Consider some of those people are trying to do that for rational reasons and check the article as an example of such reasons.
oce
I feel there's some marketing conspiracy with the "office" term. It looks like they have been planning to make it disappear because it is uncool for some new marketing genius or it reduces the target markets, I guess. So they first attached a new term, 365, as a transition, and now they dropped the office while keeping the 365 so recent users can still make the link.
The AI bubble was maybe just a convenient excuse to advance the plan.
Plus, since post-covid, return to office is very unpopular, how convenient!
The plot thickens.
Isn't gamete also only one aspect of what constitutes the sex? What do you do of the sexual phenotype for example? See this article about a multimodal modelisation of sex. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.01.26.525769v1.full.pdf
I didn't know Xbox was so low compared to Playstation, no wonder there's rumor Microsoft will drop console making.
It has its ups and downs, but food is a clear up if you are ready to try new things.
Do you mean what are each dish? Apart from the mochi (pounded rice cake) and the slices of roasted potatoes with black sesame at the top right, you can find the typical dishes and their meaning here: https://www.justonecookbook.com/osechi-ryori-japanese-new-year-food/.
New year osechi?
It's really not complicated. You have to boil a sauce made with cooking sake, mirin and soy sauce, then you let the pealed boiled eggs marinate in the sauce in the fridge for 8 hours. Those eggs are a bit overcooked, it's better when the yellow is still humid, about 7 min boiling.
It passes interviews, it signes a contract and then it gets paid for it.


Why do you think this paper is more correct than the other? This paper seems to be locked on a single definition and says everything else is wrong because it does not follow this definition.
Personally, I find it very intellectually unsatisfying because you can have a individual with male gametes but with a female phenotype, and this definition says, this individual's sex is without a doubt 100% male. It seems the main benefit is not questioning a historical definition, which fits well with conservative opinions. There's clear evidence on many other subjects that this can slow down or block science (ex: tobacco, climate).