jwt

While entertaining for us, I don't think that'd be a wise reaction. If she wants to win, she probably also needs to sway some people that are lifetime FOX junkies. Such a reaction could have a 'basket of deplorables' effect (being the stone cold truth, but hardly effective)

That would be cool, like those wheelchairs they make for paralyzed dogs. Although I can't imagine what kind of forces it would have to withstand.

It is mentioned in this article.

... would split the party (possibly irreparably)

Especially since it's a near certainty that Trump would just continue his presidential bid (as a write-in independent if need be).

For me, if a company fails to make a clear cut case about why a product of theirs needs AI, I'm gonna assume they just want to misuse AI to cheaply deliver a mediocre product instead of putting in the necessary cost of manhours.

I'd think so too, but (I assume) you and I don't have a small army of lawyers and lobbyists on retainer.

I think the question is not if it's solvable, but 'who pays for it?' and 'who can be held accountable if things go awry?'

Generally speaking you vote for someone. I'm thinking they meant literally a box on the ballot:
☑️ Against trump

I'm so thankful I live in a country where 4 months is (still) believed to be a ridiculously long amount of time to campaign.

Good luck America! Please show the rest of the world you're still capable of making sane choices.

So we just invert the logic now, right?
Make the captcha impossibly hard to get right for humans but doable for bots, and let people in if they fail the test.

Purple

Oh c'mon man how naive can you be? Between Biden fumbling through debates that should've been child's play and constantly forgetting names, and this guy getting martyred for not getting shot in the face, I'm sorry to say but this race won't even be close.

(And that VP pick? People who are going for the main attraction called Trump aren't going to give a rats ass about the VP pick.)