sukhmel

I'm guessing, they mean the user of a future that already exists as it is, what you mean is you can implement a future that would provide a way for the code inside to know of being cancelled. But most of the time you don't do that, and a function that was polled once and then dropped will never know about that

Besides with software industry being pretty big, I think that the crisis may take another 50 years before having an effect they describe, not many of laid off now people will be able to wait for it

His economic strategy, too

I wonder if there was no known philosopher with that idea and the question author speaks of themselves in third person 🌚

They printed on paper to later re-trace the shape on fabric manually

I expect this to only work like that if done by enough countries in coordination, otherwise China will likely trade with others more, and suffer way less than the ones trying to pull them. But I hope we will not have to witness if that is so

Oh, TIL, thought it's too random for use by humans

very versatile word

So, pretty much anything and sometimes exact opposite thing 🥲

There are also swamp mummies that happened because the swamp may lack oxygen that is needed for proper decomposition. Those are not human-made, of course

Probably not, but I also never seen MM used for millions, usually just M as opposed to k used for thousands

Be the change you want to see

I'm not even sure in that, some Early Access games seem to have a pretty substantial price tag. But those also usually don't feel as unpolished