this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
421 points (94.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

30722 readers
1900 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Example: I believe that IP is a direct contradiction of nature, sacrificing the advancement of humanity and the world for selfish gain, and therefore is sinful.

~~Edit: pls do not downvote the comments this is a constructive discussion~~

Edit2: IP= intellectal property

Edit3: sort by controversal

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] crimsonpoodle@pawb.social 12 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

I think that once it’s viable it would be ok to release a virus which genetically modifies all humans to be more empathetic and to think more critically.

It would be a violation of bodily autonomy, which I generally do believe in, but I think it’s necessary for the productive and positive future of humanity on the single planet which we currently inhabit.

(Yes definitions of intelligence vary, and epigenetics and nurture play a role, but we’re talking statistics and a statistical improvement is still an improvement)

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

"You're not MAGA? You must not be thinking critically. Here are some genetic modifications to make you love trump forever."

[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

If you haven't already, check out Upgrade, by Blake Crouch. Good book, similar premise.

[–] xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago

considering that viruses mutate, this would be the most horrible thing to ever befall humanity….

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

if it has no downsides, is it even against bodily autonomy?

This is like arguing you shouldn't sell farmed food in grocery stores, because it violates the bodily autonomy to starve and die in famine.

[–] crimsonpoodle@pawb.social 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I mean releasing said virus into the public; let’s say it’s airborne. That would violate bodily autonomy as we are modifying people without their consent. But yeah I agree it doesn’t really have too many downsides beyond potential for unintended consequences.

yeah but like, by that argument, burning wood is a violation of the bodily autonomy of other people.

Farting in a public space would be an equally problematic activity.

The biggest argument here is that it's "artificial" and "alters human comprehension" but i'm not really sure it would even matter, because ethically, you would have a hard time arguing against it.

Murder being illegal, is technically a violation of bodily autonomy, but we collectively agree as a society, that this should be the case, because the net effect of murder being illegal, is beneficial to society.

the worst possible case, is that it has a mortality rate, of like 0.001% or something, which would kill a lot of people, but would that even negatively impact the world? It's hard to say.