this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2026
942 points (99.7% liked)

politics

31474 readers
2523 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The families of US soldiers who have died in the US-Israeli war against Iran are battling to ensure they receive appropriate pay and benefits for their loved ones.

Libby Klinner, a widow, wrote on social media that the US air force had deemed her ineligible for additional benefits following the death of Major Alex Klinner, her 33-year-old husband, because Congress had not officially declared war.

He was one of six crew members of a KC-135 refuelling aircraft that crashed in western Iraq in March while supporting US strikes against Iran.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 152 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Reminds me of this:

An ex-convict gave horrific insight into serving in the Russian army, saying his officers refused to collect the dead bodies of soldiers from the battlefield so that the Russian military wouldn't have to pay their families, according to The New York Times.

In an interview, the soldier who served in one of the Russian Ministry of Defense's convict units — who was identified as "Aleksandr" — told the Times he was ordered not to collect the bodies of his fellow troops.

He told the Times that officers could register the men as "missing in action," meaning their families couldn't collect compensation for them being killed in battle.

One shitty dictator starting a completely unwarranted war doing the same thing as another shitty dictator running a completely unwarranted war.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Give Putin some credit. He's doing this much more intelligently. He maintains a plausible pretense to not pay out death benefits while Trump just goes "No".

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Putin's Ukraine adventure has been an abject failure.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 110 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've said it forever: Screwing over veterans is more American than apple pie. We've been doing it since the American Revolution.

I can't imagine President Pedophile being the one to change that. He doesn't even care enough to pretend.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He actively distains troops and veterans.

[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

He’s a draft dodger himself. They’re only pawns in his scheme to enrich himself and the capital class. It’s been the same with every president since WWII.

This is what happens when you prop your economy up on war and petroleum. You have to fight constant wars to maintain it. You have to keep heating up the planet until it’s unliveable.

The Great Depression proved that capitalism is a bubble that can’t sustain itself without constant exploitation of fossil fuels and the military-industrial complex. The second hit took place with the oil shortages and stagflation of the 1970s.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 92 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If it’s not officially a war, what happens if a combatant chooses not to engage?

I suspect they’d be court martialled as if it were refusing a wartime order.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 75 points 1 month ago (3 children)

... That might be the excuse they're using.

The reality is that they don't have the money because they spent it on bombing schools for young girls.

fuckers need to fuck right off to the fuckerville composting center.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] flandish@lemmy.world 46 points 1 month ago (43 children)

please stop joining the military

load more comments (43 replies)
[–] Z745812939054@lemmy.zip 44 points 1 month ago (2 children)

and they'll still vote for pedo-in-chief

[–] Craccoon@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)

And claim they "support the troops" all the same.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MahouOwl@piefed.zip 37 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Think about the bright side: If all countries stop using the term "war", then we've achieved world peace!! /s

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You jest, but this is exactly what trump would do.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Leviathan@fedinsfw.app 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Pentagon & GOP: Fuck you for your service.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Military proceeds to vote GOP

At some point you have to lose compassion for idiots voting for the leopards party

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 13 points 1 month ago

Some of you may die, but it's a sacrifice I am willing to make

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Imagine joining the US military.

[–] ZeroCool@piefed.ca 32 points 1 month ago

This should not surprise anyone. We've known Trump has nothing but contempt for our service members for years. It wasn't even limited to his comments about John McCain's five years as a POW either...

Trump: Americans Who Died in War Are ‘Losers’ and ‘Suckers’ published by The Atlantic on Sept 3rd 2020.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (14 children)

Congress can basically make "non wars" into wars for benefits.

OEF and OIF cover post 9/11 up to like 2010 in most of the middle east.

It could be fixed right now, but trump and the Republicans won't.

But the real solution has always been giving everyone the benefits disabled vets get

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 month ago (8 children)

You also can't lose a war if it isn't a war! 😅

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So they are eating slightly more healthy than someone eating boot soles as only meal of the day, they are being deployed for months without rest and they are dying in combat (or combat-related operations) BUT they are not at war so them and their families can't get benefits from it BUT ALSO they can't return home because they not at war but they are at war at the same time (which is not a war because the Congress didn't say so).

Are you trying to piss off the army and make the people with weapons turn against you? Because this is how you piss off the army and make the people with weapons turn against you.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Are you trying to piss off the army and make the people with weapons turn against you? Because this is how you piss off the army and make the people with weapons turn against you.

They're gambling that the American people, including the soldiers, are too atomised and too docile. Just like unions in other exploitative industries are becoming increasingly rare. I think they're probably correct, they ain't gonna do shit but accept it. You've gotta be constitutionally a bootlicker to join the military anyway. Those people don't have it in them to stand up for themselves unless it's "against" their wife and kids. Maybe you'll get an occasional guy losing it and shooting up his colleagues, the traditional way to do it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DidIReallySayThat@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I am not a fan of the military, but man, Hegseth and Trump are driving people away in droves with this kind of crap.

Oh well.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The department of war, at war? How ridiculous.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You all elected a conman and then act surprised after being conned?

MAGA winning all over the place!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

JD Vance gets asked about the widows case and he responds to the journalist "send me her contact info so I can discuss it with her" as if he isn't the second most powerful person in his country and already has full access to all of the info but doesn't care. If they have to start paying out benefits to dead soldiers it might become more clear how many service members have actually died.

There are likely more fatalities of American soldiers but they are hiding them behind mission secrecy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pbhj@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't know ... they followed the obviously illegal orders to go to war without congressional approval. They betrayed their oath to the constitution and favored Trump instead. Getting stiffed by Trump, as everyone expects of Trump, seems hardly something we should care about. Trump called them suckers, they chose to turn their backs on USA and follow Trump. It is of course sad when anyone gets hurt, but being willing participants in an unlawful and unjust war that is only about moving the stock market to make Trump rich ... when Trump has betrayed the constitution practically every day ...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frunch@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So are they going to rename the Department of Defense again?!

I can't fucking believe this. Well, i can because 🍊☝️

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Godric@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Fucking disgusting Russia-tier semantics.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ClownStatue@piefed.social 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I know people frown on “that other site,” but there’s an excellent, and sadly incomplete (I suspect), listing of all the ways The Idiot and his administration have gleefully fucked over veterans.

Reddit

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No, right, it's just a Special Military Operation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

When Vance was asked about this at a press conference, he asked the reporter for the widow's contact information (because the Pentagon doesn't have it?), and assured that she would get everything she's entitled to.

What do you want to bet that she'll receive a visit from some military goons, who will tell her that she will get ALL that she is entitled to, which is NOTHING, because he didn't die in an official war, and if she doesn't shut the fuck up about it, she'll be arrested and deported to Africa for being an undocumented alien?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's a really stupid idea to upset the military while they're on active duty. Well, America might get their first military uprising.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 15 points 1 month ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CactusEcho@piefed.social 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

is it a "special military operation"?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SalmonTractor@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Since its inception, the US government has never liked paying soldiers for war. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Mutiny_of_1783

Alexander Hamilton didn't even want to pay the IOUs back, until he decided that many were owned by investors that had bought them from soldiers. The quote was something to the effect of, "those investors are true Americans and they should get their money." The Dollop podcast has a good 4-parter on Hamilton that covers that and other issues.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›