Foot doesn't have enough holes in it yet, apparently
phx
For people that promote one over the other, my answer is always "why not both"?
Areas that are good for nuclear are likely not as good for solar or wind. The latter two are generally more sustainable, but also more temperamental towards environmental conditions for output.
So my thought is, built all three in the locations best suited to whatever, and also build to storage capacity where possible to manage peak/off-peak loads.
There was, but in replacing ME1 I've found that many of the side missions were similarly filler, not to mention the whole scanning thing. ME2 was the best of the series in this regard.
The story is decent enough, but the missions definitely had some "filler". Its biggest issue was that way launch it was a buggy mess
If you have a couple drinks first it's still decent
Yup, and then the PHP vulnerability came out and eclipsed that on the "oh shit" scale
Is this "Conservative" as in the political affiliation though, or "moderate/cautious"? I think one thing is that current "Conservatives" are anything but
LoL. I wonder if they were amused or annoyed by that nickname
I'd imagine that - similar to the oil and infrastructure targets they're also hitting in the last 6mo - it has taken awhile to get the technology and personnel into locations where they could actually hit them.
Russia is a big country, which means that getting in far enough to hit the "good stuff" isn't easy, but it also means that protecting it all now that Ukraine has made inroads is also going to be difficult.
Works fine with acme certs though
The apps keep a synced local copy, so if the server is down or unreachable you can still get to your passwords. That can also be locked by biometrics etc.
There's a lot of stuff that without be lost by going to just the web interface
Honestly, I'm pretty sure most R voters are just looking for the letter next to the name and not the name itself these days