qjkxbmwvz

joined 1 year ago
[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 15 points 4 months ago

UPS and American companies in general

But this is USPS, which isn't an American company, it's a US independent agency.

Their mandate isn't (AFAIK...) to make a profit, but rather to serve the mail requirements of a very large country.

Personally, my experiences with USPS have been generally positive, from passports for infants to free change-of-address forwarding service to tracking down quasi-scam products from Amazon. YMMV though.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 10 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I think there's a bias in the US against this sort of thing that doesn't exist (or not to the same extent) in Europe due to the age of the cities/buildings.

In the US, a building from the 1700s is a historic artifact to be cherished, while in parts of Europe a building from the 1500s is just the local pub.

So, the US is often hesitant to modify these old buildings, but Europe seems to have more of a perspective of "it's a building, not a museum, let's give it new life by modifying it."

This is just from the perspective of me, from the US


and I think these old/new buildings are really neat!

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Well yes, but so is Canada, which has a higher HDI than the US.

Parent was asking why Mexico is excluded from the list while Canada is not.

By "don't have incentive" I'm just referring to an on-paper incentive from an HDI ranking.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Canada has roughly the same HDI ranking as the US, whereas Mexico is somewhat lower. So from the "looking for a better life" perspective, Canadians don't have an incentive to move to the US (other way around actually, from HDI).

Just a guess though.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 2 points 4 months ago

Janeway's toilet would just be full of coffee that's had the caffeine extracted. So...decaf. Blech!

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 13 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Not to mention mortgage interest.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 0 points 4 months ago

Economic policies, sure. But there are social policies and perhaps more importantly a culture of intolerance that can affect people over a wide range of economic status.

I think I'd just add "straight white people" to the qualifier and then I'd agree though.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 5 points 4 months ago

https://www.gocomics.com/shen-comix/2019/11/15

It was originally posted in 2019. Joke of course being that things associated with the 1920s would be relevant again in the 2020s.

Comic then shared as a meme with the 3rd panel being replaced with other panels. https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/things-were-bringing-back-in-the-2020s

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 1 points 4 months ago

IIRC that was the release that cleaned up the make output substantially.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 1 points 4 months ago

Ok so it is fully qualified then? I'm just confused because it sounded like you were saying I wasn't using the term correctly in your other comment.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Hmm, my understanding was that FQDN means that anyone will resolve the domain to e.g. the same IP address? Which is the case here (unless DNS rebinding mitigations or similar are employed)


but it doesn't resolve to the same physical host in this case since it's a private IP. Wikipedia:

A fully qualified domain name is distinguished by its lack of ambiguity in terms of DNS zone location in the hierarchy of DNS labels: it can be interpreted only in one way.

In my example, I can run nslookup jellyfin.myexample.com 8.8.8.8 and it resolves to what I expect (a local IP address).

But IANA network professional by any means, so maybe I'm misusing the term?

view more: ‹ prev next ›