Those donations alone totaled over $20,000.
It always amazes me how cheaply these traitors sell us out.
this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
637 points (99.4% liked)
News
37556 readers
2101 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
That's only the public money. Who knows how much dark money they got for it.
Reminds me of when Sam Bankman Freid (FTX Crypto guy) said he was surprised it only cost him lile $50k to buy off a politician or something. And the Oceangate CEO apparently said that if someone complains about the safety of his sub he'll just "buy a senator".
I can't remember where I was reading this but being cheap to purchase is by design.
If politicians were expensive to buy, the public outcry would be significantly higher and would also incur more scrutiny. So there is this balance of bribing a politician vs their voters being upset that their politician taking too much money. Oddly there doesn't seem to be a floor of "our politician can be bought too cheaply."
The other side of this is that until Citizens United is overturned, there is no limit to how much a company can spend on special interest groups. This is where politicians fear the most. If they don't go along with whatever issue, then they have to raise more money to run for re-election, which puts more pressure on them to accept the bribe in the first place.
TL;DR: money in politics is killing our democracy
load more comments
(1 replies)
And remember, billionaires didn’t get to be billionaires by spending money that they didn’t think would result in more money coming back to them.
"Fossil fuels come from the Earth, so they're green"
Every fucking day since 2016 it get's harder and harder to come up with any remotely believable satire. There's just no way of joking about reality, because that would require actually subverting expectations or exceeding norms to absurd levels, and that's actually happening constantly in real life, making it not-fun
Don't worry, the Supreme Court just gave the okay for slashing 1400 education department jobs and reducing funding.
In no time at all, our population will be so dumb that it won't matter what words we use to describe anything!
Came across this theory recently. Seems to provide insight to today.
http://www.onthewing.org/user/Bonhoeffer%20-%20Theory%20of%20Stupidity.pdf
I've been reading Bonhoeffer recently. His work is very much relevant right now, and quite depressing.
by their logic, cyanide is also green and harmless since it comes from plants and is renewable.
load more comments
(8 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
All this for donations equivalent to the price of a used Toyota Camry? What a cheap suit Landry is.
Is it a bad thing that I read this as “cheap slut”?
I had to deal with this shit in my environmental studies class in uni. Apparently the forestry industry has been promoting their own brand of propaganda that says burning wood, the most greenhouse-gas-producing fuel on the planet, is environmentally friendly because it is "renewable".
Great, we'll all be dead from global warming but at least in theory the trees that burned down from the wildfires could have reabsorbed that carbon over a couple centuries.
Yeah, we do it in the UK too. "Biomass" is just impatient coal.
Burning wood is green iff the wood was harvested from trees planted for this purpose and all equipment used in the process from planting to harvesting to processing is entirely running on renewable energy.
Seems like it'd be easier to just use solar power and heat pumps for heating
I feel like the bigger issue is all the CO2 emitted from burning literal carbon. Using fossil fuels is just burning trees with extra steps (millennia of burial and compression).
The difference is that the carbon in the wood is in the short carbon cycle while the fossil fuels were sequestered. Carbon wise it doesn't matter if the tree burns or rots (ok rotting does keep some of it in life and soil, but burning leaves some as char).
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(6 replies)
So, if the fed government can sue CA, claiming that states cannot impose additional requirements on egg production because of a federal-level definition + the supremacy clause, how can these states reclassify gas as 'green energy', since the grids are inter-state electrically connected, and the Fed has to set the standard for inter-state commerce?
Or perhaps I'm just reaching to far expecting some kind of consistent application of the law. shrugs
There is no law, only Trump's will and wealthy interests
consistent application of the law
In the Un-United States of Trashcanistan? Lol.
All they know how to do is lie and be violent
You just described fascists.
Corruption this raw unfiltered and cheap makes you wonder how much time needs to get wasted until we outlaw buying politicians again.
load more comments
(1 replies)
There is a whole group of people that really believe that the concept 'perception is reality' is a permission to make up the truth. In other words they believe if they tell a lie enough that it will become reality.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Alright, I gotta hand it to them; this is by far one of, if not THE DUMBEST THING I've ever fucking read. It takes SKILL, DEDICATION, AND HARD WORK to be THIS fucking stupid. I'm genuinely impressed at how hard they've worked to divorce themselves from reality, it's truly a marvel of cognitive restructuring. I'd say there's no way they can top this, but we all know that they'll find one in the next month, and it'll make me question my sanity once again. Congratulations.
But they don't like green energy. Why would they ruin as perfectly good fossil fuel that way?
And then the same people will turn around and look you dead in the eye and say "the left can't even define what a woman is"
Are they at least adding green colouring..?
Only on St Patrick's Day.
It’s got what plants crave
This is what you get when you give conservatives power.
Hopefully America remembers that going forward, but probably not.
Ah yes. Stupidity knows no bounds.
I remember when ohio wasn't like that. I miss the purple state I grew up in
view more: next ›