this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
538 points (99.6% liked)

politics

30682 readers
2928 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 14 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

“Vote blue no matter who” bitch

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 11 hours ago

That's right.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I can’t tell if you support him or are against him

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Depends if he's blue or not

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Lfg, "Israel comes to me in my dreams" ass Haley fucking Stevens lost

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSo4_F48j1c

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 11 hours ago

Her whole schtick was as phoney as baloney. It felt like a character by a one season SNL alum from the 2010s.

I've known a LOT Michigan people, and it was a major part of my sales territory for a decade, and I never heard anyone from Michigan talk like that.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We gotta have a serious conversation about these massive dipshits who came out in droves to surrender to Israel, when the alternative was literally free healthcare and a social safety net.

[–] raze2012@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.

Now if they aren't even AIPAC funded... well that's just sad. Even a reddit mod gets a delusion of power when on a trip.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 72 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Abdul got 15899 votes in Dearborn in this primary election.

Kamala Harris got 15189 votes in Dearborn during the general presidential election.

I think that is a meaningful statistic.

[–] UnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.ca 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Well, Kamala was a woman...

And the traditional rural women predominantly vote the same as the patriarch.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 5 points 10 hours ago

Yes, and she was also a Zionist who wouldn't even talk to the people whose friends and family she promised to keep murdering. I think that was the real killer there.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hard to tell much of anything considering this is a primary vs a full blow presidential election but who knows.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 60 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That's entirely the point. Primaries, especially in non-presidential election years, are notorious for extremely low voter turnout.

The candidate in this senate primary pulled more votes than the nominee in a presidential general election.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 74 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It wasn't a blowout if you forget to look at how much money AIPAC spent.

[–] Kayday@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

$70 million, if I remember correctly

[–] kurwa@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I believe they spent $35 million on Haley Stevens, and her campaign spend $70 million total

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] raze2012@lemmy.world 14 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Citizens United was a mistake. At this rate, 2026 might have more money put into it than general elections 1-2 decades prior.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Makes sense. General elections don't matter to the donor class because, to them, an establishment neoliberal dem is only slightly more agreeable than a child raping demonic republican; but they simply will not tolerate a left-winger. Lovely bunch of humans we have running the show.

[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Michigan Dems will vote blue no matter who, we had a primary we know outlr canidates and now we unite going forward.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 38 points 1 day ago (48 children)

One can only hope; centrists tend to be pretty flaky.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago

Exactly. Centrist may choose not to vote.

load more comments (47 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (18 children)

Yeah, blue no matter who right you bunch of worthless, hypocritical assholes?

I'm stuck having to vote for Katie Hobbs who's supposedly running with a god damn Republican so you assholes better man the fuck up too.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

https://www.commondreams.org/news/abdul-el-seyed-democratic-endorsements

"Shortly after The Associated Press projected El-Sayed as the victor in the closely watched primary, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee Chair Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) released a joint statement supporting the newly minted nominee."

"Abdul El-Sayed has run an energetic campaign that inspired thousands of Michiganders across the state, with a clear focus on lowering costs and standing up for working families,” they said. “Democrats are united by a common purpose: putting a check on [President] Donald Trump by defeating his Republican enablers and taking back the Senate.”

Rep. Haley Stevens (D-Mich.), El-Sayed’s top rival for the Democratic nomination, conceded the race on Wednesday morning and offered “my full support as we work to defeat Mike Rogers this November.”

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, who had endorsed Stevens, also threw her support behind El-Sayed and all other Michigan Democratic candidates. “They’ve got my support as we fight like hell together to win in November,” said Whitmer. “Together, let’s stop MAGA Republicans so we can get to work and deliver results for the people of Michigan.”

It explicitly is "vote blue no matter who", you raging illiterate.

Maybe if you organized and formed a broad grassroots movement based around communication to catch a W, like Michiganders did, instead of being a vitriolic dickhead, you'd have better options.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 23 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I mean some of us who said that actually meant it. Despite all of the wailing, tactical voting remains the correct way to participate in first past the post elections, even for leftists.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 2 points 17 hours ago

Tactical voting from a group of people that only have propaganda to work with instead of facts means you’re just guessing.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] notsure@fedia.io 19 points 1 day ago

This man has policy ideas that are good. Policy over party, yet cool he's gonna caucus with the less crappy party.

load more comments
view more: next ›