phx

Many of the articles are in Swedish, so are subject to translation errors , but: It seems to mostly center around one of the co-CEO's personal donations to recent populist party that has hardline views regarding immigration. The other co-CEO spoke out against the donation but as it wasn't tied to the company there's likely not much more to be done there.

Absent a particular stance on such from Örebropartiet, I don't see how this is impactful to the nature of privacy under VPN's, and IMO is different from a CEO or founder fawning over a government that's actively creating a surveillance-state.

Yeah. It seems most time one of these criminals is outed it's a Hispanic name. Not sure if that's representative of the overall ICE population or they just do a better job at hiding/protecting the white dudes committing crimes

I have a picture in my head of Death hanging out on a lounge chair saying "Donald what? Why would I ever want him".

Then a zoom out and all the good ones are all just chillin' together with ol' Grim.

Soverin for email. Been trying various options for VPN including Mullvad

Yup. This presidency is but an example of how a man became great, but rather how an institution became increasingly foul.

Unfortunately I can't send a message by cancelling. Fortunately it's because I already saw their CEO was a fascist-supporting duck dickwad who only paid lip service to privacy/security in the name of profit (so I went with different companies for my VPN/email/etc needs).

Overseas versions of domestic chains often seem to be better, presumably because people there wouldn't put up with substandard fare or to make market entry easier.

KFC in Asia is pretty good. Pizza Hut locations are actually a decent dining experience as well.

An exception to this would be the Tim Hortons stores they tried to open in Korea. Just as meh as here - maybe with less hobo BO in the corner table - and you could get better, fresher options within a block for the same price or better.

Honestly, I'm pretty sure most R voters are just looking for the letter next to the name and not the name itself these days

Foot doesn't have enough holes in it yet, apparently

For people that promote one over the other, my answer is always "why not both"?

Areas that are good for nuclear are likely not as good for solar or wind. The latter two are generally more sustainable, but also more temperamental towards environmental conditions for output.

So my thought is, built all three in the locations best suited to whatever, and also build to storage capacity where possible to manage peak/off-peak loads.

There was, but in replacing ME1 I've found that many of the side missions were similarly filler, not to mention the whole scanning thing. ME2 was the best of the series in this regard.

The story is decent enough, but the missions definitely had some "filler". Its biggest issue was that way launch it was a buggy mess