this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2026
1013 points (98.6% liked)

Comic Strips

25192 readers
2305 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

Rules
  1. πŸ˜‡ Be Nice!

    • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
  2. 🏘️ Community Standards

    • Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
    • Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
    • Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
    • Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
  3. 🧬 Keep it Real

    • Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
  4. πŸ“½οΈ Credit Where Credit is Due

    • Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
    • Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
  5. πŸ“‹ Post Formatting

    • Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
    • Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
    • When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
      βœ… Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
      ❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
  6. πŸ“¬ Post Frequency/SPAM

    • Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 πŸ–) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 πŸ–) will be removed.
  7. πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ Internationalization (i18n)

    • Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
      SΓ­, por favor [Spanish/EspaΓ±ol]
  8. 🍿 Moderation

    • We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
    • When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Banned Artists

The following artists are banned from the community.

  1. Jago
  2. Stonetoss
  3. GPrime85

It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.

Web Accessibility

Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.

When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:

Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)

Web of Links
Other Comic Communities of Interest

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tommy Siegel | Bluesky | website

TranscriptComic in 4 Panels:

Header: It’s That Easy!

Panel 1: The year is 1994. A dad with short black hair, in a blue shirt, red shorts, and white sneakers with calf high white socks, kneels with one arm resting on a knee and the other raised demonstratingly in front of a kid in a green ball cap, yellow shirt, blue pants, and green sneakers. There is a round metal trash can behind them.

Dad: Pick up your litter and save the Earth!

Panel 2: The year is 2004. Same dad, but in brown cargo shorts, brown shoes, and ankle high white socks speaking to the same kid. There is a green recycle bucket behind them.

Dad: Recycle and you can save the Earth!

Panel 3: The year is 2014. Same dad, but wearing a bike helmet, black athletic pants, and black sneakers to the same kid. A bike is behind them.

Dad: Reduce your carbon footprint and you can save the Earth!

Panel 4: The year is 2024. Same dad, but he’s in the same outfit from panel 1. There is a massive fire behind them.

Dad: Completely restructure global economic systems and you may be able to save a remnant of humanity!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 hours ago

Great comic. Good to see this is finally starting to dawn on people.

Good news is that we're facing an incredible economic crash worse than anything we've ever seen, and the degrowth of GDP is going to be great to reduce greenhouse gasses.

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 14 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

We failed them like our parents failed us

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

All generations suffer from the same issue: the system is designed so that only the narcissists make it to the top. This will repeat again for eternity if we don’t change the system, and the failure isn’t generational when we are presented with only two options that both work for the elite in some capacity.

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 hours ago

It will not "repeat for eternity", both our societies and the planet's ecosystems which we depend on all have breaking points after which they will not be able to sustain capitalism. We have a few decades until human civilization collapses if we don't overthrow the system.

[–] 5318008@lemmy.ml 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I think a random lottery for office positions is the only system I've ever heard of which can't be abused by narcissists.

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago

You're 100% right

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 25 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

The individual action PSAs were a deliberate fraud perpetrated by the worst polluters.

[–] EntheoNaut@lemmy.ml 8 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Precisely. It was strategically designed and marketed to shift the blame/responsibility from manufacturers to consumers.

It was a scam and distraction from the start created by advertising agencies.

[–] Shindo66@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

"If they knew that to save .03 a unit we are dumping this byproduct in the river, they would have our heads on a platter. Get the PR team in here" "Why dont we tell them its their fault for buying it in the first place, but never really blaming any specific product" "Yeah, its all their fault"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 15 points 16 hours ago

Just pick up that trash and YOU'LL BE SHOT IN THE FACE BY A MASKED GROUP OF PARDONED JAN 6 TRAITORS IN ALL DIFFERENT HOMEMADE ARMY MAN COSTUMES, CHARGED WITH "ULTRA LEFT WING" TERRORISM AND DEPORTED, AS AN AMERICAN CITIZEN, WITHOUT A TRIAL, FOR WOKE MARXIST CANCEL CULTURE AND DOUBLE TRANS!!!!

