this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
-24 points (31.8% liked)

News

38197 readers
1798 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We did?! Where?

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago (2 children)

In other words: During the pandemic, those under 40, many flush with stimulus checks, took to the stock market and saw big gains.

Who the fuck wrote this? "Flush with stimulus checks"?? You mean those one-time payouts that didn't even cover a month's rent while half of us were out of work?

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

It basically boils down to people getting a couple extra paychecks.

MASSIVE GAINS! SO WEALTH!

[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 0 points 2 years ago

The much more obvious interpretation is that a lot of them inherited cash from the untimely deaths of their parents.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Guys, this is all based on percentages. If you started out with $5 in your name, and got a $1200 stimmie, then poof! You're now 24,000% richer. (At least until the rent is due....)

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Nah.

The big part was student loan pauses.

With rent skyrocketing, many in that age group also had to move back home. Not paying for rent means a lot more money in your bank account. Just not enough income to rent your own place.

There's lots of very interesting factors to consider...

But the author is apparently just an idiot if they're saying it's because of investments in the stock market

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

Lmfao, I'm actually offended on how bad this propaganda is. Try better, OP.

[–] Paragone@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

This looks like a perfect example of disinformation/propaganda, and it is remarkably-effective, at producing churn/buzz/kerfuffle, isn't it?

If everybody just instantly saw that it contradicts the statistics of homelessness, of people-residing-at-their-parents'-place, at the working-destitution-wages, at the 50% of renters can't sustain the rent they're paying, etc...

then it wouldn't have the traction it obviously-does..

Remarkable example of machiavellianism, this...

I'd love to see what torqued "data" they use as their basis,

and maybe that is based on torque, too..

Too bad journalism's "left the building"..

_ /\ _

[–] Icalasari@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

The fuck kind of statistics twisting propoganda bullshit...?

[–] papertowels@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just as a data point, I did buy a single share of Tesla at $420 for the memes back in covid days, and sold it recently for a manyfold profit, so there's that.

Overall though, due to inflation, I doubt we're better off.

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The all-time high Tesla stock closing price was 409.97 on November 04, 2021.

?

[–] papertowels@lemmy.one 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

You didn't share your actual source so I can't verify, but it sounds like it didn't take into account stock splits.

1 share at the start of covid at $420 became 15 shares, each currently worth a little less than $200 for a sum total of a little less than $3000 from that $420 purchase.

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Just a quick Google auto-answer. I figured there might be some funny business like that, thanks.

[–] bedrooms@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

During the pandemic, those under 40, many flush with stimulus checks, took to the stock market and saw big gains.

Yoh... u alllll did dis!? I envy u!!!

I'm a fellow human being living outside America

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Those under 40 with stimulus checks saw the check disappear the next time they had to pay rent....

[–] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Trilly? Not certain I like how this article wrote things. Regardless the article seems to imply there was a slight advantage for the younger generations that the older fifnt get to capitalize on. Wonder how thst contrasts to, what I understand to be, nearly constant stacking financial advantages the older generations get.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Agreed. Just on a basic level of writing, this article is really bad , especially for an organization like Axios. The title is downright insulting to imply that younger generations are in any way better off now than they were pre-COVID.