this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2026
368 points (99.2% liked)

Selfhosted

61475 readers
1196 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This website made me reconsider if 99.9999% SLA and always online is really that important for lots of websites. I used to self-host my own server in my own apartment, but gave up on that after my internet provider had their first major outage that lasted almost a week. Also I didn't want to worry about the fire hazard, or the server going down when I was traveling etc.

But a solar powered server seems interesting, if the batteries could be made fire safe.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 1 points 16 minutes ago

"Hey look everyone! We never heard of grid scale batteries!"

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 13 points 2 hours ago

doesn’t every website go down when there is no power? ;)

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 hours ago

I used to work on the website for a utility company that insisted on ridiculous uptime. Our major deployments risked taking the system down for a few seconds, though in practice that never happened.

As a result, they made us do deployments starting at 3:00 in the morning since that was the least active time on the site. Fuuuuuuuuck that place.

[–] phil@openmic.social 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Interesting concept. I haven't seen lowtechmagazine before, going to have to definitely check it out.

I spin down our development environments when they have sit idle for a period of time, not at all the same but makes me think deeper about the entire concept.

Update: This is a really cool website. I see some fun projects here too that I could have my kids work on!

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 8 points 3 hours ago

I love Low Tech magazine! I have been reading them for years.

[–] Bismyth@piefed.social 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

This is actually great!
Social media sites should do this. There's never a good reason to be on [Insert Corporate Slop Social Media Website here] at 3AM.

[–] Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Never a good reason, like different timezones, different working/sleeping hours. Theres no better or worse hour for every single person.

[–] Chaf@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 hour ago

It's not like those major social media sites don't have some kind of data center (or rent one) in every "major" (population wise) timezone they operate in. Your other arguments still hold true, but I think even then it would be better for all of us if those websites went down every now and then.

[–] Bismyth@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago

How dare you come here with your sound logic and reason that makes sense

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Fire hazard...?

[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Over a period of roughly one year (351 days, from 12 December 2018 to 28 November 2019) the server was up for 95.26% of the time. This means that we were offline for 399 hours (which corresponds to 16.64 days).

Not bad at all really, at least for non-mission critical sites. I have solar and I really like it. Solar power on two barns, and a lot of my security cams run on solar. I'm not sure if it's the formatting of this site, or the grainy pictures, but it oddly reminds me of the Trojan Room coffee pot.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

I would be curious to know this uptime relative to any other self-hosted sites.

I remember Reddit and Twitter constantly suffering from uptime issues and they were far more decentralized, with modern infrastructure to match.

Is 95.2% all that far out of the realm of expectation?

[–] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Well of course you gotta think, Reddit and Twitter were also probably getting a lot more hits than Low Tech Mag 😅

[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

The part I quoted was one of their many tries. It seems now, after changing out the solar panel and battery, that they have greatly improved over 95.2%.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

95% isn't great. I run my own servers on solar and I don't think I've had more than a hourof unexpected downtime in the last 3 years, excluding the usual update reboots.

[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Well, the article did go on to provide better stats once they changed out the panel and battery:

Since then, the uptime has been 100% (March to September 2020), even though we have added a lot of content by making the website multilingual. This is due to the larger (brand new) battery but also to the better orientation of the smaller solar panel. The battery’s capacity will decline over time, so the higher storage capacity will make it last longer. If the uptime remains 100% through the winter 2020/2021, we will probably downgrade to a 20W solar panel.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It's honestly impressive what you can do with under 3W of power these days

[–] stardreamer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 hours ago

At one point in time, I was obsessed with getting a Thinkpad to the lowest power consumption possible.

I think I managed to drop it down to ~3w, with the screen and radio fully disabled.

[–] mapleseedfall@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

i love this website. The articles they wrote is always interesting

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 hours ago

There are solutions like IPFS for decentralized content hosting so downtime of a primary resource is less important.

[–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 27 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

100% uptime since the last time we turned it on!

[–] weps@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

works every time half of the time!

[–] lemuria@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The 1% of the time it's down, there's always the Internet Archive or reading your own downloaded copy.

[–] ATPA9@feddit.org 60 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

The uptime looks better than GitHubs...

[–] Gekkonen@sopuli.xyz 24 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I know this is a typo, but I'm sad Guthub isn't a food delivery company.

[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 4 points 3 hours ago
[–] drkt@scribe.disroot.org 24 points 8 hours ago

gut pull sandwich.com

gut commit -m "ate too much"
gut push

[–] eyekaytee@lemmy.world 17 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (3 children)

This was cool 5 years ago, now you can get solar panels and a home battery big enough to power this thing 24x7 without an issue, even if the sun was fully blacked out for a week

edit: a 40kwh battery would last with the power draw:

Power usage 2.62W

like over a year

[–] morto@piefed.social 1 points 16 minutes ago

Now they can get better hardware, but should they? They take seriously the low tech part, and part of being low tech is fighting against consumerism culture and keeping with what they have, which is wotking fine

[–] Gekkonen@sopuli.xyz 17 points 6 hours ago

There's a lot of articles about supply based usage vs demand based energy production on that website. The idea that it turns off every now and then is sort of part of the authors' intention of showing "we can live with some outages".

This article in particular is a good one: https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/2017/09/how-not-to-run-a-modern-society-on-solar-and-wind-power-alone/

[–] son_of_darkness@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

I think you entirelly missed the point then

[–] Shameless@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Does anyone remember when businesses would operate their websites only during business hours and then take most of the functionality offline after hours?

I'm possibly also mis-remembering my early internet years and just talking shit.

[–] AvocadoSandwich@eviltoast.org 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

This is sometimes still a thing. I know of at least one religious news organisation that takes the website offline on Sundays.

[–] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

B&H Photo will not process your order on the Jewish day of rest, it's amazing. https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/httwww.bhphotovideo.com/find/SHcalendar.jsp

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.today 2 points 4 hours ago

we did have those with BBSes for sure

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 90 points 11 hours ago (14 children)

I have never been a fan of anything above 3 nines of uptime even in a business situation.

Your business will not collapse because of 10 min of downtime a week, and if it does that is not technologies fault.

I don't even bother to track my home setup.

[–] djdarren@piefed.social 74 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

My home server is 100% up, because I never check it and that's how it works, right?

[–] jim_v@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

This reminds me of a news story from the start of Covid.

Tanzanian President, "We have zero bases of Covid!"

Rest of the Earth, "Cool beans! How did you do it‽"

Tanzany Prez, "Easy, we just didn't test for it."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_in_Tanzania

[–] hanke@feddit.nu 8 points 3 hours ago

My home server is 100% up, because I run the checks from the same machine

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 8 hours ago

I didn't turn it down, so it's obviously up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iknewitwhenisawit@fedinsfw.app 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I found the GitHub employee! 😉

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Good news, I don't work for microslop.
Bad news, I work for someone worse... :(

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Appreciate the website itself, with it's dithered low-colour PNG illustrations.

[–] morto@piefed.social 1 points 21 minutes ago

One of the best sites to browse on e-ink devices!

load more comments
view more: next ›