this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
1360 points (99.3% liked)

News

23644 readers
4564 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Reddit’s r/medicine moderators deleted a thread where doctors and users harshly criticized murdered UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.

Comments, including satirical rejections of insurance claims for gunshot wounds, targeted UHC’s reputation for denying care to boost profits.

Despite the removal, similar discussions continue, with medical professionals condemning UHC’s business practices under Thompson’s leadership, which a Senate report recently criticized for denying post-acute care.

Thompson, shot in what appears to be a targeted attack, led a company notorious for its high claim denial rates, fueling ongoing debates about corporate ethics in healthcare.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 75 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

At least one of the mods here was going heavy censorship in the initial thread here yesterday. I get it, we aren't supposed to celebrate the death or suffering of other human beings. I'm not sure that rule applied to this individual though.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 46 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Who says we're not supposed to celebrate when an asshole dies? We celebrated for Hitler and Kissinger

Don't self censor. Fuck the mods that censor us celebrating assholes who die by documenting the truth of the harm they've done on Earth

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Every time I'm reminded Kissinger is dead my black, shriveled heart glows a little

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Shame about the AI slop.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Who says we’re not supposed to celebrate when an asshole dies? We celebrated for Hitler and Kissinger

I'd be more nuanced. I don't mind him being dead, but I don't celebrate it either, because it took out the public-display figure instead of the people (shareholders) that actually cause the practices.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago

When the system is so corrupted that it no longer delivers justice, people are going to improvise other means.

I'm not advocating it or saying it's a bad thing, just making an observation.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

They guy is a symbol of injustice, as well as just a person. You can celebrate that part, without tangling it up with the worry about his family.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 3 points 2 weeks ago

We can celebrate both

[–] josefo@leminal.space 36 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

CEOs and billionaires get their human status revoked, so the rule doesn't apply.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 weeks ago

They don't get it revoked. They give it up when they forsake everyone else's wellbeing for the all-mighty dollar.

[–] gerbler@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

People always forget the second part of that rule.

We shouldn't celebrate the death or suffering of other human beings........ Unless that human being is a billionaire.

Don't like people celebrating your suffering? Give up your wealth. Easy as.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Anyone that doesn't want themselces to experience the event of "winning capitalism," and them dying should donate every single penny of their wealth over, and I'm being generous here, $100,000,000 to The Sovereign Fund for Humanity's Poor, and ensure that they are always below the $100,000,000 threshold each quarter. Anything less is admitting that you want to be a charicature of a dragon. Dragons don't amass more than $1,200,000,000 in wealth in any of High Fantasy. Other than Smaug. He might have hoarded as much as $5,000,000,000 to $10,000,000,000 in gold, and he's literally the only outlier in all of High Fantasy.

Shadowrun isn't high fantasy, that is Science Fantasy, just like Star Wars.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

The thing is, if you don't want to be a billionaire then that still leaves you - assuming normal rounding - with ~500 MILLION of wealth. If you can't snort all the cocaine you'd ever want in your life from that amount, I don't know...

[–] rothaine@lemm.ee 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Was he a billionaire though? Like don't get me wrong, fuck that guy, but I think he may have only been a multi-millionaire

[–] gerbler@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You know you're right. He was only worth 43 million dollars. I'd say we can revise the rule to somewhere in that area. Maybe take some points off for being a CEO of a health insurance company.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Well also because he was likely just a pawn. at the root of all this are the shareholders who are billionaires and who likely make the calls regarding company policies. this guy was likely just their lapdog. so even though a rule of no more than 500mil would not deal with this guy, it would definitely have prevented the existence of a parasite company of this scale. I would still say though 50 mil should be sufficient. It will allow you almost all the reasonable luxuries you can imagine if that is your thing.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

He had more than $100,000,000 in wealth. He had been paid more than $50,000,000 per year for the last 2 years.

No one needs more than $100,000,000.

[–] rothaine@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago

Really it's just a reminder of how ENORMOUS a billion dollars is

[–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

His base salary was 1 million in 2022 and he had a net worth of 43 million as of February this year, which includes his stocks. Why are you making shit up?

[–] Earflap@reddthat.com 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But then I'll be a dirty nasty poor like the rest of you!

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Theres no poors here, we all say we are "working class". Although many of us certainly remember being poor.

[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

It's ok. They're not human.

They're parasites. And should be [redacted]

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It still should. The paradox of tolerance just means you have to not tolerate the intolerant, not actively mock them. I mean sometimes that can be fun, but let's be honest, they even took out the wrong guy (they'll just get a new CEO who'll hardline the stance even more and waste money on a ton of bodyguards, hopefully at least Gaddafi-style). Should have gone after the shareholders, that'll really hurt the business model after all. The CEO is just a representative figure who puts his name under decisions that are 99,5% not driven by him.

Was is still the correct choice to take him out because he is a billionaire and a murderous asshole? I'll say no, because I don't believe in death penalty on account of it being too lenient. Should have thrown him down a well and let him starve slowly, or at least delivered death by immurement or something. Something slow, ideally decades slow. But that's besides the point, overall he also deserves fuck all sympathy because he was still a) a billionaire and b) the CEO of one of the most cruel companies around, rivaling black ops stuff and far outdoing them in the lives lost to their practices.

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Speaking of the pradoxof tolerance, Karl Popper realized that intolerance often involves violence.
I, for one would argue that health insurance denying claims arbitrarily asserts violence in some way - even worse to especially vulnerable people.

So how do you imagine not tolerating this kind of intolerance?
Writing stern letters and emails? That seems to have happened.
Starting a legal battle that might be decided in your favour after you've died from not receiving health care due to denied claims?
What would you suggest?

Popper also draws attention to the fact that intolerance is often asserted through the use of violence [...]

Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance#Proposed_solutions