyebleach please
The light reflection alone there should be enough to blind you. Moths probably fly at that man at night.
I knew a girl in high school who was half Irish half Scottish. She looked pretty similarly pasty to musk.
You take that that back. Please never compare the radiant pale skin of women with beautiful accents and strong odds of a drinking problem to the likes of Elon Musk.
The beacons are lit! Gondor calls for aid!
Is he ... pissing?
I think someone is washing him, top left corner
So he already pissed himself
DLSS5 on....
Barrel bod.
Ew.
Seems weird that fElon, who has killed more people than the Chinese Nationalists but not quite as many as Hitler (yet), gets to have his cake and eat it too with his web of companies. Somehow SpaceX, the parent company, is not mentioned at all here. Almost like they want to put some distance between this action and the tumbling stock. It's "of course we all work together" or "we don't even know those guys" depending on what benefits the moment.
He is afraid to lose the only branch that actually provides income?
But the technology itself is the problem.
are we the baddies
He probably knows he can't, but it would be fumed up from the discussion on limits of LLMs to attacks on his american :boldeagle: :ar15: freedum! and some challenge from lapdoggy trump's henchpersons.