this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2026
167 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

87826 readers
4806 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

About a week or two ago, I started noticing that I could no longer copy the clean links for search result hits on Google. I thought it was maybe some quirk of a browser I was using, but today when trying to copy a link to a Youtube video, I realized it was actually rolled out globally (it seems).

Basically instead of getting a
https://youtube/. com/watch?v=-ed6UeDp1ek link now through google, (spaced out link to avoid AutoMod) you will get
https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAES<rest-of-encrypted-blob-containing--versionByte-keyID-cipherText>

The article describes the change in technical detail, and mentions a fix, but the author has kept it private for now so Google doesn't patch it up (like they probably will or have for this workaround relying on the "Translate Page" feature with a different Browser Language selection [Twitter Link, Aug 27]).

Why it will probably be patched:

Surprised there's no post about it here already.
Only Hackernews article I could find (4 days ago):
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49506338

Edit: It seems to matter a lot whether your network is deemed "spammy" or problematic by Google for the encrypted URLs to kick in, even if you're logged out. Funnily enough my google searches went back to normal a few hours after I posted this. So a logged out session might get the regular, unencrypted links if your IP network has a good rating on Google's end. Mine often runs into captchas and the like, so it makes sense why I'd be targeted by this new change.
Then again, I just tested on my mobile cellular on a logged out search, and I still have the goto's. Can't really control that.

top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cx40@piefed.ca 11 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I got this too a few weeks ago and couldn't find any information on how to convert the address back to normal. I guess it makes sense if most people don't get those results. My fix was to just use a different search engine.

fyi, I got it while I was logged in.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 52 minutes ago

If you are in android, try the URLCheck from the F-droid store.not sure if works with this, but it work with SoundCloud that do something close

[–] Seimhe@lemmy.world 19 points 4 hours ago (5 children)

Surprised nobody has mentioned Ecosia yet. Web searches there are responsible for planting 250,000,000 trees. I can’t think of a better justification for using a search engine.

[–] Danitos@reddthat.com 8 points 1 hour ago

Just a heads up, Ecosia relies on you clicking on Microsoft and Google provided ads for its revenue.

From there FAQ:

Do we plant trees if we don’t click on ads?

Like other search engines, we make money when people click on the ads shown in our search results. [...]

How does Ecosia compare to other search engines?

[...] We provide industry standard search results together with our partners Google and Bing. [...]

[–] onionsinmypores@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I just tried Ecosia again after a long while (I last tried it around sometime in early 2020/21) and it seems a lot nicer and better than before. I'll use it for a little bit then :$

[–] Seimhe@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Good on you for trying

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I love ecosia.

STOP USING GOOGLE PRODUCT A FFS THEY ARE SHIT.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

They use Bing and google on the back end.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 7 points 46 minutes ago

Sure, a lot of other search engines do. I believe ecosia is the one building their own index though.

Kagi ia my favorite. Finds what I actually need like its 08 again.

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Looks like they have a browser too. Anyone know if it's chromium?

[–] Seimhe@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago
[–] alakey@piefed.social 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Stopped using them after being pestered by cloudflare garbage every 2nd visit despite having cookies enabled for it.

[–] Seimhe@lemmy.world -4 points 2 hours ago

Gods forbid we be inconvenienced in the slightest.

[–] stevles@aussie.zone 82 points 5 hours ago (7 children)

Duck is as good as Google was before they got gimped by laws and insane levels of advertising. Have been using it religiously for months, no issues.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 1 points 30 minutes ago

I've been using duck for at least 3 years, probably closer to 6 or 7. When I first used it, its searches were okay, but if I couldn't find what I was looking for a quick trip to Google would fix that. I felt like it improved slightly over some time, but also Google got a lot worse. Now with the AI proliferation, I never bother going to Google, and duck is still better than it was a year or two ago. Their AI has about a 20 or 30% success rate for me, but I just use it as a top search if I use it at all. I would love it if the results didn't change when I run the same search 2 minutes apart, though.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 25 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Kagi user for over two years now, can recommend if you’re not against paying for quality search.