[–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 46 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I already reduced my carbon footprint. For some reason people get really mad when I try and blow up an oil refinery to reduce theirs.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 4 points 12 hours ago

Well if I could rely on people like you being on the jury, I just might be more willing.

[–] whereitsat@lemmy.zip 7 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

drawing attention to that is cool, i guess, but doesn't shed light on the underlying issue.

america loves victim blaming the individual rather than ever admitting that there's some kind of issue with the system or wealthy people.

every single house in america could be built on the edge of a cliff prone to landslides and someone would always come out of the woodwork to act like it's your own fault you bought it.

'shoulda lived in a shopping cart.'

[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 6 points 14 hours ago

Isn't that the whole point of the comic? None of the advice the Dad gave to the child was ever going to solve the problem. Presumably the kid tried, and the problem just kept getting more dire.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

If individual behaviour didn't matter, Canada wouldn't have 307% of global per capita emissions, and the US wouldn't have 285% while Finland only has 118% and Sweden has only 71% of the world average.

I picked those European countries in particular because they're rich, have cold winters, and have a low population density in a lot of the country.

The reality is that the US and Canada are decades behind Europe when it comes to these things. Sure, this guy in panel 2 is telling his kid to recycle, but Americans never took recycling seriously. Meanwhile in Zurich you have separate bins for green glass, brown glass, clear glass, along with the normal paper and plastic. If you don't want to recycle, you can do that, but it's going to cost you. You have to buy expensive special garbage bags to throw out anything that you don't recycle.

In panel 3 the guy is shown with a bike, but less than 0.5% of people bike to work. Meanwhile, in Finland, it's about 10% of people who commute by bike.

[–] Echo5@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I loved the recycling outposts in the apartments in Korea (they even took styrofoam, probably just burned everything anyways though), but in US I asked my local politician about recycling, even said I’d pay a couple bucks extra a month in taxes for opting in, and he said it’s been tried before but people abused the system :(. Not sure what he meant by abused but now I procrastinate taking my recycling to a center until my garage is stuffed and it’s a major chore.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 74 points 1 day ago (1 children)

tbf the solution was always the last one.

it's just that they've been stringing us along.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

But that was unimaginable to those, who promoted environmentalism, at least in the west.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Xerxos@lemmy.ml 105 points 1 day ago (22 children)

One of the most brilliant (and evil) tricks that big corporations have used is to shift the blame for climate change to normal people: just recycle, don't use plastic straws, and buy our COβ‚‚-neutral products, and everything will be fine!

While not unimportant, it's a very small change compared to the pollution of corporations and private jets. It's easy for them to pay lip service to the environment while the real pollution goes on unimpeded.

Environmentally inclined people feel like they do something and don't rally against the real problem. They just have to convince everyone to live like they do and the environment will be saved!

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It's abusive victim blaming by psychopaths

[–] WakeUpSmashPots@lemmy.today 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like "psychopath" is very dehumanizing language, the correct term is "people with antisocial personality disorder".

That's a joke by the way, lol. Not sure what the Lemmy equivalent of /s is...

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Yes. We do use /s here, as well.

[–] WakeUpSmashPots@lemmy.today 2 points 12 hours ago

Good to know!

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 11 points 19 hours ago

Billionaire oligarchs flying in to climate conferences every year on private jets by the thousands, where oil executives are regularly invited to give the keynote speeches, while not accomplishing anything policy-wise or binding to materially reduce the rate or impacts of climate change, is the epitome of greenwashing.

"What menial lifestyle changes should we tell our consumers to adopt this year to keep them off our backs?"

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

And even worse, it split us up again because if you point that out, the environmentalists are against you too. Because everything counts. Well yes, but..

[–] late_pessimistic@slrpnk.net 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Environmentally inclined people feel like they do something and don't rally against the real problem.

