this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
566 points (99.1% liked)

News

37835 readers
1975 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump is nullifying federal employee union contracts negotiated in Biden’s final days.

Affected contracts include one with the Education Department ratified just before his inauguration. Trump cited a 2010 Supreme Court decision to justify his stance but did not provide a clear legal basis.

Federal employee unions, representing 800,000 workers, vowed legal action, calling Trump’s move unlawful intimidation.

This continues Trump’s prior efforts to weaken job protections, with additional plans to reclassify and lay off civil servants.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 101 points 1 year ago (4 children)

That's also pretty damn close to what Trump genuinely wants - for everyone currently doing the work to quit. That way he can install lackeys across the board.

Strikes normally work because the other side wants something - usually the business owner wants labor to create a product. That isn't the case here.

I'm not saying it's pointless, but the classic strategies will need to be rethought.

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

unions around the country need to join in sympathy strikes

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Half the unions will be dissolved due to lack of work shortly, anyway.

[–] HailSeitan@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Sympathy strikes are illegal in the US. Not saying wildcat strikes wouldn’t be justified, but there is a deliberate policy to undermine this type of broader solidarity.

[–] Sonicdemon86@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Who cares if they are illegal, they want us to be afraid. I'd say do the stikes, what they gonna do arrest everyone in the country?

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

This, at this point we're uhh.. kinda... fucked

I mean honestly, this country has needed a good general strike for a long fucking time, for a lot of reasons.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, people need to realize unions and labor movements are about power, not a codified system of rules. "Legal" strikes are a fiction unions comply with only so long as the general system is working for them.

[–] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What we need is labor to group together and start buying their own courts and judges.

[–] HailSeitan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I suspect that funding worker organizing would yield greater results

[–] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

and why the fuck should we care about legality, in what way is legality equivilent to morality. If we let the law justify what is moral, then any time something works for labor, they can just make it illegal and therefor immoral

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Are there enough lackeys? If quality falls through the floor as well, won't it just further cement how dumb this whole strategy is? We may be taking lessons that it'll take a few years to learn but...

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then they just privatize it and give it all to their wealthy buddies. For the things that they will even bother replacing... They want this shit to fail and they will replace most of it with nothing.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Creation is always more difficult than destruction, and none of our society was built without some kind of need. Most people like to build with others. Some take advantage of that spirit and become leaders for the sake of leading. Only morons would simultaneously covet power and actively work against people's basic motivations.

I am working with others to actively fight should it come to that. But no matter what, we escaped the dark ages once, we'll do so again.

[–] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago

Probably not, when you consider that he’s also about to deport a lot of your farm and construction workers…maybe he’ll find a way to get retirees, most of who will be his supporters, back to work.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

Trump, and the Republicans in general, seriously underestimate just how much stuff the US government actually does, and how much institutional knowledge is required to do it. A widespread federal worker strike would be disastrous for them, and trying to replace all of those people with lackeys would be even more disastrous, because none of them would have the slightest clue what they are doing. And yes, I'm well aware that the Republicans are trying to sabotage the government, but going about it this way would have the opposite effect; everything coming crashing to a halt overnight would drive home to voters, in a really big way, just how much it is that the government actually does for people.

[–] sudo42@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s also pretty damn close to what Trump genuinely wants - for everyone currently doing the work to quit. That way he can install lackeys across the board.

This plan only works if employees are indeed replaceable cogs. The thought is, "If employees quit, then we can simply replace them all". "Unskilled labor" as it were. This assumption is common in management circles.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

There's also the not-so-secret goal of dismantling the government from the inside. The Republicans have been openly running with that one for 45 years