Hamartiogonic

joined 2 years ago
[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Imagine how hard it would be to buy stuff or use free services if you actually had to read and understand the contracts every time.

Ok, I’ll just quickly check on Google maps what’s south of Mongolia. Oh, I need to read all that before seeing the map? Well, maybe later. Don’t really have the time for that right now.

If that’s what life was like, laziness would win nearly every time and companies would have hardly any users or customers. Eventually some companies would probably make super short contracts in order to lower the threshold.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Can confirm. This is the way.

I keep on taking that lesson from time to time, but I still haven’t passed the final exam.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 months ago

Finding the right materials has been really hard, but the next obstacle is scaling up the production. As long as we’re talking about small scale production, these batteries are going to be really expensive and only suitable for very few products.

VW is suggesting that they have solved both of these problems, which obviously makes me a bit skeptical. However, I don’t think it’s impossible, but I’m saying it’s really hard. I would have expected to see some luxury products use SSBs first before seeing them in main stream brands.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Typo. Was supposed to swipe “storage expenses”.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Given that we’re talking about batteries… Remember what phone and laptop manufacturers say about their batteries?

On top of that, these are solid state batteries, not your usual Li-ion batteries with a liquid electrolyte. This is the first time I’ve heard of a large well known company announce they’re using solid state batteries.

That technology has been under development for decades, and it has been applied in some very special devices before, but maybe now it’s finally the time to start large scale production.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

And with this brilliant move they are going to increase bandwidth and storage expenses. There’s a reason why it’s so hard to compete with YouTube.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 months ago

Totally remember the lack of apps. Initially, I just had to use Lemmy through a mobile browser. Lots of devs were working hard to publish their apps, and after a few months we had lots of options. That was just amazing how quickly it happened.

BTW shout out to Bean, my favorite Lemmy client. It’s not perfect, so in some cases I still use Voyager to fill in the gaps, so bonus points for Voyager too.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 months ago

Normally, words hang out in larger groups called sentences or clauses. Words are social, so they like to stick together and form social bonds and hierarchies.

However, some words don’t have anyone to hang out with, and they’re called lone words.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 months ago

Who needs a two-party system, when all you need is one. It’s working pretty well in China, Cuba and North Korea.

/s just in case…

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 months ago

Yes, that’s the fascinating thing. Using labeling as a mental shortcut for understanding the world is really useful, but it comes with a price tag.

It’s basically the same problem we have when labeling thins as “religion” or “some other stuff”. We might want to call something a religion, but it doesn’t quite match. We might want to label something else a non-religion, but it meets all the criteria. Those labels aren’t neutral either, so using them comes with some baggage.

Same thing with FOSS. If we label it a socialist concept, that label comes with some unfortunate connotations… Well, at least if you’re in a country where socialism is frowned upon.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 months ago

Care to elaborate that bit about capitalism?

As a non-American, I’ve been struggling to understand how Americans use these terms. Sure, I’ve seen plenty of “capitalism good, socialism bad” rhetoric, but what do people actually mean when they use them? Your example was particularly interesting, because it sounds like you’re implying that Trump promised capitalism, but failed to deliver.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Just because an idea is labeled as socialist/capitalist or whatever, doesn’t inherently make it good or bad. People like to label things to simplify complicated topics, but that shortcut isn’t always worth it. Nowadays, I hear a lot of talk about this or that being socialist/communist thing as if that makes it automatically bad. Somehow, I get the feeling that most of those people are Americans. If that’s actually true, it would make a lot of sense.

view more: ‹ prev next ›