Actually we have already been lobbying and protesting and trying to change the system for decades.

The work might not be visible, but it's due to resource constraints, not because we are delusional and think that decreasing global CO2 emissions by 0.000000027% will fix the biodiversity loss.

[–] Xerxos@lemmy.ml 14 points 22 hours ago

Oh, I'm not saying that there are no activists anymore, just that the corporations successfully distracted large parts of the population by shifting blame to the consumers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AbsolutePain@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

While there is some truth to this, this line of thinking is a trap because it removes responsibility from the individual.

Coorporations don't pollute the world for no reason. They do it because there's too many of us consuming too much crap.

Changing the whole system (regulations, etc.) is not a safe plan. Clearly it did not work out.

Stop buying so much crap online.

[–] darthelmet@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Look at it from the other way around: Capitalism is dependent on endless growth to function. To that end, consumerism is one tool by which capitalists sustain that endless growth rather than the problem in and of itself. It would be no good for them if people were able to just buy a thing when they needed it and it lasted a really long time. So they find ways to induce demand. A shiny new phone every year with planned obsolescence, advertising and other forms of cultural influence that equate happiness with disposable consumption, monopolistic tactics to crush alternatives, lobbying for government policies to limit alternatives and promote financial conditions that encourage consumption over saving, etc.

You can still say that at the end of all of this people ultimately "decide" to consume or not, but... what is that accomplishing exactly? Is our plan to just hope that every single individual person decides to lower their consumption, no matter how difficult or burdensome that might be given their situation? Especially considering how lopsided the actual emissions are towards the very wealthy? And if people started doing that... do you think corporations don't aggressively push back in whatever way they can? Because that plan isn't working either.

The "personal responsibility" angle isn't actually taking responsibility, it's just acting smug and accepting our doom is inevitable, but not your fault because you already "did your part." Get organized or we all die. It's that simple. It won't be easy, but it's our only real option.

Notably, this is all a very daunting task. While we need national and international action, that isn't the only thing that matters. Activism in your community can help too. Plenty of stuff happens at the level of cities, towns, and counties. Roads and transportation. Zoning laws. Any gov or HOA requirements around grass and gardening. Tree planting. The gov's relationship with utility providers. Fighting back against destructive development projects like data centers, parking lots, etc.

This is going to depend a lot on what the town is like though. Some places are going to be too poor to build any infrastructure projects like trains without funding from higher levels of gov. Some states have passed laws which try to limit local gov's ability to enact environmental legislation. In some places it might be a pretty big uphill battle politically to make any big changes.

Ultimately the important thing is to gather enough people who can be engaged in the process that whatever your goals are become achievable. And hey, going back to the consumer side of this, if you have a lot of people, a boycott or strike becomes more of an effective option.

So to echo your final dismissive line: Go touch grass (then rip it out and replace it with native plants). This is coming from someone who's been dealing with chronic depression for years and is finally making an effort to get out there and connect with people again. If I can do it, you can. (Maybe, idk your circumstances, maybe you have a condition even worse than mine.)

[–] AbsolutePain@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

No, I actually agree with what you are saying to a great extent.

But the thing is, I still believe what I originally said is ALSO true.

I suspect the most effective thing is a combination of both approaches: personal resposibility + organization at various levels of society. Both are necessary, I believe.

[–] KryptonNerd@slrpnk.net 5 points 18 hours ago

Additionally, those corporations aren't made up of robots. People work there and make the decision to cause this damage. It being done at work doesn't absolve them of their responsibility.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago

What was the post on lemmy earlier today? The solutions are very simple, the problem is the people profiting off keeping things broken.

[–] SwissArmyKazoo@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Reduce your carbon footprints and break kntondata centres servers with a aluminum baseball bat.

[–] huey_m@piefed.social 18 points 1 day ago (7 children)

"Just don't use AC (during a heat wave killing thousands) and you can save the Earth!" (2026)

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί