Good.
Judges should not be the first line against mental illness.
this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
156 points (99.4% liked)
News
23296 readers
3345 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Judges should not be the first line against mental illness.
That would actually be an improvement over the current situation where the first line is just a jail cell with an indefinite stay
About 400 people deemed mentally incompetent to stand trial are sitting in Colorado jail cells this week waiting for a bed in a state mental health hospital, some of them for longer than a year and many for misdemeanor offenses.
It’s a “human rights crisis” and an endless, expensive cycle that state lawmakers are trying to stop. Legislation that passed its first hearing 11-0 on Tuesday at the state Capitol would divert people accused of low-level crimes into mental health treatment instead of requiring them to be “restored to competency,” a process for which the waitlist is months long.
Eventually, it definitely would be nice if these people didn't have to be run through the criminal justice system at all to get the treatment they need, but this is what generations of lawmakers who only ever wanted to do domestic spending for cops has left us with
Judges should be involved, but involved in civil psych holds, not criminal charges. A judge being involved means the person being held has an opportunity to tell that judge why they don't require psych treatment, and the doc holding them must explain their rationale in court filings. The courts definitely need to remain involved in that system, otherwise people's due process would be violated.
Yes.
However a judge should not be the first line.
No, but these are people who were arrested for various criminal charges and who were already found not competent to stand trial. Either way, I'd bet an overwhelming majority of them would require involuntary treatment, even if they had no criminal charges. Point being, a judge isn't the front line of mental health response, but it will be for individuals who need treatment but are refusing.
That’s what we said in the 80’s when Reagan first fucked it up horribly.
Goddamn that was forty years ago
lack of universal healthcare.
they pushed all the mentally ill into the streets back in the 70s/80s so they could save a buck on healthcare. then ramped up spending on cops and jails so they could move this population into something more profitable.
your politicians did this to you on purpose.
That would be the compassionate thing. This is America. We don't do the compassionate thing.
To the downvoter: make your case for USA’s compassion. You can’t, coward.
I'm guessing it's the opposite. I'm guessing they think those people deserve their treatment and compassion is bad. Probably an Ayn Rand fan.
400 is honestly not many, I'm confident Colorado can figure this out. I live in Texas, where this number is in the thousands and our government doesn't care even a little about it
400 feels laughably low.