this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
669 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

59219 readers
3230 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Tesla's value plunged nearly $200 billion since mid-July – and the EV maker faces a bumpy road ahead::Tesla shares closed Tuesday at just over $233, well down on their 2023 peak of $291.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hudson@sh.itjust.works 116 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (16 children)

maybe they should focus on making a decent product instead of manufacturing bs

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 65 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Well Musk is spending most of his time breaking Xitter lately so maybe the Tesla guys can get some good stuff done while he's distracted.

[–] stevehobbes@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Probably not. Tesla is very dysfunctional as an org. He flattened it so much, and hasn’t appointed a real leader, while he’s distracted I bet they’re basically in a holding pattern.

He motivated them by setting insane goals then driving them insanely hard and sleeping in the office and shit.

If he’s not doing that, the company is, pardon the pun, on autopilot. Watch out for stopped emergency vehicles.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Changetheview@lemmy.world 89 points 1 year ago (21 children)

Setting aside anything related to Musk, Tesla really doesn’t seem to be staying competitive.

Cybertruck (and the “indestructible” window press conference) is probably the easiest example. Years of attempted hype that haven’t paid off in a meaningful manner, while rivals have been releasing in-class competition. Anyone can see that’s a problem.

Tesla cars used to be pretty revolutionary, now they’re in an entirely different era that’s filling with exciting EV alternatives around every corner. Yet Tesla style still looks the same. The shoddy construction is still around and becoming more widespread knowledge. They’re failing to attract their target audience due to a long series of missteps. More problems.

Not to mention that Tesla was downright overpriced at its height. It’s a fraction of the volume yet made other automaker valuations look minuscule. The logic for that was never there.

[–] ScoobyDoo27@lemm.ee 54 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Besides Musk…it’s the fact they are still using the same design from 10+ years ago. When I see a tesla, I can’t tell the difference between the S & 3 or the X & Y. They made one car and scaled it in their software. All 4 cars are due for a redesign and they don’t need to all look identical. And they need to figure out how to actually assemble them without being shit.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cybertruck is a symptom of poor leadership. Maybe after it flops, Tesla will clean house.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

While I agree Cybertruck may have jumped the shark, I recently noticed …. After years of GM saying cylindrical batteries are not practical and pouch batteries are the only way to go, and Ultium is more advanced than anything Tesla has …. They’re redesigning EV models early to switch to cylindrical batteries like Tesla

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] evatronic@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Give it 5 - 10 years. Tesla will be a company that makes and maintains a charging station network and sells batteries to the other auto makers.

It's becoming increasingly obvious that they can't hack it in an automotive sales industry. Which is fine, frankly. I think battery manufacturing and charging network are pretty complimentary industries and provide a decent revenue stream into the future, License the charging tech to other automakers early and get some vendor lock-in going, and the company could be in it for the long haul.

They might even be able to keep making a couple EVs, to prove new charging or battery tech, much like how Google keeps making Pixel phones to essentially prove and market new Android features.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] DingoBilly@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Such a remarkably overvalued company. I'd be surprised if it's still around in a few decades. Feels like they're the MySpace of today - they're big and have first mover advantage but have nothing interesting down the line and newer companies will and are supplanting it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] silvercove@lemdro.id 52 points 1 year ago (29 children)

Good, the MAGA car company should lose value.

[–] mrgreyeyes@feddit.nl 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The market is finally correcting itself.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
[–] uglyduckling81@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It was never worth the stupid value it was pumped up to. Why do you think Elon has been dumping so much of it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zabadoh@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 year ago (6 children)

The moment those Chinese EV startups enter the US market, Tesla will be in real trouble if they don't have their product quality image problem fixed by then.

It'll be like Detroit's Big 3 automakers tanking when small fuel efficient Japanese cars landed in the 70s oil crisis.

Assuming those Chinese EV companies don't have their own quality problems...

[–] Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Chinese EVs absolutely have quality problems, but they are half the price. Tesla's are sold at luxury prices with third rate QA.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Chinese quality has gone up in the last 20 or so years since they transitioned from poor to industrial country. You can't cling to the cheap knockoffs you buy on Aliexpress either.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Cheez@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

There's already so many BYDs in Australia.

At $20,000 cheaper, it sure makes a lot of people not care about whatever bells and whistles the Tesla has.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Tesla is already in trouble.

Hyundai Ioniq 5/6, Kia Ev6.

VW ID line.

Ford F150 Lightning.

Those are the things that will absolutely decimate Tesla's market share. Known brands that can actually put together cars without basic issues like Panel gaps and paint issues.

