this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
476 points (97.2% liked)

Not The Onion

12319 readers
598 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The bipartisan police state everyone. We need to pass electoral reform so we can choose to be free.

Switching away from first past the post voting makes third parties viable and eliminates the spoiler effect. Just search for videos on FPTP voting if you want an explanation on how and why first past the post voting makes third parties not viable.

Electoral reform is possible in each individual state (for now), we dont need federal reform! Maine and Alaska have already passed electoral reform.

So what’s the hold up with the rest of the states? Consider starring a campaign to chanfe how we vote in your own state! Force our representatives to compete with fresh outside ideas. We deserve the best representation, not excuses.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 5 points 7 months ago

I don't believe voting reform alone will solve the two party problem, since we continue to have single-winner elections. We will need to push through voting reform and add-on some kind of proportional representation (my favorite is Sequential Proportional Approval Voting). Then we'll have a real chance for minor parties to have representation in office, instead of just at the bottom of the ballot box.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I wonder if FPTP and/or winner take all elections inevitably lead to some kind of tyranny by the majority.

[–] Veraxus@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

“Tyranny of the majority” is nothing more than an anti-democratic authoritarian dog whistle.

FPTP is easily manipulated, abused, and prone to corruption… allowing a MINORITY to seize power from the majority by limiting/controlling the people’s options.

[–] PotatoKat@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Except in the US a tyranny of the majority isn't even what is happening. All the shitty things that are happening are wanted by a minority of the population.