this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2026
416 points (97.9% liked)

politics

31022 readers
2767 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think he might just have a fetish for losing.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 175 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Please be the republican nominee.

[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 139 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Keep in mind that is exactly what I thought when Trump announced his candidacy in 2015.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 18 points 6 days ago (8 children)

Hmmm.

You make a good point.

On the other hand, look at the history of presidents and their parties. It ALWAYS swaps parties unless there is a particularly popular vice president. Literally, back to Washington.

The US isn’t like Japan where the LDP wins consecutive elections for decades on end.

The republican candidate was GOING to win in 2016.

We are now in a time of chaos. I feel Dems will probably sweep the midterms and maybe win in 2028, but it’s unclear. We’ve only had one nonconsecutive president before.

I wouldn’t put money on James (Vance).

[–] BonsaiBoo@lemmy.world 36 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Remember when the Supreme Court interfered in the presidential election because of hanging chads and effectively kept Gore from winning, thus leading somehow to the death of Harambe and bringing us to the bad place dimension where everything always gets worse and almost always in the worst way possible?

Yeah.. like you said, history likes to repeat itself.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 days ago

Nominees don't matter anymore. They won't let anyone who will make a meaningful difference in. If someone meaningful gets in, they'll be blocked from making any changes.

we lack the pitchforks and the will to do jack all about anything.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] stretch2m@infosec.pub 33 points 6 days ago

Hegseth in a debate. Now that I'd like to see. What a putz.

[–] ulkesh@piefed.social 66 points 6 days ago (3 children)

You guys laugh, but there seems to be enough wannabe-macho small-penis dudebro idiot voters that could get the loser elected. Do not assume it won't happen.

[–] ruan@lemmy.eco.br 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

I'm not from the USA, neither an English native speaker, but is Peter Hegseth in any way charismatic? I find Trump totally repulsive, however I can understand his "charism" that attracts people to vote for him when he's there mumbling his rampts and narcistic histories. So far, since 2025, that I can remember, anytime I saw any video of Peter Hegseth speaking he seems to have the same charism as a door.

This, would, of course, be important for a presidential candidate If there is any "democracy" left during the election time, since Trump's popularity is decreasing, his government does not seem too promising on having "good results" to show when the election time comes, therefore the transfer of charism and therefore votes that Trump would be able to execute would be limited, and the new candidate would have to work on his own.

Given the current state of affairs, as an external observator and not too familiar with USA real politics dynamics, I find it's easier for Trump and republicans to continue the rampamt breaking of laws and just really push for a 3rd term, as he's been publicly "teasing" since his 2024 campaign...

P.S.: Just to finish up, there's also the fact that Trump is old as f*, and seems to be becoming more senile by the minute (i.e.: his almost at the age his dad was diagnoses with dementia iirc), so maybe the thing is they would just be forced to move on from him and the "3rd term" thing would really just not come to fruition due to bad timing (Trump going full demented, dying, etc...). Or maybe if his popularity keeps going down, who knows if the democracts can obtain any majority in the midterm elections and put up an impeachment on both houses this time, this would also chance the outlook of things and force the republicans to choose a new candidate sooner than later.

[–] decolo@piefed.social 9 points 6 days ago

The only thing hegseth has going for him is his 'TV look' and willingness to eat shit if it owns the libs (our conservatives have no shame, and love embarrassing themselves to get a reaction from 'the left')

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] teelin134@programming.dev 59 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Guy who lost a war with Iran wants to be president.

Must be the type who has failed upwards his entire life.

[–] theedqueen@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago

I mean so far that has been very true

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pofski@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So this is his Dmitry Medvedev?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] arotrios@lemmy.world 56 points 6 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 5 days ago

Over trump's dead body (literally).

Trump is not planning to willingly leave in 2029.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

president of fifa maybe.

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Gonna try and pull a Putin with Trump?

Take Trump as his running mate, then if he wins resign so Trump can be President again.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

That is against the constitution. The 12th amendment says if a person is ineligible for president they are also ineligible for VP

Only thing possible is running for congress and then being speaker of the house, then both VP and President resign.

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ah you're right. I had to go back and read the specific text. Been so long since I have sat down to read any of it I had forgotten that was covered.

I stand corrected

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

There’s still merit to what you said. Trump is a convicted felon. That alone he should have been impeached and removed but they let it slide. If they let that go who’s to say they don’t let other stuff go too.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 32 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Do it! Dems need any help they can get.

[–] clanker_victim_555@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Isn't that what they thought they were doing when they talked about Trump so much? Turning the joke candidate into this

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That man deserves life in prison for his war crimes.

[–] 0li0li@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago (4 children)

So you're saying he's got a shot?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Wonder if he and Trump are going for a Putin/Medvedev situation.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Didn't Putin allegedly get a little mad at this situation ? Trump couldn't mentally survive not being officially the big guy for a day.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That is likely true. I can't imagine him calling anyone else "sir" or "Mr. President."

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

That's why the felon in chief flew off like a gigantic baby before President Biden was ushered in.

The delicate flower couldn't even deal with it for a few hours because he's a terrible human being.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Hilarious, because we all know it's just going to be the orange pedophile again.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] blastosist@lemmy.zip 15 points 6 days ago

President Kegsbreath..

[–] abc@suppo.fi 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Oh fuck, I need to keep my wallet closed. Last time a person who obviously cannot get elected became the GOP candidate, I bet a lot of money against his win. :(

Fortunately, I did the same 4 years earlier when the same happened :)

[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The boy ain’t even fit for T-ball.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Trump vs Hegseth, who is worse?

I vote tie.

[–] Kayday@lemmy.world 60 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Hegseth is worse because he will live longer.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's a valid point. I don't think he could win though. He's a drunk.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I recall hearing the same thing about George W. Bush and we all know how that turned out

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 26 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Also, surely there’s no way the American people would vote for Trump twice

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Does Pete Hegseth’s liver know it’s expected to make it all the way to 2028?

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 6 days ago

The hateful ones live the longest.

[–] kukukese@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

Iran war didn't go well, now he planning to be the boss? Well, let's see how it goes for him.

[–] Nonprophet@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Wow. Cocaine really is bad for you, huh?

[–] falynns@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Hey you leave cocaine out of this.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 15 points 6 days ago

We all thought the current president was going to lose in 2016 when he was dicking up the republican primaries. Don't discount these hacks. RFK would be the strongest challenger if not for his speech impediment, how is he going to run a nazi rally with that voice?

Vance won't get it, Rubio won't get it.

[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 days ago

Completely normal for a genocidal empire that murders schoolgirls with impunity.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Actually, I hope he does run. He would make it easier for progressive to win because everyone hates him.

[–] Tenniswaffles@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 6 days ago (6 children)

What are you talking about? You do realise this is the country that elected Trump twice, right?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SaintNectar@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago

Postponing release of Epstein files as long as possible for the pedolord

load more comments
view more: next ›