this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
147 points (99.3% liked)

Not The Onion

12224 readers
985 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DMBFFF@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago (1 children)
  1. oral contract
  2. If it was important, she should have prepared a back-up.
[–] escew@lemmy.world 30 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It’s already been dismissed by the tribunal. Hilarious that it got enough attention to be in the news.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Thankfully all the attention is negative

[–] DMBFFF@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I'd cut her a bit of slack.

She might have been dreaming of this for a long time, she thought that she could trust her boyfriend to do this simple and easy task, but one very important to her, and he fails to do it, and since they're in a relationship, one doesn't think of writing stuff down.

If it happened as reported, I agree with the ruling, but I wouldn't be so quick to ridicule her.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

In the situation you're presenting, I would be empathetic to her loss of the money and experience. However, all of that empathy disappears when she tries to sue because of it. The ridicule is for suing.