this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
497 points (99.6% liked)

Not The Onion

22064 readers
1532 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today 41 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I have lived in the bible belt all my life, still trying to escape. People are proud of their beliefs even though they aren't true. "Everyone is entitled to their beliefs" is the common sentiment, but it's wrong. Everyone is morally obligated to align their beliefs with reality as closely as they can.

That's where science comes in. It is not an authority, not a religion, not a system. It is a process we use to acquire and refine knowledge. Given the physical limitations of our senses and minds, it is the best we can do.

People need to learn before we all die of stupid.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Everyone is entitled to their beliefs

That is such a stupid saying, basically it's true that people are entitled to their beliefs, but that doesn't make their beliefs worthy in any way, and it definitely doesn't mean crazy beliefs have to be respected, and it also doesn't mean they deserve special consideration.
Everybody is also entitled to jump off a cliff, but what would be the point of such a statement?
Americans fail to debunk the widespread insanity as a society, and as a result the insanity is spreading.

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I don't really wish death upon anyone, but there are definitely times when I wish we hadn't been able to tackle COVID so quickly. Much more significant losses of people who obstinately refused to buy into the science would likely have made us come out of it FAR stronger than we did. We might not even have had Trump around any longer since he apparently got an early access dose of treatment.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

he got access to the expensive monoclonal treatment, definitely not accesible to even normal health insurance customers.

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 1 points 8 hours ago

Ah, TYVM for jogging my crappy memory on that. The fact I still don't understand what that is probably didn't help me remember.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It wasn't an early access dose of treatment outside the US, my (unconnected) grandpa got the same stuff at almost exactly the same time in a country with proper healthcare.

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

No offense, but that's irrelevant since we're talking the rules the US was operating under. I'm glad your grandpa was able to access it earlier than we could, but it doesn't change the reality we were working with here.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The point is, that scarcity in America had no bearing on if Trump would have gotten it. If there hadn't been one dose of vaccine in America, or even if it had been illegal to dispense, Trump would have had it within 12 hours of thinking it was better to have that shot than risk the most important person in his world suffer an early death.

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

We all know that. I don't see how that's relevant to what I was originally saying.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Ah, so your fervent wish is that the whole world was as dumb as the average American, and that if it was bad enough then millions of stupid Americans and Trump would have died. In that case, you're right, my previous comment was totally irrelevant.

This stupid wish doesn't need a cursed monkey's paw, the nicest genie in the world couldn't have made this turn out okay.

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Wow. That's... one interpretation. Did you miss taking your meds this morning?

We're done here. I'm not dealing with someone so uncivil and plainly itching for an argument - I've already dealt with one of those recently & had my fill of bullshit. Good luck to you in getting your easily inflamed rage under control.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

My interpretation? Here you are talking about my rage while you lay on the ad hominems. The closest I got to a personal attack is saying your wish is hopelessly stupid, which is an attack on the statement and not the person. I'd like to say your responses are projection, but that would be an insufficiantly informed personal attack. Likewise, good luck.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Heh, you think those rules were real and not just artificial scarcity used to prop up the price tag?

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
  • There was no (direct) price tag in this instance. I'm sure we paid significantly for it through taxes, but how do you put a value on millions of lives?
  • Yes, those rules were real, and had been in place for quite some time. They were actually somewhat pared back for this issue.
[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Rules aren't real if they're only real for you.

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They were real for most everybody, with a path to exceptions in place for cases where it was a potential last ditch method of saving someone's life. Trump's treatment seemed to have bypassed even that process, but given the time constraints it was understandable.

Are we done with the inane & irrelevant arguments now?

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Clearly not, you're still talking.

I think you're just too poor and American to understand.

[–] GojuRyu@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

I’m European and wouldn’t consider myself poor and I still think you are making irrelevant points at best or is simply wrong.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

I think you're just too poor

Wow, eurotrash gloating about the 20€ in their bank account. How European