Ones that reject the absolutely dangerous and moronic UX of putting everything onto a big screen instead of having physical buttons.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Elon Musk financed about $20bn into the Twitter purchase by selling Tesla stock.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

despite the 200b drop in tesla, those 20bn probably still would be worth more than the Twitter stocks he owns now.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Twitter is a money pit circling the drain.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PatFussy@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I dont get how this is news. Teslas market cap was already higher than all the other car makers combined while only producing a fraction of the vehicles. Everyone knew that this stock wasnt a value stock. Where is the news

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] skymtf@pricefield.org 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm surprised this isn't just because of there being more competitors to Tesla like rivian. Tbh though I dislike cars, I just have to use them sadly.

[–] DietBajaBlast@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I love cars, and I know that goes against what I’m supposed to say here.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

It's okay to love cars, people have an issue with the Car being the only viable option in many places.

When I lived in Brno, which is at around 450K population in Czechia, I was going there by car, as in I drove from Slovakia to Brno, parked my car and haven't used it until I was visiting Slovakia again, I only used it when I went for a big shopping to the hypermarket that was at the outskirts of the city.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

There aren't any. By volume Tesla is still the biggest EV maker by far. The competition is nowhere close to catching up. If they screw up the launch of the Cybertruck, they'll really be in trouble, though. Also, the valuation is to a large degree based on the promise of full self driving. That seems to be an increasingly distant prospect, though.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (9 children)

But Telsa’s market share has dropped from 79% to 62.4% in 2 years.

Things are changing fast.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah, but the silly Tech Startup kind of market valuation with the associated crazy P/Es (justified by "we will take over the whole industry" kind of justification) that made them more valueable than all US automakers combined (not just the EV auto-segment, everything) is dissapearing.

Their valuation reflecting the size of their market share (in the entire auto-market, not just EVs which are still a minority of sales) and growth direction (growing mainly due to the EV segment growing and don't seem to be in line to dominate the whole auto-market as EVs take over) means a massive fall from the fantasy "we'll take over the world" valuations.

Mind you, it's happenning more generally in the whole Tech segment as the end of free money which was used in leveraged stock investment is wiping out all the investment strategies based on wild and fantastical claims of "future prospects" and on finding greater suckers.

It's probably not even a fall due any worst numbers or concrete prospects for Tesla: the collapse of the massive stock price premiums (judging by the P/Es in Tech vs those in the wider market) for "future prospects" in the whole of the Tech industry, would definitelly pull Tesla's stock price down hard because Elon's main business "strategy" has always been to frame his ventures as Edgy Tech in order to reap such premiums and he definitelly went hard on it with Tesla.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] steltek@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hasn't the F-150 has already preemptively destroyed the Cybertruck? I suppose most people driving pickups don't actually need a pickup's functionality. They're just told they need a pickup so that's what they buy.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I see more F150 Lightning trucks than I do model 3 cars, and this is in a red state full of people who are scared of electric vehicles.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rauls4@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe anecdotal but I bought a Kia EV6 over a Tesla because of Musk and CarPlay support. I know I can’t be the only one that took that into consideration.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anewbeginning@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They went to the stock chart, picked the latest peak, and wrote the article of doom. It's down 20% a year ago, but up 20% for the last 6 months, and up 119% YTD.

Not that Tesla doesn't have its ills or seems to be stagnating, but picking points in a chart is a feeble argument.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

Maybe the investors should all vote on kicking Elon out of the company.

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 10 points 1 year ago (11 children)

I see so much hate toward Tesla in this post and I assume it's mostly because of Musk.

But at the end of the day they are still the ones selling the most EV which I still believe is a good thing.

I'd rather people buy an asshole's EV than another polluting pick-up truck tbh. (I know EV are also creating pollution, no need to point this out ty).

The vast majority of EVs I see in the street of my french city are Tesla's. And I see a bit more everyday. And no matter how much I despise Musk, I still appreciate the fact that tesla is helping us move forward from combustion engines.

I don't really care if someone buys a Tesla just to show off. It's one less combustion engine on the road.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

But at the end of the day they are still the ones selling the most EV which I still believe is a good thing.

"Over 10 Percent of Tesla Model S EVs Fail Germany’s Strict Inspection After 3 Years. It’s actual hard data on Tesla’s quality issues as seen in the wild." https://www.thedrive.com/news/44068/over-10-percent-of-tesla-model-s-evs-fail-germanys-strict-inspection-after-3-years

Tesla deserves credit for opening the door on EVs, but these days something like a Hyundai Ionic / Kia EV just makes more sense when you don't want to buy expensive trash.

load more comments (9 replies)

Who would have thought your brand would tank if you go full send on being a absolute douche bag. Almost like there is consequences for you actions... Something these ultra rich assholes never face.

load more comments
view more: next ›