Not listing QB as a Pats need is hilarious
watsonthedragon
joined 1 year ago
Why is that a mess? If you’re just trying to make a list of players better than one guy then it makes sense to go team by team and list everyone better. He’s not ranking them in order.
I'd argue Cs have best 3, 4, 5, and 6
1 is Denver
2 is up for grabs
I don't really agree with the counter-argument here about Tua without Hill succeeding more than Hill without Tua.
If Tua loses Hill, he still has 90% of his other starters on the field, replacing 10% with a backup. If Hill loses Tua, he's replacing 100% of the guy who needs to get him the ball with a backup.
I must be missing something cause I feel like Anthony Edwards is the most overhyped player in some time.
Porzingis
No, you heathen.