this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2026
64 points (92.1% liked)

politics

31196 readers
2226 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Donald Trump on Thursday said he is weighing whether or not to "annihilate" Iran in a renewed effort to end the illegal 201-day US-Israeli war of choice, musings that came on the heels of a report by United Nations experts who said the United States likely committed war crimes during earlier attacks on the Middle East nation.

"I have a big decision coming up. Do I want to go in and annihilate them, or do I not?" Trump told Axios' Barak Ravid. "It's a big decision. Anything could happen with me."

I'm betting he's going to nuke 'em. He already moved nuclear bombers into the Middle East. The ecconomic ramifications of that (initial and long term) ontop of the international backlash from that would signal the true end of the American empire, which might cause guillotines to be rolled out. I'd honestly not know how the US would continue on as a country in that outcome.

It'd probably break down along partisan lines that mirror the Civil War's lines. The South would rage and bring back slavery (they really hated losing them such that this grevience persists into today's politics). Wish I lived in a northern state. Putin would really have gotten a bang for his buck in that situation.

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

The only thing he’ll annihilate is one of the white house bathrooms.

[–] SecretiveVault@lemmy.zip 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What a fucking dumbshit. He'll talk a big game, back down and cower like the dandruff brained dimentia riddled pedophile he is.

[–] ProfThadBach@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

TACO Tuesday

[–] uen3@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago

Preparations being made for the big day

[–] nanometer1625@thelemmy.club 4 points 6 days ago

The Mad King

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Is he aware that China has said any country that uses a nuke will be met with a nuke? Also Putin will nuke Ukraine the day after. Earth could be a nuclear hellscape 48 hours later or less...

[–] nanometer1625@thelemmy.club 4 points 6 days ago

That threat works in game theory, but only with the assumption that all players are rational.

[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

based china. "oh you wanna fuck around? we can all die, that's an option"

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's sort of a lot of precedent.

[–] Smif_N_Lenin@piefed.social 3 points 6 days ago

One might call it MAD

[–] Lydon_Feen@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Let's hope that if it comes to that, the military won't follow his deranged, genocidal orders. That would definitely be the right time for a coup.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

People also said that the military would not follow him into committing war crimes but here we are.

[–] Lydon_Feen@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

I know it's wishful thinking but a nuke is not on the same level as blowing up boats.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Kegsbreath has been priming the military for such occasions.

[–] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Yup. Double tapping the boats inthec Caribbean was a test run on committing atrocities

[–] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago

Our country is run by a dementia ridden terrorist

"anything could happen with me"

sounds like a good argument for the 25th.

[–] Aphos@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Can he do that? A nuclear strike would need others to go with the plan or not?

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

To initiate a launch of weapons of mass destruction, it requires the approval of the National Command Authority (NCA). That’s an impressive sounding name, but the NCA consists of only two people: The President and his political appointee, the Secretary of Defense.

-Explained here.

It comes out of the War Powers Resolution of 1973. Essentially, Congress delegated its war powers to the president and his loyalist. So, basically, it'd boil down to tRump and Pete Kegsbreath agreeing to nuke Iran. Maybe some in the military would not carry out the order, but how unlikely would it be that they couldn't find ONE MAGAt to carry out their orders?

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Jeez, I'm sure glad those Americans have all of those checks and balances in place...

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

Well we're safe, there is no secretary of defense, only war.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I can just imagine the two shake hands afterwards congratulating each other on the decision.

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think in the past there would have been a tacit expectation that one consults with allies at least for some logistics, but currently there is no such expectation I assume, and there is certainly no such requirement. What a catastrophe it would be. One from which humanity may never recover.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

What a catastrophe it would be. One from which humanity may never recover.

He can't even wipe his own ass. Shit comes out of both ends on this dumbass

[–] datendefekt@feddit.org 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Trump has threatened the end of Iranian civilization several times now. It’s what he does. He’s a bully and he threatens. And then he pedals back.

The only motivation I can think of is that the religious nutjobs want to bring about the end times. But what if Iran’s glass, life continues and nobody’s raptured? They only have this one chance and I could imagine it scaring them shitless.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

There are some of these sects that have been predicting the End Times for hundred of years now. They're always wrong but they just say they must have gotten it wrong and just "calculate" another date and keep going. These are not rational people, the failure of their prediction is not going to snap them out of it or anything like that.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Crazy end-times dumbasses can always retcon their bullshit after the fact. There is centuries of examples of them doing it.

But: I seriously doubt things would not escalate into extinction-level warfare if dumbass were to actually be crazy enough to nuke Iran.

[–] bunnybunny@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

lol no it won’t. I’ll tell what will happen. The Republicans will praise Trump for the tough decision he made. The MAGA folk will party in the street. One third of Americans, who didn’t vote at all, will keep watching tv or doomscrolling Insta or TikTok. Sure some people will take to the streets, they will be beat down by ICE.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If he nukes Iran, it's probably game over for everyone.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yep. Nuclear escalation will kill us all. Russia would use theirs on Ukraine, maybe on Europe too. Europe would retaliate, China may use theirs on Taiwan or just use them as retaliation on the US. It would be a total shit show. Just because Americans elected a senile pedophile as President.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

It's like the beginning of world War 1 one guy was assassinated and all the dominoes fell, everyone started attacking eachother

[–] bunnybunny@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 days ago

Well then let’s hope there are some Americans left with a spine and some fucking integrity. Cause looking from the outside in it doesn’t look like there are a lot of those left

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

This is just so fucking insane. Low-t needs to be locked up.

"The missiles are flying. Hallelujah, hallelujah."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tj9M34DzAKo