chiisana

Their grievances with the Lemmy dev team is pretty universal. I can’t wait for Sublinks to become the mature release.

For projects, where they have their community presence also speaks to their ideology. Those projects’ communities chose to move off of Reddit, and be on Lemmy; those projects’ communities chose the instance they’re on.

One may plea ignorance in the early days of Lemmy, that they’re misguided by the instance description; but now a year later after all the drama, their decision to remain there will start to influence who will be able to interact with their community.

I have no sympathy for communities that chose to remain on CSAM infested instances that got defederated, and I will have no sympathy for project communities that continues to associate with ideologies by the ml admins.

I really wish they’d just stay separated cleanly and so we can have three parties going at it instead of a two party us-vs-them setup. The two party us-vs-them in the US really show casing how bad the us-vs-them arrangement can get, and I don’t want that (here in our little BC bubble; I’m aware East Coast “where it matters” it’s a whole different story).

It’s a shame bar washroom stalls didn’t get disrupted by VC money; it remains a pure place where people continue to post whatever they want without a care as to who sees it.

Rather !announcements@lemmy.openmw.org, !general@lemmy.openmw.org, !bugs@lemmy.openmw.org, … etc.

So much more flexibility for organizations to build structured communities!

My understanding is that the “host” instance of the community is responsible in sending things out to the subscribers. As such, when users from B post on a community on C, C will broadcast the activity of user from B to instance A’s federated copy of community on C, and users on A will see the post from the user from B. They should also be able reply to each other’s comments on the community on C.

Intel generally target Xeon products for enterprise servers and workstations. They usually also come with very high price tag to differentiate from retail offering. For most of us, it’s generally drooling over them for 5 years, wait until they’re out of warranty, and buy them from companies offloading servers that are no longer under warranty for a still-hefty-but-more-affordable price.

With a quote like that, the firefighters must be Gen Z or later and have never seen Arachnophobia…

We have a chaotic schedule, without boring everyone with the details, we often end up running the big appliances like laundry washer/dryer, and dishes with the dish washer during wee hours.

The estimator shows we’d save 15 bucks out of 1150 per year if we switch. I don’t think we’ll be switching because at less than $2/mn, I’d rather have the flexibility of never having to think about when I’m turning things on/off.

Unless you’ve got something that draws a lot of power (ie an EV), and you can schedule it to take advantage the discounted hours, it’s unlikely to be beneficial even if people change their entire routine around.

Yeah… you’re the one asking questions. I’ve not asked any.

Good luck with your life.

I’m not taking sides. I’m saying I don’t hear the similarities and there’s stats supporting it. That’s all. That’s what I said earlier. No need to take sides.

From the article itself:

The researchers found that Sky was also reminiscent of other Hollywood stars, including Anne Hathaway and Keri Russell. The analysis of Sky often rated Hathaway and Russell as being even more similar to the AI than Johansson.

I’ve watched Her many years back, and I’ve been following a lot of Johansson’s work in the MCU franchise; I don’t hear her in Sky beyond both voices being similarly aged “female” (can’t really assume the gender of the AI model) voices.

If there are statistical analyses that says otherwise, and aligns with at least some anecdotal evidence, then it isn't “very obvious”.

Also, people calling out dissimilarities from their anecdotal observations, along with statistical evidence against your personal view doesn’t equate to siding with the company, or against some popular celebrity; but rather, simply calling out their observations. This is just a discussion as to whether or not the voice is similar, try not to get too personally attached to either parties.