this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
241 points (97.6% liked)

News

23296 readers
5038 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A second Trump White House would seek to sharply reduce the power of U.S. financial regulators, according to a review of public documents and interviews with people allied with the former president.

In the wake of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, Congress dramatically expanded the U.S. government's oversight of the financial industry to prevent a repeat of the 2008 global banking meltdown.

Donald Trump would likely renew his efforts to scale back those reforms, if elected, as well as pare protections for small-scale investors and borrowers, and allow companies to raise money with less scrutiny, according to the interviews and proposals from groups positioned to influence a new conservative administration. Reuters spoke with, among others, about a dozen people who have provided advice or been consulted by Trump or his allies.

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 87 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, nothing bad happened when the banks got deregulated. I don't see anything going wrong this time either.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 26 points 7 months ago

Yeah, it isn't like banks were doing all kinds of terrible stuff that lead to the regulations or anything.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 77 points 7 months ago (3 children)
  • Banks do completely irresponsible things that lead to economic meltdown.
  • New regulations are introduced to prevent that from happening again.
  • Banks buy politicians that scrap regulations in the name of the "free market".
  • Banks cause economic meltdown again.
  • Rinse and repeat.
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 7 months ago

You forgot the government bailout after step 1.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

They lose billions of dollars of other people's money over night. Mostly working class people who can't afford to lose it.

Banks get bailed out by the government, keep the money and pass the costs on to the consumer.

Working class people pay for the loss, pay the taxes to cover the loss, and never see a dime returned.

Working class people are chastised for wanting hand outs as they struggle to afford basic necessities, even in 6 figure incomes.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

You can replace banks with "companies", and you can replace economic meltdown with "disasters" and it applies to everything.

The Reagan era and conservative think tanks have created a political plan to ensure this cycle and that corporations always surface, even if it means stepping on the lives of millions of Americans.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 41 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

To people that think capitalism under Biden and capitalism under Trump are the same, it's not. It's a choice between regulated capitalism and free for all capitalism.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't describe capitalism under Biden as regulated but it's certainly more regulated than MAGA capitalism. 😂

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 7 months ago

Yeah my partner got a cold-call from a scammy company with nothing but terrible reviews and people being scammed out of their SSI/SSDI by this company.

The company is literally endorsed by and partnered with the Social Security Administration and literally all the reviews are about how they lie to you and say you can keep your benefits and then suddenly your benefits are cut.

God if this is "regulated" capitalism then I am fucking Mickey Mouse.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

A partially regulated capitalism that works for the ultra wealthy, and a less partially regulated capitalism that works really hard for the ultra wealthy seem like two rungs on the same ladder, and we're all at the bottom.

I'm not saying red and blue are identical, they're not. But from down here the difference between them where they meet isn't all that clear and everything looks like shades of purple.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

How do you move the Overton window? By making sure that they can't lose to the free for all, no regulation GOP. Then Dems can do more. (Besides that I don't share your view, you're pretty much a disguised 'both side same' BS.)

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

By becoming the unhinged leftist they're saying you are.

Decades of settling for the lesser of two evils put us exactly where we are. Continuing to do the same isn't going to magically move it back.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Sigh. Because Republicans still win. You can't move policy left when Republicans still win. And/or have a chance of winning. This is easy. So how do you make sure they don't win? By voting. JFC this is easy.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

"vote for the guy you don't like, otherwise the guy I don't like will win."

Y'all absolutely refuse to adopt policies that are more attractive to left leaning people and have the fucking audacity to tell me I need to vote for your guy?

Demand progressive action, loudly. Then we can talk.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Demand and then vote. JFC. Move the Overton window. Otherwise you're just an angry old man yelling at a cloud. Ciao.

*Forgot to say you really did expose yourself as "both sides" bs too.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 40 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because making the wealthy more money is exactly what our economy needs!

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] astanix@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well, if the swamp you're referring to is poor people... that's exactly what's happening.

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That was the joke, yes. Though I guess it was unclear lol

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 21 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The "I got rich by cheating, so I'm gonna make it easier for everyone to cheat" approach...

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Well, not everyone. Only other worthy people. You know, white, rich, male, etc.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

More like the "I owe the wrong people debts and have to pay them somehow" strategy.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

His eastern European oligarch bros are tired of all the trouble when all they want to do is launder a little money.

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Time for another society ending financial crash I guess.

[–] muse@fedia.io 2 points 7 months ago

Wheat futures and coca cola stocks it is!

[–] Blackout@kbin.run 15 points 7 months ago

And free the people from breathable air, drinkable water, job protections and more!

[–] Cheems@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

If Trump wins he'll attempt to implement things that will scar this country worse than Reagan

[–] Binthinkin@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago

Unregulated capitalism is a major problem so Trump probably won’t win.