outdated_belated

joined 1 year ago
[–] outdated_belated@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So many don’t understand just how wildly inefficient bureaucratic hierarchies are; what happens isn’t the most profitable thing, it’s the whim of whoever managed to claw their way highest up.

Basically, the decisions are the manifestation of the artificial stupidity of brute force.

[–] outdated_belated@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So it’s basically “some stuff is E2EE, other stuff is not” which, absent knowing which is which, boils down to no E2E at all.

[–] outdated_belated@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Like anything, depends on the threat model. Private from your little sister? Probably. Private from your boss, at least in the next few months prior to them being leaked? Also probably. Private enough?

That's to some extent a question that can only be answered individually, as everyone's threat models differ. I suppose this fact (everyone having differing threat models) is one of the reasons that so many arguments occur over security.

[–] outdated_belated@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Does Signal back up in plaintext in the cloud? (If so that doesn't sound like E2E encryption… unless the 'ends' are uh… also constituted as the cloud itself which is… defeating the purpose).

Where do the pub/ private keys live, exactly, tbh. (Assuming it is asymmetric encryption that they use?)

Edit: ah, misread. I thought you said that you were not joining it due to it storing plain text in the cloud.

[–] outdated_belated@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

False; it says “100% Safe & Secured” right there on that logo. How could that possisbly be a scam?

[–] outdated_belated@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Up next: companies continue 5-day workweeks anyway, because they’re not even rational in their mandates. (See also: forced RTO).

[–] outdated_belated@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Peer-reviewed publication link

It should be illegal for news articles to report on articles without actually posting the publication link

Edit: pertinently, I’m not 100% sure that’s the same publication, as there doesn’t obviously even seem to be a journal with the title Microbiota (their citation)

[–] outdated_belated@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Excellent instance name

Smart Cars and the like are closer to this, but roads and parking spaces aren’t really designed to take advantage of their comparatively smaller size (eg you can’t drive them side by side down the road).

To be fair, Europe is sort of like this given how small their roads are

To be fair, that statement has fairly broad applicability

[–] outdated_belated@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Seriously. Who gives a rat’s ass if Reddit’s DAUs are say 0.01% higher than they would be due to our participation there to post Lemmy links to place, if in the longer term, we draw more users away from them.

view more: next ›