this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2026
287 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

88546 readers
3506 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 91 points 1 month ago (9 children)

If Streamers were smart, they'd lock pricing and change it for new signups.

Their problem is numbers retention. People would hesitate to cancel if their $8 plan would have to be 15/month or more to restart.

Moving everyone up, just pushes people to cancel, and they'll be even more unlikely to come back if prices keep going up

[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago

It’s not like they don’t know what they’re doing. They studied all kinds of business strategies diurig their “International business studies” or whatever the fuck they did. The C-suite simply doesn’t care about long term retention, they want their bonuses for this year and the next. They know perfectly well they will be replaced in a few years time anyway, whether it’s because profits are not increasing as much as the shareholders want or whether the profits have gone up because of price raises, but down again because customers left.

But in the second scenario they will get a whole lot more bonuses than in the first. So this is what consumers get: enshittification.

[–] vladmech@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That’s what Dropout does, and while I’m not likely to cancel anyway because I love their content, I’m even less likely knowing if I left and came back not would be on the higher sub price

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I did not know that, but I just signed up a little over a month ago.

But yeah, even if I run out of their backlog, I'm probably going to keep that active anyways

Super weird it's basically College Humor legally, but they're doing a really good job.

[–] Carl@anarchist.nexus 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Super weird it's basically College Humor legally, but they're doing a really good job.

Yeah, the transformation from College Humor to Dropout is honestly a masterclass in business (and marketing) management. I fully believe that it’s the kind of thing that college marketing majors will be writing papers on in the future.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's a 2$ increase from 13$ to 15$. I feel like most people don't care and it's more of a boiled frog situation than anything else. I doubt anyone is seriously going to cancel for an extra 2$ unless they were already planning too tbh.

[–] TVA@thebrainbin.org 9 points 1 month ago

Also, don't most people mentally round that up anyways? $13 was already $15 as far as I was concerned, so, this is just raising it what what I basically thought I was already paying. If they raise it again though, it's going to $20 which is gonna be a tougher pill to swallow.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The problem is that everyone who wants a subscription probably already has one. New customers aren't born fast enough to keep up with line go up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Most streamers at least have annual subscriptions at a discount. Netflix is month-to-month only, which is just asking for churn.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jtrek@startrek.website 4 points 1 month ago

They're not trying to make a good product. They're trying to get their short term gains.

Normal capitalist bullshit where a handful of people (who probably don't even do any work) make decisions and keep almost all the profits.

[–] dudeface@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

That sounds like terrible economics when you have hundreds of millions of customers who will likely just accept it

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The cost in electronic services is in acquisition; the nominal cost to deliver services to a paying subscriber is lower than acquiring a new one.

Yes you would flatten your margin with existing customers by not hiking their rates (or not as much) but pretending there won't be defection assumes near monopoly--which the US has permitted largely for the last 4 decades.

Cell phone companies made it super easy to leave by only offering good discounts to new customers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Then you don't understand why long term reliable customers are better than intermittent ones...

Which means you don't know anything else about business, and are just going off vibes

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I'm sure they tested it and found that enough customers would stay to make it profitable.

Consumers, especially Apple users, accept higher prices. It's baffling to me but true.

In 2014, Netflix was $8/month. It's now 12 years later and Netflix is $20/month.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 78 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Damn, I’ll have to keep not subscribing!

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not subscribing 20% harder.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I feel 20% less-subscribed (80% of 0 is 0)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 29 points 1 month ago

In related news, piracy of AppleTV exclusives will go up by about 20%...

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 month ago

🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Radarr, sonarr, prowlarr (with flaresolverr) and qbittorrent tied to a gluetun instance. Deploy jellyfin, and these rate increases instantly become irrelevant.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Flaresolverr was not working all that well for me. I switched to byparr and now I'm using trawl, which seems to fail less.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 16 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Sucks. Still my favorite streaming service because of all the high quality science fiction shows and no ad tier.

So far they haven’t cancelled any of the shows I’ve been super excited for either. It’s not like scamazon or netsux where they do a season and it’s awesome but oh, no! It isn’t #1 for a month on launch!… better cancel it.

It’s still just a billionaire owned company though and likely to do what everyone else does eventually. Can’t wait for the next thing to come along and nuke ads again.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ulkesh@piefed.social 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

streaming was never sustainable venture anyways. 8 episode for shows makes them forgettable.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

The irony of the company world-famous for being over-priced having the streaming service which most justifies a price increase.

[–] yumyumsmuncher@feddit.uk 9 points 1 month ago

Yawns in Stremio

[–] spacegoat@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I’ll seed another 2 or 3 of their shows permanently now

[–] yggstyle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Woof. I wasn't aware apple intelligence was that bad.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

They are good but there is no easticity for me, the price increasing just makes me unsubscribe

[–] goatinspace@feddit.org 7 points 1 month ago
[–] realitista@lemmus.org 6 points 1 month ago

Well one month a year maybe

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

me

but I choose not to pay for it anymore because the product is less convenient than alternative methods

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

That's strange, still $0 for me.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Oh well guess I'll continue using streamio until I can be bothered to set up my jellyfin & friends

load more comments
view more: next ›