Searched a bit and surprisingly couldn't find any agency communication about this. I found that they use some gestures though.
When you consider all the refinement through reinforcement learning managed by labelers and domain experts, it is indeed a simulation of the intelligence of those labelers.
Where do you draw the line for intelligence? Why would the capacity to auto complete tokens based on learned probabilities not qualify as intelligence?
This capacity may be part of human intelligence too.
Why do they keep a name referring to a pseudo-science then?
It is as if astrophysicists were using the name Doctor of Astrology and then claiming it is distinct from the astrology pseudoscience. It would be absurd, wouldn't it?
I don't understand why an MD would want any association with the pseudoscience that osteopathy is. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osteopathy
Marketing I guess?
Amazing. That's the most creativity I have seen associated with them.
Kids this age are able to pexress what they want. While he probably didn't at 4, it's possible he agreed or even asked for the last ones he got.
I guess he had more than one pair and he could have been asking for the last ones.
Being proud of your independence and difference is bad advice? What's your world like then, submitting and following others?
Did you try to teach him to be proud of his independence and differences? Maybe you can work with him on nice come backs against the teasing.
cross-posted from: https://jlai.lu/post/19454496
Photography from a bridge with a red metal fence, looking over the Merguro river, lined with white flowering cherry trees on both sides.
Maybe some special physical interface could be built in the helmet, but if space agencies never came up with a solution for this, it probably means it is not needed.