Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
Holy fuck, yes, now let's close the rest all around the world:o
In my small town the police are responsible for half of the shooting deaths in the last 5 years. There hasn't been many, but still.
Plot twist, the other half were people defending themselves from being shot at or assaulted by the cops!
I hope you never get that wish. Some things need a proper fix instead of discarding.
this... police are needed, but they need dreal oversight and actual punishments if and when they turn into criminals.
And be massively downsized. The funding needs to go to different areas or at least specialties for response.
I too would hate a world with no police but I could easily get behind practically anything proposed short of that.
You're going to need to discard the current system to get that.
De~~fund~~militarize the police
There’s no fixing the American police system. It has rotten roots, slave patrols and the control of enslaved people, and generations of reform haven’t changed the basic model. Armed thugs with a license to kill whose primary job is to capture and return humans to enslavement.
Obviously you still need a way to prevent crime and respond to dangerous people. So replace it with a modern, community based system: nonviolent mental health responders, trained deescalation professionals, specialized violence response units, community patrols, and civilian traffic enforcement. Leave as much initial crime prevention and intervention as possible to the community instead of defaulting to armed police.
Then build a much smaller “police” force whose job is strictly serious violent crime, major investigations, and situations that actually require an armed response.
You stop treating every social problem, traffic violation, mental-health crisis, and petty offense like it needs a person with a gun and the power to arrest you. You stop feeding nearly as many people into the prison system, and you dramatically reduce the opportunities for police shootings, abuse, and corruption.
Some things need a proper fix. Sometimes the proper fix is admitting the existing institution is the thing that needs to be discarded.
My state finally did something right. I'm shocked
Texas is a big place, a lot of greedy ignorant sour people there, but a lot a good people too. Same can be said for anywhere it's just Texas is big and there is a lot of wealth there.
Well, it's more about the people in charge doing the right thing regarding the police, not about the citizens.
I didn't even know we had a dedicated police oversight org. I always thought it was just a function of the state troopers.
which makes me wonder what other heinous shit this crooked department did - look at texas, lol... look at ken paxton alone... I'll bet there's a lot more stuff they're hoping to bury.
And right there between Waco, Tyler, and Dallas?! Talk about a part of Texas that LOVES punishing the poor and mentally unstable. It used to make me so sad to drive to visit my siblings at Baylor; there's this strange cult-vibe you get where people get more holier-than-thou while more openly advocating for killing unhoused people, and cheering when they see someone in tattered clothes getting arrested.
I'm as shocked as you are.
And its not even Uvalde lol there are so many useless police departments across the country.
All of them. If they use Flock, they are actively damaging the public for decades to come. All that data will be used to train AIs and automate the torment of generations to comes.
When was the last time a cop made someone's day better?
I’m sure governor Abbott will find a way to overrule this. He’ll probably use his “police budgets can only go up!” law or something.
The city didn't make the decision. The Texas commission on law enforcement (TCLE) did.
The mission of the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement, as a regulatory State agency, is to establish and enforce standards to ensure that the people of Texas are served by highly trained and ethical law enforcement, corrections, and telecommunications personnel.
Thanks for mentioning that. I did read the article, but that went totally over my head.
a regulatory State agency, (..) to establish and enforce standards to ensure that the people of Texas are served by highly trained and ethical law enforcement
Sounds like something Abbot and Paxton would never allow tbh. I'm sure at least one of them have tried to shut it down or at least completely defang it.
They replaced the city police with county police. The county will probably need to hire a few more officers. And what do you know - 5 people were just freed up in Henderson!
Police duties in Trinidad are being transferred to the Henderson county sheriff’s office until a permanent solution is found.
Remove police... and replace with other police, until more police. So a nice moment of accountability but not a policy shift.
To be fair, if you live outside the city limits, the policing always defaults to the county sheriffs dept.
Oh stop.
Democrats leapt on the "omg they want to abolish all police forever!" Bandwagon as soon as they noticed an opportunity to abandon BLM.
My local Township police department was closed down after the vote to renew the millage (taxes to fund it) failed over a decade ago. Now we just have the local County police coming through instead.
Not every little town needs its own police department. Shame about how that gets them covered by elected sheriffs instead.
I know this town. Maybe it’s gotten worse over the years but you NEVER wanted to drink the tap water regardless.
There is something about "rural" that just seems to attract those types of people, but in particular, "SE of Dallas" seems to be extra-shitty.
My dad lives in Lancaster, south of Dallas, and it's generally not too back. But Wilmer and Balch Springs, both "southeast" of Dallas.... shitty places.
Then there's the poor unincoorporated area of Sand Branch that is also SE of Dallas that is struggling - they're not shitty, just shitty circumstances given to them......