roboticide

joined 1 year ago
[–] roboticide@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

They point to women's impressive performance in extreme distance events, like 100+ mile ultra marathons.

But that runs head long into the question of "How far do you have to actually chase an animal for it to collapse from exhaustion?" I'm having a hard time finding hard numbers but I don't think gazelle have the endurance to run 10+ miles before collapsing. So women may be biologically equipped for ultra-long distances, but I don't see how this correlates to endurance hunting as that advantage doesn't play out hunting game.

That's not to say the basis for the theory on male hunters/female gatherers is not without flaw, but the arguments being made against it don't seem to really be citing evidence that backs up women being significant, let alone dominant, in that role either.

[–] roboticide@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Three of nine justices wanted to.

[–] roboticide@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Sure, but it's also taking longer than it should. It's also, fundamentally, not hard for even many conservatives to accept as "not that bad."

Legalized prostitution also has tremendous potential for new markets and profit, but it's a lot harder for conservatives to accept compared to weed, as America is just too goddamn puritanical.

[–] roboticide@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Buddy, we're still working on legalizing an absurdly common plant because for a while much of the country thought it was satanic or whatever.

"In this day and age," in America, of course it's not legal yet. That is gonna take a long time.

[–] roboticide@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (37 children)

Presumably people who bought NFTs. If you're going to trick yourself into thinking your dumb, AI-generated piece of shitty "art" was a worthwhile investment, you might as well enjoy the perks of being in such an exclusive, stupid club.

[–] roboticide@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

I was thinking "Maybe he was more moderate or even liberal, but just knew there's no getting elected without an (R) in small town Alabama politics, and so ran as a Republican anyway." The inverse happens in our town - we're so blue, we occasionally get conservatives running as Democrats just to have a shot.

But then he ran for re-election in 2020 and used publicity of him and Trump together to get re-elected, which is farther than any actual moderate would go. So he's either a massive hypocrite to the LGBT community or a massive hypocrite to the Conservative community, but either way, wasn't super bright if he was posting all this publicly to Reddit as an elected figure. Shame he felt the need to shoot himself. Could have just moved to a blue state.

[–] roboticide@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In my experience, ad personalization is still so bad it has no impact, like in your last example. But at least now I'm not seeing random shit. I don't really bother to try and counter targeted ads, and the vast majority of the ads I get are for products I actually already bought or never intended to buy but was researching for other purposes. Yes, Google knows I spent a lot of time researching drills, but guess what, Home Depot isn't telling them I bought a drill, so I'll get drill ads for a month. And yeah, I looked at a bunch of luxury sail yachts, private jets, and cars, but it's not because I suddenly make more money. It's because I'm interested in design and engineering. But Google just stupidly assumes I became a billionaire overnight and gives me 100' yacht ads.

I'd honestly be more worried about a random ad getting lucky and pre-emptively catching my interest. Targeted ads are so reactive it's not a problem.

[–] roboticide@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Read the article. The UAW has just signed a ~5 year contract, expiring in 2028. He's calling for other unions, between now and then, to align their contract expirations with the UAW's. This is not something that's possible to do in a short period of time, because it relies upon various other union contracts ending, and realistically by the time we get to 2026/2027 no union is going to sign a sub-2 year contract.

It's kind of dumb, I kind of think they're doing it for PR, but it also is a reasonable strategy.

[–] roboticide@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, good journalism costs money and journalists deserve a living wage. Everyone hates ads, so what does that leave reputable sites that don't want to just be shills?

Maybe for that specific article it's ironic, but it's not like the Wired web page is bothering to check what the headline it's serving is before asking readers to sign up.

"Free and open internet" still costs a ton of money. Not everyone is able, nor should be expected to volunteer their time to provide content or services to others for free.

[–] roboticide@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Exactly! And it's not like crossover content doesn't happen between publishers already without blockchain. Look at Fortnite. All it takes is a promo code.

[–] roboticide@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

The belief amongst some is that reddit basically did a rug pull. People could and would buy these crypto points with real money, so reddit likely made money. Odds are it just was not successful outside of niche subreddits, hence:

Its newer Contributor Program, which rewards users with actual money from the Reddit gold and karma they accrue, is one such example. "Part of why we're moving past this product is that we've already launched, or are actively investing in, several products that accomplish what the Community Points program was trying to accomplish, while being easier to adopt and understand," Reddit’s director of consumer and product communications, Tim Rathschmidt, told TechCrunch.

Crypto also hopefully seems to be on the decline, and it's possible Reddit did not want to appear to be behind the times.

[–] roboticide@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ford C-suite took home $71 million in 2021 (most recent year I could find data). They could give each worker a $1000+ bonus and still walk away with $10 million. Not that $1000 is enough for each worker, but just to illustrate that there is a ton of money floating around, they just don't want the workers to have it. It's not future investment they're worried about (they get massive tax breaks for all these new facilities, and new car designs are all being done by salaried white collar engineers anyway), it's shareholder profits. Ford doesn't want to lower their reported annual profits by increasing their worker costs.

Fuck shareholders, and fuck the C-suite for looking out for their interests instead of their workers. They don't actually produce anything. The workers are the real company asset here, not some Wall Street goon who bought stock.

view more: next ›