sukhmel

Might be the case, but I expect some things to be true, like desperation score and profit squeezing. I met call centre managers that were trying to optimise how little should workers spend without the call in progress, that might sound reasonable but they tried to ‘improve’ from less than 10s between calls already

I believe such petty technicalities should not bother the flight of your imagination

I believe you also upvote and downvote, but I want to emphasize that it's up- and downvotes you gave, not the ones you received

https://lemvotes.org/user/Formfiller@lemmy.world

I think, the point was: you up-/downvote something on abc.xyz, but lemvotes is not federated with abc.xyz, then it doesn't count that vote.

Don't know if that's any close to reality, though

Imagine how unbelievably good must be those 19 posts they upvoted

Paper has auto-ignition temperature higher than 420°F, I would expect wood to be at least same as paper or higher

Edit: ok, I found a link to the study that says the wood will ignite at a lower temperature but will require some time (maybe the same is true for paper, now I'm not sure, it definitely chars in the oven)

Also gold:

The compiler assumes mutable references are unique and optimizes based on that. When you break the assumption, the optimizer generates wrong code. Compiler skill issue.

It's the latter

Depends on what the job is, I guess

A better question would be ratio of fingers to persons, because lost fingers ≠ lost hand, and the ratio would be more sensitive to changes

Yeah, we should just wait 2.5 million years for the next message to come, or twice that for a reply