I think that if public transport is using that road, the bus will still transport more people/day, but I'm a bit uncertain if much of public transport is available in this case, or pretty much anywhere in the US
sukhmel
Wow, that's a good one, I should remember to try next time I drive
But yeah, I ride a bicycle, so what do I know about safety anyway. So touching when people remove bike lanes to improve traffic, because they care <3
I guessed, because probably Fuck would also be removed. That's on point, still
Also, a fraction of cyclists riding non-electric bikes have a habit of moving faster than 18 mph, by the looks of it maybe even 30 mph
But since I'm barely capable of passing 18 mph limit myself, and usually prefer to ride even slower, I am not quite sure how fast are they
Yeah, auto-censored Lemmy instances are peak freedom, indeed
And it took them 3 years to finish
Wait, can't this presumed ~~weapon of mass rustification~~ coreutils clone be also re-published under GPL?
Yeah, this whole meme just looks like ‘I hate Rust and don't want it anywhere’
Of course, there is importance in trying it everywhere, because it shows where the language and ecosystem lacks and can evolve; but beside that, I think adoption by big companies wouldn't happen if it wasn't any good as some want to believe
We had to use Nix to build Rust services and make containers of them. It works pretty well, except with Nix 2.29 and 2.30 where it is broken for some reason
Wait, so you say res_res?? gives more information than res_res.flatten()?, do you?
I mean, this is a very trivial case and not best suited for flatten at all, but the information is lost in exactly the same way
This, it's not a thing that happens often, but there were a couple of times when flatten would've been handy
This was also usually a result of a chain of and_then that could do with some flattening. This could've been rewritten as a separate function to make use of ?, but it seems to be a bigger trouble than use
How is it that 68 cyclists are 5 cars?