this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
60 points (96.9% liked)

News

23361 readers
3353 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Since Texas banned virtually all abortions, Texans may have seen a rosy message about adoption pop up on their phone screens or dot the view on their daily commute. It might read something like this:  

Adoption helps “empower” women and allows them to be "in control” of their future. 

That message or sentiment appears on billboards and digital advertisements that direct people to ModernAdoptionPlans.org** **— the product of a targeted, state-funded marketing campaign aiming to increase adoptions among young women and girls with unplanned pregnancies, according to documents obtained through an open records request. In the documents, organizers explicitly laid out a target audience with "the highest incidence of unplanned pregnancies": low-income, single women that "skew African-American and Hispanic" between the ages of 12 and 34.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 8 months ago

Longer article than I care to spend time reading. Texas still sucks, though. I'm quite certain that's the crux of it.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 7 points 8 months ago

The language that permeates the Modern Adoption website, describing mothers who relinquish their child as “brave” and “loving,” reflects how marketing tactics have changed around adoption over the last several decades, from a shame-based approach to one that makes women feel like they’re making the right choice, experts say.

But women primarily turn to adoption when they lack social support and feel they have no other choice, said Gretchen Sisson, a sociologist at the University of California, San Francisco, who studies adoption and abortion. 

“It’s a constrained choice; it isn’t an empowered choice,” she said. “If you gave people the resources they need to parent their children, they’d be parenting their children.”

I feel like there are different parties having two totally different debates happening here.

  1. Abort or put up for adoption.

  2. Put up for adoption or get aid to raise oneself.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

In the documents, organizers explicitly laid out a target audience with “the highest incidence of unplanned pregnancies”: low-income, single women that “skew African-American and Hispanic” between the ages of 12 and 34.

Adoptions are expensive. As the article says, between $25,000 and $50,000. That means the majority of potential adoptees of color would necessarily be priced out. So are there really enough white couples willing to adopt minority kids for this to make any sense?

I assume, since this is Texas, these also have to be CisHet couples, making the pool even smaller.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Can’t read the article since it wants me to disable my adblocker, and that ain’t happening.

But, if the campaign is skewing African American women… then why does the billboard for this article depict a white woman?

[–] Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Can’t read the article since it wants me to disable my adblocker, and that ain’t happening.

Click on reader view and that message will go away. That’s what I did.