I really had hope on proposal A to be taken... i have faith in debian devs judgement and proposal B feels closer to "keep the door open" than to embrace it.
A sad day anyway.
this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2026
42 points (95.7% liked)
Technology
87636 readers
5452 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Talk about a loss for all those who voted for irresponsible use if AI /s
No, not Debian!
I'm not mad at the decision in the least, I'd just be curious to see what "responsible use" translates to, and how it's enforced.
Wait, what's with the rational thinking! We're supposed to hate Debian now because any approach that isn't zero-tolerance to AI is evil. Security will escort you out now.
"The Debian Project nevertheless expects that all contributions submitted to Debian, regardless of how and with which tools they were produced, satisfy the same standards of quality, correctness, maintainability, and legal compliance. The use of a generative AI tool does not diminish the contributor's responsibility for the work they submit. Contributors are expected to understand, review, test, and, where appropriate, modify AI-assisted output before incorporating it into Debian. "
Basically, however it was written, you're still responsible for it.
And that's the only thing that is actually relevant. Using AI tools does not absolve of any responsibility, regardless of area. Speaking of which, why isn't Huggingface suing OpenAI into oblivion? I've slowly come to the conclusion that this "hack" was a PR-stunt to allow OpenAI to pause training without having to admit that they had to stop anyways because they run out of cash.
Every story you read about how their AI is “so powerful it’s scary” or where they characterize the AI as “going rogue” or some other dumb shit like that is manufactured in an attempt to impress investors
Well HuggingFace won’t sue them now because they’re owned by Nvidia
You can't stop AI.
Maybe we can't but climate change could.