I mostly disagree (especially on the long term), but hope you're right
nicetriangle
joined 1 year ago
At the same time the LLM will be used to replace (at least some of ) the people who created those works in the first place.
This right here is the core of the moral issue when it comes down to it, as far as I'm concerned. These text and image models are already killing jobs and applying downward pressure on salaries. I've seen it happen multiple times now, not just anecdotally from some rando on an internet comment section.
These people losing jobs and getting pay cuts are who created the content these models are siphoning up. People are not going to like how this pans out.
Well put. I hope this reconfigures cities to be more people oriented and forces better zoning.
Not sure when/if that goes into effect but if so that wouldn’t have any weight on the situation in the article right now.
Should be ineligible to own after that AND get a big fucking fine and/or jail time.
People are so god damned stupid
It's still free and they've offered multiple courses of it since it came out and they've been pretty liberal with it. When I was living there I got the 1st and 2nd dose plus 2 courses of boosters all for free.
I would think the majority of deaths are from some combination of poor general health in the population which is also aging, antivax/antimask/conservative bullshit, and workers rights sucking wrt sick time/etc.
Remember folks, your preparation/travel time and budget for commuting to and eating at work is a free subsidy to both your employer and business real estate companies that is coming out of your life/pocket.
There does appear to be some law on the books stipulating the rules around a quorum and such a law is considered valid unless struck down by said court, I suppose.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/1
The Supreme Court of the United States shall consist of a Chief Justice of the United States and eight associate justices, any six of whom shall constitute a quorum.
Same way the court technically is not limited in headcout by the constitution, either. In that case, it's set by congress.
By record share they mean that there has not been a time prior to now in which they've owned a percentage as high as they currently do.
The graph in the article makes that pretty easy to understand.
It should not be possible for the owner of a company to be impossible to suss out by the fucking government. Like how is that a thing?
People with particularly weak immune systems or people on immunosuppressant drugs are advised not to get the MMR vaccine. There's also some other edge case reasons.