this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
1033 points (99.3% liked)

News

23274 readers
3382 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Qkall@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 months ago (4 children)

yeah... i don't think harris is the answer....

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 58 points 3 months ago (5 children)

If Harris is in, she can use the money already donated. Otherwise they have to start from scratch.

So it's almost guaranteed Harris will be in. Who they pick for VP is the question.

[–] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee 17 points 3 months ago

Can they still keep her as VP and put someone else on as prez?

[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I find this so insane. People talk about who gets to keep the money, who has which rich asshole routing for them, which strategy has been successfull in the past, like always setting up the current president for reelection...

We need to focus on who has actually inspiring policies and ideas. We need to focus on these, because that is what the Reps lack. All they offer is "not the Dems" while the policies they propose are actually unpopular with many of their base. And the whole "Not Trump" strategy of Biden just fell apart.

Is there noone in the Democratic party who can actually come up with a coherent vision of the future and inspire people to follow it?

[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 5 points 3 months ago

Is there no one in the Democratic party who can actually come up with a coherent vision of the future and inspire people to follow it?

This is why I think Pete Buttigieg should throw his hat in if they do have a primary. He just had a Bill Maher interview that just went viral because he knows how to talk to the common people. I think his visions are inspiring, he’s done a lot of work for his department, and he isn’t afraid to walk across party lines and go on Republican shows to talk about the real problems. He’s smart enough to smash Trump in a debate, calling out all his lies, and even if Trump is too scared to debate him, he has no problem laying out Trump’s lies elsewhere coherently and cognitively.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

On the one hand: "you can't have her she's ours!". On the other, she's out in 26 regardless, and she's pretty good so maybe we can share with the rest of the country.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

No, they don't. The Democratic Party can give the donated money to whoever is the candidate. Not sure where people are getting that.

Edit: After reading up, I am mistaken kind of. If Harris is still the VP candidate, the money could be used. Otherwise a PAC would have to be setup to funnel money to the candidate...maybe. Bloomberg was simply able to transfer his campaign funds directly to the DNC since it was part of his campaign money...even though the vast majority of it was his own money.

[–] mrlavallee@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The money Biden has raised directly however can only go to the people that were on his ticket at the time the donation was made

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's correct, but nearly none of the money is the direct donation stuff - it's almost in PACs which are (due to a legal fiction) entirely independent of the candidate.

[–] mrlavallee@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

There are still more restrictions however on spending on other candidates and they would have to act like any other PAC, only helping via donating/running ads in support of (but importantly not directly by) any other candidate.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The $100 million warchest belongs to the Biden/Harris campaign, not the Democratic Party. They are separate organizations, and Biden/Harris only answers to Biden and Harris.

The DNC has its own funds of course, but nowhere near as much. And DNC funds are supposed to be shared with multiple Democrats, not just the one running for president.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 months ago

And notably even if Biden/Harris were supporting the alternative, they're an outside group. They can spend like a super PAC, but can't pay bills or do direct advertising.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I don't particularly like her, then again I detest nearly all politicians. That being said, I'm more motivated to vote, that's for certain. I didn't mind Biden, but it felt like elder abuse lol. He's been better than anyone in my lifetime. Good God, I'd rather have her than Hilary as the first woman in the spot. Biden was just hard to watch and that position needs someone that will have to live with the consequences of the decisions in office. Will be curious to see who else puts their name in. 4 years ago he said he wouldn't run again and he seems to be keeping that promise too. If they were clever, they'd put Biden as VP or as an advisor.

She'll have to be. Anybody else would be starting from square one, and that's a luxury we don't have right now.

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Half of America lost it's mind when Obama was elected, and we're still dealing with the fallout from that lovely dose of racism. There's no way Kamala could win in this country.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 18 points 3 months ago

Obama won. And then won again. Stop pumping up the reactionaries as some unstoppable force. They're a minority and have been on a long term losing streak.

[–] Qkall@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

like all that aside, a lot of folks aren't appreciative of her background as a cop... but yeah that's a cherry to what you already mentioned

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And a lot of swing voters will probably like that she was a prosecutor, a "law and order" type.

[–] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think most of the "law and order" types might have a bigger problem with her being a black woman.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

She aint "black" as much as "brown." Its an incredibly stupid hair to split, but indians are generally considered a "model minority" by racists, so it will likely hurt her but not as much as you may think.

[–] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Isn't she half-black and half-Indian? Or am I mistaken on that?

Regardless, the flame out of Bobby Jindal shows what those folks think of Indians anyway.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

No, you're right. I honestly forgot she was half black.

I guess I hope the "moderate" racists do as well.

[–] nao@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago

still the other half was enough to elect him