stevedice

joined 4 weeks ago
[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 7 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (3 children)

But not everybody is making a statement about morality. He's purportedly saying "capital punishment is bad and we should get rid of it". If you make exceptions, all you're saying is that you're in favor of keeping it around for really bad people, which is exactly where they are now.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

That's the point of taking a "moral stance against federal executions", though — nobody deserves it.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago

He could be sending a message, and that's what Trump is actually pissed about.

That actually makes sense.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

That may be true but singling out 3 people who are currently harmless and saying "you get to die" feels somehow different.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 12 points 17 hours ago (10 children)

I understand that and, if you ask me, those 3 guys are pos. My problem is that he said he did it to take a moral stance against death penalty. You can't do that and go "except for these 3 cases".

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 54 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (36 children)

While I'm overall glad about this, leaving 3 unpardoned inmates really corrupts the "moral stance against federal executions" justification and makes it seem like he is in favor of capital punishment but only for people he thinks deserve it. It also makes it seem like he believes it's his decision to decide who gets to live and that rubs me the wrong way.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works -5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I know it's a joke, but Mexico has been a US colony since the NAFTA was established.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 5 points 19 hours ago

Mexican here. Those are the states unpleasant accents so I'm on board with this plan.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 4 points 19 hours ago

I will look into this and adjust my behaviour accordingly. Been meaning to get a bidet anyway.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago

Yes, that's ideal

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works -3 points 23 hours ago (13 children)

Expensive, yeah; wasteful, no. It might even save toilet paper for people like OOP since it requires less wiping.

view more: next ›