this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
189 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3118 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 117 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

.......yeah, ok. Sounds good.

moves to California

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 22 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

I’ve got “Hotel California” and “San Francisco” battling it out in my head now.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 32 minutes ago

California Girls. And I'm not specifying which one

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The fact that ya didnt list California Dreamin annoys me.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago

The mamas and papas make me want to punch myself when I hear them.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

How about Going to California?

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

"someone told me there's a girl out there, with love in her eyes and flowers in her hair"

Damn is that a great little tune, such a warm sound too

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

They both somehow fit the situation.

[–] Alteon@lemmy.world 18 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

It'll never happen. US Military would never willingly split itself apart, let itself get split apart, or let another nation that it's not allied with have any sort of Army on its equivalent. The 50 states are here to stay.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 32 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Never say never. The domestic terrorists/agents of Putin are aching for an actual shooting civil war.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Even a peaceful division of the US would be something they would seriously benefit from. The US permanently divided against itself, each side easy to manipulate into a military conflict against the other. We would have nukes pointed at each other within a decade. It would be like the splitting of India and Pakistan, along with all the accompanying human rights atrocities.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 3 minutes ago

Also how long before an invasion? They’re fascists, fascists don’t sit still while experiencing consequences, they invade

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ThrowawayInTheYear23@lemmy.world 25 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Sherman should have kept burning the traitors.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Dude should have gone west after Savannah, Atlanta has its shit mostly together now

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 31 minutes ago (1 children)
[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 2 points 28 minutes ago

Agreed, but that seems more a reaction to the progress than a symptom of it not happening.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The US military is going to be replaced by Trump loyalists. Whatever he wants to happen is what’s gonna happen.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 26 minutes ago (1 children)

I doubt it. He can barely run his shit past the civilian government. I'd be surprised if he knows that the UCMJ exists. The brass aren't going to just fall in line, they know what an illegal order is, and what to do when they are given one.

He may manage to be the first POTUS that is ever told by the military that they have no confidence in him, and will refuse to take orders from him.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 2 points 14 minutes ago (1 children)

Maybe. But I also see a lot of trump support within the military. I really don’t think it will be as cut and dry as you say. Especially if he goes through with his prosecuting and removal of every military officer involved in the Afghanistan exit, which to me just seems like a way to pick and choose loyalists in his military.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 9 minutes ago

That's the thing he is going to find out. There are procedures for these things, and I seriously doubt that he can luck into getting consistent panels of 5 JAG that will throw the book at people over fabricated evidence. Also what he isn't taking into account is that all of them have the defence that he ordered them to do it, so the buck stops with him. Having the military put the POTUS under military tribunal because he forced them to would be pretty funny though.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 hours ago

It's expansive here in the places you may want to live, but seriously... It's worth it. There's also a lot of cheap places that aren't as ideal.