this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2026
684 points (99.9% liked)

Work Reform

17406 readers
1372 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

This is the evil brilliance of Conservative marketing. The American working classes have been brainwashed to think what's good for Jeffy and Zucky and Donnie is what's good for them.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 6 days ago

Abolition hurt the cotton and sugar industries, and yes, the slaving industry. There's even a song about it.

[–] Aeri@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Had the insurance industry but one throat I would slit it.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And then deny them the medical care!

[–] Aeri@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Sorry being stabbed is a pre-existing condition.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago
[–] Doom@discuss.online 2 points 6 days ago

Ain't this a free market? Whatever happened to that idea

[–] VelvetPinkOtter123@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I literally had a bunch of my comments removed for saying this same thing

Your problem isn't capitalism per-say, it's a government that supports corporations over you

Doesn't matter what system you technically have, if the government cares more about businesses than they do you, you're fucked

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

checks notes

We are fucked.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

This is all possible without asking Trump.

All the people who want this: Pick one city to move to. Then build the housing with solar cells, public transport and a hospital.

If banks don't finance this, have a lottery. One half has to stay and make money, the other half moves and builds the city. Once the city is profitable, the other half moves there, too.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Wow I never realized it was so easy, thanks

[–] plyth@feddit.org 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Where do you see the problems? I think the biggest obstacle is finding the people. Once that's solved everything else will be solved by the people who want to live in such a city.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Bill Maher did "let's flip a district" like a decade and a half ago. Lots of words accurately describe you, but "original" isn't one of them.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

People settled entire continents. I am not claiming this as my idea. I am more puzzled that people don't do it. Why was "let’s flip a district” not successful?

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Because it was a "movement" of all-talk dipshits like you.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 0 points 5 days ago

Which means I don't have to pity anybody who is stuck in their current life.

or make new banks and finance it yourself through the new institutions

[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's not even simply hurting the auto industry. People are weirdly attached to their mobile living rooms.

PuBliC TrAnSpoRt? OuR CoUnTrY Is ToO BiG FoR ThAt AnD iT SuCkS. It's FoR PoOr PeOPlE AnD ThoSe WiTh DUI. We NeEd ChEapEr GaS11!!!!1

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

Mobile death machines.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 0 points 6 days ago

And all those industries are filled with people who need those things, just like everybody else. They want them, too

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 57 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Hurt them? Hurt them? I want to DESTROY THEM!

[–] PissMissile@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What? No. We should be encouraging him.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What about all the unions who fought for healthcare?

-My dad, justifying voting for Hillary and later Biden in the primaries.

Every election it was "yes, the left have policy that would directly benefit us, but the moderates won't vote for that so I shouldn't either."

Well except when he voted Bush thinking he would get lower taxes.

[–] moustachio@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“Moderates” is always such a silly term to me. They’re not actually moderate; their beliefs are corporate extremism.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 4 points 6 days ago

Its not even a real thing. There is no contingent of voters who will vote for "means-tested subsidies to buy health insurance from 1 of 50 marketplaces based on what your family's expected healthcare needs are and employer contribution", but won't vote for free healthcare. There is no "help Israel do only a little genocide" vote.

But every time, cable news would dupe the poor man into voting for what some imaginary moderate wanted instead of policy that materially benefits everyone.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 15 points 1 week ago

Insurance should have never been an "industry"

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 13 points 1 week ago

So literally no downsides is what you are saying?

[–] mako@lemmy.today 8 points 1 week ago

Emancipation was a huge hit to the slave trade industry

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes, and?

That should mean that they can switch to doing something productive instead. It's not even bad capitalist politics.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago

forget to add all these culminate into, hurts political parties as a wedge issue/single issue.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
  • blank * industry is a threat to life on this planet.
[–] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I want nothing more than to hurt the industy and take jobs from those who perpetuate it.

Introduce UBI at the same time.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

We’re basically headed toward a dystopic authoritarian oligarchy with huge disparity. It’s gonna look like all those fictional dystopias portrayed in Elysium or Neuromancer but without all the cool tech. Yeah, we should have these social programs for people…but unless we crush the oligarchy they’ll create continuous pressure to make sure these social programs are as shitty as possible and be functionally the caricature of socialism the right wing uses for its propaganda. We’ll be second or third class citizens living in favelas or similar social housing.They won’t stop bleeding the people for more. But the thing is, if we get rid of the oligarchy we’ll not need such a huge social safety net*.

*we should have a good one anyway, but it shouldn’t be a response to the disparity created by billionaires, we should just have one by default.

OhNoAnyway.jpg