theneverfox

joined 2 years ago
[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 3 weeks ago

Exactly. I think that's valid, although I'd personally create a fake make and model too

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 3 weeks ago

He really wasn't. He had been out of the writing process for multiple seasons, they had him recording off site

The cracks have been showing for years now, I won't deny he has an energy to his voice acting, but the replacements are fine. The problem is the writing

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social -4 points 3 weeks ago

No, humans can't, scholars can. Most humans could learn historical materialism to the level they could pass a course on it, but the vast majority can't apply this type of analytical lens in practice.

It's a matter of disposition, the ability to look at a situation from multiple angles and question your beliefs about it isn't something that can be taught, only learned. You can walk someone through it step by step over and over, even train them to go through a process when prompted, but without a certain disposition they'll never actually use this ability without promoting

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 3 weeks ago

Study finds rising seas could flood facilities handling waste, sewage, and oil and gas – and coastal states most at risk

You don't say...

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 6 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Ironically, that would probably end up with a different season of slop

The writers haven't been subtle, though the episodes they've been directly saying they don't know what people want from them and they keep getting told to be more like season 1

Well, we got something like season 1. The characters undid their character development and the episodes are aimless riffs off of classic sci-fi and cosmic horror

I think I'd just get the writing staff off of social media and pay them to hang out in a comfy room until they have an idea they're excited about again

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 7 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

I kind of think this is valid. If you have a Tesla, you need to apologize for it

I'm not getting down in the weeds, seeing when you got the Tesla and how that pans out. I don't care, maybe you have your reasons. I don't know you

But it is not optional to disavow Elon

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Because that's not how people think. Not anyone.

You can study history, and if you do it right you'll see how stupid and individually directed most things are. It's all conspiracies, that's how the world has worked for millennia

One realization doesn't free your mind and make you a scholar... That's just not how humans work

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 8 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, honestly I think it's a little dumb, but they seemed to be having fun with it. It's not even like it's that hard to read, they put way more effort into it than it takes to read it

We need to be way more ok with people getting a little weird with it

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social -2 points 3 weeks ago

It's an inside joke. When something reminds you of the joke, you reference it in a way that might not be meaningful unless you're in on the joke

There's no joke here. You're not remembering something funny and connecting it to the current situation, it's just a thing people do sometimes now

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 0 points 3 weeks ago

It started from the song Doot Doot by Skrilla, LeBron was just one of the first vectors that memified it

And I don't even want to know how you think AI chased it down, there's a ton of video essays about it

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 4 points 3 weeks ago

We don't know if Putin has the pictures, just the they exist

Also, the Epstein files are coming, we won. Next round is when the picture isn't in the released files

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social -1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

You're just wrong, this has been chased down because it's so odd, it came from a music video

And damn Daniel references the skit it came from, it has something to do with what someone is wearing. You can just say it, but then it is a verbal tic

I think that's actually a good way to put it. Verbal tics aren't funny or interesting, and 6-7 is purely a verbal tic

view more: ‹ prev next ›