this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
418 points (99.1% liked)

Games

50034 readers
1443 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pnwpixel@programming.dev 7 points 19 hours ago

And? What fucks are there left to give about a publically malicious/murderous government buying a publically malicious company which publically destroys their creatives ability to stay alive in this capitalist shitscape?

I want the heart and soul of those studios (the creatives) to create a tsunami of indie studios to revive the long lost connection between the gamers and the makers.

We have to support indie devs if we want gaming to be better for all involved.

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Sell 700 one million dollar skins

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

Don't tempt the whales

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

CEO Andrew Wilson is set for a massive payday. The company’s last SEC filing before going private pointed to a $77 million payout for the last fiscal year, double the number that was previously reported.

One of the finer aspects of unfettered capitalism.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

That's actually crazy.

For reference, Split Fiction's development cost was ~$40 million USD over ~3-4 years, ~75 devs. That's one of EA's better games, and not cheap.

Yearly, $77 million could basically fund Battlefied development (with BF6 rumored to cost $400 million, maybe?).

It's 11% of what they're looking to cut!

Even if the rationale for the bonus is "Andrew Wilson put Battlefield back on track," that's still a good chunk out of the profits of ~500M of BF6 game sales so far.

It's 1% of EA's entire yearly revenue they last reported, $7.84B.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

They paid 53 bil for something that has only 300 mil /year in profits?

A 200 year ROI (interest on the 20 bil loan for the leveraged buyout that ea itself will need to pay) doesn't seems too bad

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you know, why EA is the worst company in the whole US of A? It's because Ubisoft is in France.

[–] bobbbu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago
[–] ours@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bloodbath... Saudi Arabia

How literally are we talking here?

[–] balgruuf@nord.pub 6 points 1 day ago

Unnecessary employees will be invited to the nearest consulate

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago

Leveraged buyouts should be illegal

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So, destroy its game making capabilities and just make money for the next 20 years from of microtransaction on existing content.

Kinda of a natural progression of AAA game publishers given the way things are nowadays.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Though how many devs does it take to increment one number for the new version of the game?

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It massivelly depends on what changes and how well in terms of software design the whole is done, and judging from what I've seen, for multiple reasons (it's easier to exploit yound and naived developers and those don't know how to do good software design; performance tends to be a big thing in games dev and performance optiomizantion generally goes against good software design; it's an area that tends towards experimentalism rather than well though integrated software design) gamedev isn't an area of software development were software design tends to be good.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

It's EA. Just search for "2026" replace with "2027".

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Anyone who did not see this coming is an idiot.

EA is... in a loooot of debt lol. Thats why they needed a buy out.

[–] FerrisEuler@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They've not had a lot of success in the 2020s except for sports games they obviously pay a lot of money in licensing fees for.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 19 hours ago

The Sims.

You do not want to know how many 'dlc' there are for your digital dollhouse.

As well as entire community of enthusiastic corporate boot lickers with a 'cozy' aesthetic.

[–] auzy1@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It takes a lot of money to make the same games for 25 years straight, change the front logo, the names of the players, make tiny tweaks and market it.

Maybe they need to start releasing Sims 2025, 2026, etc.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

I will never forgive EA for destroying Maxis.

[–] Johanno@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The problem is that they actually needed that much money for such mediocre games. They poured money into it and still made it an inferior game.

[–] auzy1@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sims was actually fun at the time... Until they did all the expansions

But, I really wish it was black and white. That was the best game

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Black & White would have worked so well with VR.

[–] auzy1@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

It worked well even without it

We shouldn't have to remove the ladder for the pool in the Sims or play with fireworks. Should be able to pick them up and throw them

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Oh I'm not disputing that the game we got was a good one, just that it seems like such an obvious concept for VR. I thought the sequel was disappointing. Focused entirely too much on warfare as the only viable strategy, and I missed the variety of wacky side quests and secrets scattered around the maps.

[–] Nilz@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They are in a lof of debt because of the buy out.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're also in a lot of debt from making dog shit for the last 15 years.

[–] TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They've been making dogshit for a lot longer than that.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

They used to have good games in addition to the dogshit ones. Now it's just the dogshit. Though to me the cutoff was 14 years ago, when they made the last Mass Effect game.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

Kind of yes, but actually no.

We just see that debt now, its explicit.

EA ... was subject to a leveraged buy out, that they sought out. They did this... because they needed cash, now.

What that means is that their internal financials were an absolute shit show... that they had, up untill that point, basically just legally lied about, hid, downplayed.

They fluffed up their balances and returns and cashflows in ways that are legal to do, but if you actually do due dilligence, you could read the writing on the wall.

Its basically the same as any other US company that got bought out / sold itself to private equity in the last 10 or 15 years.

Difference is, EA is so huge, it had to be bought out by essentially a sovereign wealth fund.

Well my days is not buying EA products are certainly coming to a middle.

KSA is staggeringly rich but can't pay for their purchase.

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 120 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Well that’s the end of EA. The owners will tear it apart and bleed it dry.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 67 points 2 days ago (3 children)

People have been predicting the death of EA for over twenty years.

Meanwhile, they release another Madden and another FIFA and another Sims and another Star Wars, then mint themselves another $7B. Nevermind that all of these games are just reskinned copies of the games they've been releasing going back to the mid-90s.

[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 46 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yesn't.

That may have been somewhat true in the past, but it is hard to articulate just how big of a hole they are in right now. The leveraged buyout has pushed EA's debt to over $20Billion USD.

They make that money back or they might not, but they are going to absolutely pillage and destroy the company in the process. The word that often follows "leveraged buyout" is "bankruptcy". It's a tale as old as corporate history.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well, the natural evolution from "keep on squeezing existing IP without inventing anything new" is ""keep in squeezing long published games without publishing any new games" .

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Finally, some good news. Maybe Saudi Arabia bought EA to burn it down and make the world a better place.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 86 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't care what they do. Even if I hadn't already been boycotting EA for 10+ years, I'd never install Saudi-owned ring-0 "anticheat" software on any of my computers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BottleBoardBakon@lemmy.ml 47 points 2 days ago

Shit company gets worse

[–] northendtrooper@lemmy.ca 44 points 2 days ago (3 children)

A lot of people are glancing over the fact that now a country is running this Video Game company. I'm not betting that the Saudis will: Open up old IPs, take care of labor costs, respect the players, not install spyware onto customer's machines and report their party affiliation or any government secrets stored on said machine.

If you didn't trust EA being run by a private company then I bet you won't trust EA being ran by a government.

[–] EarMaster@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Even worse: Jared Kushner is involved as well.

[–] FoxAlive@lemmy.zip 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Games are essentially attack vectors with kernal level access to your computer.

The united States is looking at doing something about Chinese gaming companies, yet we are okay with handing over what is essentially a back door over to the Saudis.

I just think its weird what malware we are okay with.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But the CEO’s job will be okay right?

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Just wait for the article that the CEO is getting a $700 million bonus.

[–] dellish@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I can't wait to play Battlefield 7: Saudi Victory Over The Jews.

fml

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›