this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
77 points (88.9% liked)

News

36457 readers
2675 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The U.S. government should block the import of low-cost Chinese autos and parts from Mexico, a U.S. manufacturing advocacy group said on Friday, warning they could threaten the viability of American car companies.

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 46 points 2 years ago

So, it's vital that we allow US car manufacturers to continue selling us exorbitantly priced cars, loaded with software subscriptions and spyware, unchecked? OK, got it, we're on it y'all!

[–] ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world 40 points 2 years ago

Until they stop charging $100,000 for a 1 ton truck or $30,000 for an entry level car they can fuck right off.

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 39 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Just give me a little corolla with crank windows and a EV motor. I don't need some sort of futuristic spacecraft. Give it the exact same model as the cheapest gas vehicle, just give me electric, that's all I want and it seems like they are too stupid to figure it out.

[–] Addv4@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They're not, its just that decent electric drive trains are kinda expensive. Old 4 cylinder engines with simple transmissions are actually pretty cheap to manufacture in comparison. There are some that work fine (Mini Cooper Se for example), but they usually have a fairly short range of under 100 miles.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Yeah, the closest example might be the Chevy Bolt (which seems to get very positive reviews).

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

They were not getting high enough margins on the Bolt so they planned to kill it off in favor of the Silverado and GMC Sierra EVs. They got a lot of shit for it since that is by far their best selling EV so they backpedaled and said they were only taking a year off and it will be back on the Optium platform. Unfortunately that likely means they will be using GM's garbage infotainment system that has led to tons of their EVs being recalled.

[–] NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Just don't get one from 2017-2019. They've been recalled at least twice for going up in flames. As of now you're just not supposed to charge them overnight or park them inside of a structure.

https://jalopnik.com/nhtsa-issues-chevy-bolt-spontaneous-combustion-warning-1847295205

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I sometimes wonder what happened to that car.

[–] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

BYD is selling a low end EV in China for $12k. They have nice cars in the $30k range. They have built out a supply chain that makes this possible (cheaper labor, too).

[–] invertedspear@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Kona, ID4, I think the BMW is the i3, mini se, I can’t remember the name of the Fiat, Bolt.

They are there, Tesla just made everyone think they needed 300+ miles of range. If you can get by with 50-75 miles of around range, and most people can, you can grab one of these used for a good price. The problem is they didn’t sell well, so they had very short runs.

[–] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Which could also lead to parts supply issues.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 2 years ago (1 children)

US automakers are afraid that BYD is going to prove that a LOT of Americans don't actually want McMansions on wheels.

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago

Moreso that Americans cant afford American cars anymore

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you only support the free market when it works for you, you don't support free markets, you're just a bad weather socialist.

[–] player2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

"We need to convert all cars to electric ASAP to save the planet!"
"-Wait, not like that!"

Seriously though, when I visited China recently, I was blown away by how many cool cars are there. In the US we have like 3 companies that own the entire market of similar vehicles.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 years ago

Once business stop competing they also stop innovating.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 18 points 2 years ago

Tip: stop only producing big ass models that have high margins. It's like the only thing they learned from the great recession was that they would be bailed out by the government. People do not want to spend $50k on a car.

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I’ll support this only if the us automakers promise not to export their oversized and poorly built emotional support vehicles. Because the US automakers by their own admission would only be able to survive because of US government support and, I don’t want to have wanky yank tank’s converting more children to homogeneous paste in my country.

[–] gitgud@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago (3 children)

USA: Big fan of free markets until communists enter the ring.

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

"Communists"

[–] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Chinas economy is closer to a single party than communist. Their economy, while heavily steered by that single party and the government shares in ownership of production (socialism), is likely more capitalist than the US. If you can make it faster or cheaper then go for it. They don’t enforce IP rights that hand monopolies to big companies. There are not laws that lock in outdated business models via cronyism.

[–] Nudding@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

In the US, corporations control the government. In China, the government controls corporations.

[–] Nudding@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago

Where are the communists?

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

why is it my fault that you suck at making cars bitch

[–] Hello_there@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They need competition. But the imported cars are being heavily subsidized by China to build the market.

Maybe let the tiny cars in? Because there's minimal competition there at the moment and people would buy the heck out of a cheap small car. Maybe will push market in right direction

[–] projectsquared@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Did the US automakers nuke all of their small, inexpensive offerings due to lack of demand or their inability to sell those vehicles for prices they deemed ‘acceptable’?

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 2 points 2 years ago

But not the US parts and cars made in Mexico, those are cool.

[–] Smeagol666@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

They're all "LeT tHe MaRkEt DeCiDe" when they're part of the cartel that keeps prices high, then cry like babies when actually asked to compete.