[–] Marthirial@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

The future of search engines is in the settings. Allowing you to control how you search is the only weapon against the direction Google imagine we all should find stuff online.

Kagi is the only search engine who has embraced this and they get my money for it.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago

Startpage is another alternative if you use more than the free searches Kagi gives you. I usually reserve my Kagi searches for when other engines like Startpage, Qwant, DDG, etc. have failed me.

[–] refreeze@lemmy.world 17 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Maybe its just me, but I find I get way more useless seo blog spam results using DuckDuckGo.

[–] vestigeofgreen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

DDG uses Bing's index. I assume Bing doesn't nerf AI in rankings as I get so many slop AI SEO sites that I don't get on an equivalent Google search. I used DDG itself before like 2024, but now I reflexively add !g if I don't think !w will work.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

Ddg used to give non bubble results, it was their thing. Now its sucks and is location based even when disabled. DDG went to the dogs years ago.

Qwant

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

DDG NoAI site seems to help.

[–] Pistachio@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Forgive the ignorance, but what is !g and !w? And is it added at the end of the search or...?

[–] Techranger@infosec.pub 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

They are search flags for DDG that direct your search to Google or Wikipedia, respectively.

[–] ZeroCool@piefed.ca 1 points 35 minutes ago

Yep! There are also a lot of other bangs. For example, !rt will redirect the search query to rotten tomatoes. It’s a pretty neat feature.

[–] MaskedNybbles@piefed.social 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

DuckDuckGo has the concept of predefined bangs, in which a search prepended by a bang—a !, followed by one or more letters or characters and a space—redirects a search to another site. Some other sites have adopted the concept. More information can be found at https://duckduckgo.com/bangs.

[EDIT] !g and !w will take you to Google and Wikipedia, respectively.

[–] soratoyuki@piefed.zip 6 points 4 hours ago

Same. I've been using DDG as my default for years, but it's main strength for me is using !g to redo the search after not finding anything good the first time.

[–] Bumrocky@lemmy.world 30 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This. Can't tell you the last time I used Google directly.

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

A few days ago when I was converting an old windows desktop to Linux I hit Google on accident (Firefox default).

On the first page I got 2 traditional search results. They were links to AI slop sites. The entire rest of the page was full of useless crap.

[–] bad1080@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago

true, the only thing i sometimes have to go back to google is for an image search

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Ddg always does a "word1 OR word2 OR word3" search for me, which is useless half of the time and always annoying. Did i set a wrong option or something?

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 hours ago

Kagi and Startpage are better.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I am not sure how they "clean" it. If you put in a youtube link or amazon, they can easily clean it because they just need to remove everything after the ?

E.g, https://youtu.be/dQw4w9WgXcQ becomes https://youtu.be/dQw4w9WgXcQ

However, by google doing this, you're forced to check the link to see what the redirection even is. By the time you click to share that, you're already tracked.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 8 points 4 hours ago

You’ve probably not seen it. It only happens when you’re logged out.

Heh, I haven't seen it because I don't use google.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Glad we have stuff like Startpage and Kagi, which are both better than Google anyways. There's also Qwant, but it's not as good as Kagi or Startpage.

[–] kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] onionsinmypores@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

I wasn't aware of Qwant. It seems to build its own index instead of relying on other providers (great), and has proper backing to be a viable competitor in something so big (the French government seems to endorse it; along with institutional use in EU parliament?).
I just tested it and unfortunately got a 403 however (FORBIDDEN). Though I was behind an endpoint of a very popular VPN for some testing, that sucks regardless.

Actually, before I could post this, I tried the search refresh and it worked somehow.
To test again I switched to another server of the same VPN provider (same selected country) and tried searching. Same error, which didn't go away after doing the refresh. So they might have some sort of spam prevention measure which eases itself automatically, but I feel like it could definitely be implemented better if that's the case.

Edit: Yep, if you sit on that 403 page for 5-6 minutes without doing anything and then hit the relaunch your search button, things work as intended afterwards.

[–] tordenflesk@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

URL parameters were a mistake.

[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago

Wish granted. All you now have is https://www.google.com/goto with hidden HTTP POST parameters.