this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2026
122 points (96.9% liked)

politics

30816 readers
2545 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

What's going on with his health. It seemed like he was knocking on death's door. Are they just hiding it better?

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 21 hours ago

Calling it a 2028 "run" instead of "overthrow" is doing democracy a disservice.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 19 hours ago

Again? He needs a new writer, he's telling the same joke over and over.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 26 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Isn't that illegal and punishable with prison time?

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

It should be. But that’s not how western nations handle political crimes, it would seem.

I’d probably support a future where the ICC can impeach a sitting president, along with another capacity somewhere for foreign states to remove our sitting president.

I’d like to see a stronger ability to sanction companies, too. Not just the people in the company, but the company itself. Like limiting the volume of power that a data center can consume, if it acts in bad faith.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You mean like pedophilia, accepting bribes and 34 other felonies?

You think anyone in the 1930s was saying, "wait, genocide is illegal Adolf!"?

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

"Not legal" does not always mean criminal.

He is constitutionally ineligible to run for a third term. He can post all the slop he wants, it doesn't change that fact.

Should he actually file to run again, the States (who actually run the elections) are within their rights to deny the application. Should some states let him run anyway, that will be challenged by voters (and perhaps by candidates). His campaign would fight those denials, and courts should just dismiss the candidacy out of hand, but some courts have made batshit crazy rulings before.

Even if all the courts rule against him, though, I am not aware of any statute that says it's illegal to say you will run in an election you might be Ineligible for. If anything, courts will uphold that as free speech.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago

Remember when some states tried to remove him from the ballot because he caused an insurrection? And the Supreme Court just said that's not allowed. I have a feeling the same will happen if he runs a third time.

[–] traxex@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

These rulings are also showing us legality means nothing unless there are people there to enforce it. Time and time again the administration has done something blatantly illegal and then caused irreparable damage while the "courts" figured it out and "stopped" them. This administration has been absolutely enlightening on the entire judicial system.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

That clause did have some genuine problems. There was no objective metric.

Do you remember when Abbott started calling the situation at the border an "invasion" of "military-age" brown men? Texas was getting ready to toss Biden off the ballot for "aiding an invasion" if Trump was forced off the ballot for insurrection.

[–] residentoflaniakea@discuss.tchncs.de 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He will MitchMcConnel the presidency and be president for life - post mortem. No one will see him and whatever dark forces are present will pull the strings. His asinine social posts will continue by LLM and this will be the justification of his existence. The supreme Court will establish his beyond 4 years / 2 term limitation. I should become a horror story writer.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Weekend at Bernie's got dark fast.

[–] Axiochus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Shoulda been Bernie 😭

[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 38 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The lettering below looks suspiciously familiar...

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago
[–] rapchee@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 day ago

I did not see it coming.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You all are missing the most obvious flex: one of his sons is going to run, on the sole platform of "My dad will really be running things, I won't even make him move out". Maybe both sons run, on a Trump/Trump ticket, only all the signs say "Trump/Trump/Trump".

Donald Trump will have his dream job: all of the power and influence (and money!) Of the Presidency, none of the actual responsibility. Why be President when you can own the Presidency?

Didn't Putin do something similar? He was term limited out of the Presidency, but got his buddy elected President, and then he got himself elected to their Parliament and became Prime Minister. He then got himself re-elected as President, then got some Constitutional things passed to ensure that he never has to give it up again.

But Donald Trump doesn't care about actually governing, so he doesn't need to run for Congress. All he has to do is install someone as the next President who is loyal to him, and him alone. What better candidate than Eric, whose only success in life is having the right parents?

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

None of his sons are charismatic enough to succeed. Even Donnie knows that.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 19 hours ago

He's going to do what Putin does and stick a puppet in office.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Of course, that's why it's Donnie's picture up there, and not Eric's. They will try to convince all of his fans that a vote for Eric is really a stealth vote for his dad. And Eric will lean into it, because he has never done anything in his life that didn't rely on his family connections.

(I keep going back to Eric because I think it's clear that he's the dumb one, and Junior is smart enough to know he would rather be VP and get to hang out with Senators doing nothing)

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 31 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I'm skeptical he'll be alive in 2028.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago

I am hopeful he won't

[–] ulkesh@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago

I’m hopeful he’ll be dead today. But that heart attack is sure taking its sweet time.

[–] Catma@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Kissinger lived until nearly 100. Evil just doesnt die

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Strom Thurmon would have gotten re elected after death.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

People thought he’d be gone already due to his condition but here we are.

[–] dudeface@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Wouldn’t be too sure, his parents lasted to 90

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Someone really ought to do it.

[–] dudeface@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You mean Obama should run against him right?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I almost want to see it because it would be hilarious if the outcome were to be that Obama beats Donvict.

Their brains broke about Obama having two terms, but they told themselves all kinds of nonsense narratives about how McCain and Romney were "RINOs", etc....seeing their god-emperor beaten by Obama would be pretty tough narrative to spin...

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

I'm gonna scream

[–] Che_Donkey@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

Not saying what, but yeah....

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago

Use AI to add the grim reaper into the background?

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 3 points 1 day ago

Going senile.

[–] Tango@piefed.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Excellent. The Dems need to run a young candidate and have her spend the entire campaign focused on discussing her own talking points and with all of her attack ads focused on disparaging JD Vance.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Presidente da Vida! Viva il Trumpo!

It's honestly surprising he doesn't wear a bunch of medals he gave himself.